Concomitant exposure to benzodiazepines during pembrolizumab-based therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-score matched analysis of monitoring agency data.

Q3 Medicine
Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.37349/etat.2025.1002287
Fabrizio Nelli, Enzo Maria Ruggeri, Antonella Virtuoso, Diana Giannarelli, Armando Raso, Federica Natoni, Gloria Pessina, Daniele Remotti, Mario Giovanni Chilelli, Carlo Signorelli, Agnese Fabbri
{"title":"Concomitant exposure to benzodiazepines during pembrolizumab-based therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-score matched analysis of monitoring agency data.","authors":"Fabrizio Nelli, Enzo Maria Ruggeri, Antonella Virtuoso, Diana Giannarelli, Armando Raso, Federica Natoni, Gloria Pessina, Daniele Remotti, Mario Giovanni Chilelli, Carlo Signorelli, Agnese Fabbri","doi":"10.37349/etat.2025.1002287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The interaction of concomitant benzodiazepine (BZD) exposure during immune checkpoint blockade has not been comprehensively investigated to date. This research aimed to determine the influence of BZD intake on the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving pembrolizumab-based therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who were given frontline pembrolizumab, whether as exclusive therapy or combined with platinum-based chemotherapy. The classification of BZD relied on the molecular composition, distinguishing between <i>N</i>-substituted and <i>N</i>-unsubstituted compounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the time frame from April 2018 to May 2023, we enrolled 258 patients, 156 (60.5%) and 102 (39.5%) of whom received pembrolizumab alone or the combination regimen, respectively. We identified 108 (41.8%) exposed patients (BZD cohort) in comparison to all others (no-BZD cohort). After applying propensity-score matching, 108 cases were relevant for each cohort. After a median follow-up of 16.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.1-19.7] months, univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between BZD cohorts. However, patients exposed to <i>N</i>-substituted compounds had significantly longer PFS and OS than those who did not take BZD. Conversely, patients exposed to <i>N</i>-unsubstituted compounds experienced significantly shortened OS. Multivariate testing showed that taking unspecified BZD had no impact on PFS or OS, while <i>N</i>-substituted BZD exposure correlated independently with longer PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.79); <i>P</i> = 0.002] and OS [HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.38-0.88); <i>P</i> < 0.001]. In contrast, <i>N</i>-unsubstituted BZD intake had worsening effects on OS [HR 1.92 (95% CI 1.20-3.06); <i>P</i> = 0.006].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BZD exposure may impact the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC. The specific composition may influence the choice among different compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":73002,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy","volume":"6 ","pages":"1002287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/etat.2025.1002287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The interaction of concomitant benzodiazepine (BZD) exposure during immune checkpoint blockade has not been comprehensively investigated to date. This research aimed to determine the influence of BZD intake on the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving pembrolizumab-based therapies.

Methods: We included consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who were given frontline pembrolizumab, whether as exclusive therapy or combined with platinum-based chemotherapy. The classification of BZD relied on the molecular composition, distinguishing between N-substituted and N-unsubstituted compounds.

Results: During the time frame from April 2018 to May 2023, we enrolled 258 patients, 156 (60.5%) and 102 (39.5%) of whom received pembrolizumab alone or the combination regimen, respectively. We identified 108 (41.8%) exposed patients (BZD cohort) in comparison to all others (no-BZD cohort). After applying propensity-score matching, 108 cases were relevant for each cohort. After a median follow-up of 16.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.1-19.7] months, univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between BZD cohorts. However, patients exposed to N-substituted compounds had significantly longer PFS and OS than those who did not take BZD. Conversely, patients exposed to N-unsubstituted compounds experienced significantly shortened OS. Multivariate testing showed that taking unspecified BZD had no impact on PFS or OS, while N-substituted BZD exposure correlated independently with longer PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.79); P = 0.002] and OS [HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.38-0.88); P < 0.001]. In contrast, N-unsubstituted BZD intake had worsening effects on OS [HR 1.92 (95% CI 1.20-3.06); P = 0.006].

Conclusions: BZD exposure may impact the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC. The specific composition may influence the choice among different compounds.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信