The Effectiveness of Nurse Managers' Strategies in Implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework: a validation and descriptive study.

Igiene e sanita pubblica Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Domenico Lombardi Fortino, Attilio Massimo de Cosmo, Carla Lucertini, Alvisa Palese
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Nurse Managers' Strategies in Implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework: a validation and descriptive study.","authors":"Domenico Lombardi Fortino, Attilio Massimo de Cosmo, Carla Lucertini, Alvisa Palese","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Fundamentals of Care (FoC) represent a cornerstone of nursing care, focused on meeting patients' physical, psychosocial, and relational needs. The FoC approach is distinguished by its holistic nature, going beyond the execution of clinical/care procedures to include respect for patient dignity, appropriate communication, and the promotion of comfort and overall well-being. Despite the growing emphasis on FoC in nursing practice, evidence suggests that implementing this care model still faces challenges, particularly regarding uniform application and organizational support.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to validate a tool developed to assess ward nurse coordinators' perceptions of the effectiveness of their strategies in supporting the care team in delivering fundamental care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire was validated using the \"Survey Research Methods\" methodology, through the systematic administration of questionnaires to a representative sample of individuals or groups to collect information on the study topics. The questionnaire was directly administered to nurse coordinators in clinical inpatient settings and included a series of structured, closed-ended questions designed to assess the application of FoC in nursing practice, challenges in implementation, and their knowledge and perceptions regarding the importance of Fundamentals of Care in the patient care process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis revealed significant findings regarding the effectiveness of the assessment tool. The questionnaire demonstrated excellent reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.89, indicating high internal consistency of the questions. Seventy-eight percent of coordinators reported perceiving their strategies as effective in supporting the team in delivering fundamental care. Sixty-five percent of respondents identified ongoing staff training as the most effective strategy for improving care quality. Additionally, 85% of participants highlighted the importance of consistent feedback from the team to optimize care strategies. These findings suggest that coordinators have a positive perception of their leadership actions and that the questionnaire is a valid tool for monitoring these perceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results indicate that the PILOT NM-FoC/2023 questionnaire is a valid tool for evaluating the effectiveness of FoC implementation strategies. This pilot study suggests that, with appropriate modifications, the questionnaire could be used on a larger scale to provide more generalizable data, significantly contributing to improving the quality of nursing care. Overall, the findings show that to support the adoption and implementation of the FoC model, greater organizational focus is needed, including strengthening corporate policies with a particular emphasis on ongoing staff training in the use of FoC.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":"93 6","pages":"170-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Fundamentals of Care (FoC) represent a cornerstone of nursing care, focused on meeting patients' physical, psychosocial, and relational needs. The FoC approach is distinguished by its holistic nature, going beyond the execution of clinical/care procedures to include respect for patient dignity, appropriate communication, and the promotion of comfort and overall well-being. Despite the growing emphasis on FoC in nursing practice, evidence suggests that implementing this care model still faces challenges, particularly regarding uniform application and organizational support.

Objectives: This study aims to validate a tool developed to assess ward nurse coordinators' perceptions of the effectiveness of their strategies in supporting the care team in delivering fundamental care.

Methods: The questionnaire was validated using the "Survey Research Methods" methodology, through the systematic administration of questionnaires to a representative sample of individuals or groups to collect information on the study topics. The questionnaire was directly administered to nurse coordinators in clinical inpatient settings and included a series of structured, closed-ended questions designed to assess the application of FoC in nursing practice, challenges in implementation, and their knowledge and perceptions regarding the importance of Fundamentals of Care in the patient care process.

Results: Data analysis revealed significant findings regarding the effectiveness of the assessment tool. The questionnaire demonstrated excellent reliability, with a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.89, indicating high internal consistency of the questions. Seventy-eight percent of coordinators reported perceiving their strategies as effective in supporting the team in delivering fundamental care. Sixty-five percent of respondents identified ongoing staff training as the most effective strategy for improving care quality. Additionally, 85% of participants highlighted the importance of consistent feedback from the team to optimize care strategies. These findings suggest that coordinators have a positive perception of their leadership actions and that the questionnaire is a valid tool for monitoring these perceptions.

Conclusions: The study results indicate that the PILOT NM-FoC/2023 questionnaire is a valid tool for evaluating the effectiveness of FoC implementation strategies. This pilot study suggests that, with appropriate modifications, the questionnaire could be used on a larger scale to provide more generalizable data, significantly contributing to improving the quality of nursing care. Overall, the findings show that to support the adoption and implementation of the FoC model, greater organizational focus is needed, including strengthening corporate policies with a particular emphasis on ongoing staff training in the use of FoC.

护理管理者实施护理框架基本原则策略的有效性:一项验证和描述性研究。
简介:护理基础(FoC)是护理的基石,侧重于满足患者的身体、社会心理和关系需求。FoC方法的特点是其整体性,超越了临床/护理程序的执行,包括尊重病人的尊严,适当的沟通,促进舒适和整体健康。尽管在护理实践中越来越重视FoC,但有证据表明,实施这种护理模式仍然面临挑战,特别是在统一应用和组织支持方面。目的:本研究旨在验证开发的工具,以评估病房护士协调员对其支持护理团队提供基本护理的策略有效性的看法。方法:采用“调查研究方法”的方法对问卷进行验证,通过对具有代表性的个人或群体样本进行系统的问卷管理,收集有关研究主题的信息。问卷直接发放给临床住院护士协调员,包括一系列结构化的封闭式问题,旨在评估FoC在护理实践中的应用、实施中的挑战,以及他们对护理基础在患者护理过程中的重要性的认识和看法。结果:数据分析揭示了评估工具有效性的重要发现。问卷的信度极佳,Cronbach's Alpha系数为0.89,说明问卷的内部一致性较高。78%的协调员报告说,他们认为自己的策略在支持团队提供基本护理方面是有效的。65%的受访者认为,持续的员工培训是提高护理质量的最有效策略。此外,85%的参与者强调了团队一致反馈对优化护理策略的重要性。这些发现表明,协调员对他们的领导行为有积极的看法,而问卷是监测这些看法的有效工具。结论:研究结果表明PILOT NM-FoC/2023问卷是评估FoC实施策略有效性的有效工具。本初步研究表明,通过适当的修改,问卷可以在更大的范围内使用,以提供更多的可概括的数据,显著有助于提高护理质量。总体而言,调查结果表明,为了支持FoC模式的采用和实施,需要更大的组织重点,包括加强公司政策,特别强调员工在使用FoC方面的持续培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信