Prism adaptation combined with serious games for improving visual-constructive abilities in stroke patients: randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1425410
Massimiliano Oliveri, Sergio Bagnato, Silvia Rizzo, Emilia Imbornone, Patrizia Turriziani
{"title":"Prism adaptation combined with serious games for improving visual-constructive abilities in stroke patients: randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Massimiliano Oliveri, Sergio Bagnato, Silvia Rizzo, Emilia Imbornone, Patrizia Turriziani","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1425410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Visuomotor adaptation to a displacement of the visual field induced by prismatic lenses can help rehabilitate cognitive deficits when combined with digital cognitive training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in rehabilitating visual constructive deficits in stroke patients, assess the generalization of improvements to daily living skills, identify which serious games best predicted improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty stroke patients were randomly assigned to either a control group, receiving standard rehabilitation, or an experimental group, receiving a therapy combining prism adaptation with cognitive training through serious games over ten consecutive sessions. Patients were administered a neuropsychological test battery at baseline (T0) and after 10 days (T1). Visual constructive abilities were evaluated using Freehand Copy of Drawings and Copy of Drawings with Landmarks tests. Spatial attention was evaluated using Albert's Line Cancellation and Line Bisection tests. Functional abilities were evaluated with the Barthel Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test scores of the Freehand Copy of Drawings improved from T0 to T1 in both the experimental (6.89 ± 2.7 vs. 7.83 ± 2.9; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and the control group (5.84 ± 2.1 vs. 7.51 ± 2.2; <i>p</i> = 0.01). The improvement was comparable between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.38). Test scores of the Copy of Drawings with Landmarks improved from T0 to T1 in the experimental (42.94 ± 19.6 vs. 50.2 ± 18.1; <i>p</i> = 0.007), but not in the control group (39.9 ± 19.6 vs. 42.7 ± 20.9; <i>p</i> = 0.41). The improvement was comparable between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.28). In the experimental group, Barthel Index scores at T1 correlated with both Free Hand Copy of Drawings scores (<i>R</i> = 0.651; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and Copy of Drawings with Landmarks scores (<i>R</i> = 0.582; <i>p</i> = 0.02). No correlations were found in the Control Group. Serious games targeting attention and motor planning were predictive of improvements in visual construction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>prismatic lenses combined with digital cognitive training improve visual construction and functional abilities in stroke patients, providing a novel method to promote stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1425410"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1425410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Visuomotor adaptation to a displacement of the visual field induced by prismatic lenses can help rehabilitate cognitive deficits when combined with digital cognitive training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in rehabilitating visual constructive deficits in stroke patients, assess the generalization of improvements to daily living skills, identify which serious games best predicted improvements.

Methods: Thirty stroke patients were randomly assigned to either a control group, receiving standard rehabilitation, or an experimental group, receiving a therapy combining prism adaptation with cognitive training through serious games over ten consecutive sessions. Patients were administered a neuropsychological test battery at baseline (T0) and after 10 days (T1). Visual constructive abilities were evaluated using Freehand Copy of Drawings and Copy of Drawings with Landmarks tests. Spatial attention was evaluated using Albert's Line Cancellation and Line Bisection tests. Functional abilities were evaluated with the Barthel Index.

Results: Test scores of the Freehand Copy of Drawings improved from T0 to T1 in both the experimental (6.89 ± 2.7 vs. 7.83 ± 2.9; p = 0.01) and the control group (5.84 ± 2.1 vs. 7.51 ± 2.2; p = 0.01). The improvement was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.38). Test scores of the Copy of Drawings with Landmarks improved from T0 to T1 in the experimental (42.94 ± 19.6 vs. 50.2 ± 18.1; p = 0.007), but not in the control group (39.9 ± 19.6 vs. 42.7 ± 20.9; p = 0.41). The improvement was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.28). In the experimental group, Barthel Index scores at T1 correlated with both Free Hand Copy of Drawings scores (R = 0.651; p = 0.009) and Copy of Drawings with Landmarks scores (R = 0.582; p = 0.02). No correlations were found in the Control Group. Serious games targeting attention and motor planning were predictive of improvements in visual construction.

Conclusion: prismatic lenses combined with digital cognitive training improve visual construction and functional abilities in stroke patients, providing a novel method to promote stroke rehabilitation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信