Interest in Osteoporosis among Nurses and Physicians before Introduction of a Fracture Liaison Service: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yasuyuki Kitagawa, Kazuma Miura, Yuki Katano, Daiki Saito, Daisuke Fukuhara, Naoto Kotani, Shoko Sasaki, Naoya Takabayashi, Yosuke Shinozuka, Tokifumi Majima
{"title":"Interest in Osteoporosis among Nurses and Physicians before Introduction of a Fracture Liaison Service: A Questionnaire-Based Study.","authors":"Yasuyuki Kitagawa, Kazuma Miura, Yuki Katano, Daiki Saito, Daisuke Fukuhara, Naoto Kotani, Shoko Sasaki, Naoya Takabayashi, Yosuke Shinozuka, Tokifumi Majima","doi":"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2025_92-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis-related fragility fractures such as proximal femoral and vertebral fractures are associated with decreased activities of daily living and a shorter life span. Many persons with osteoporosis do not receive testing or treatment. Introducing fracture liaison services (FLSs) to hospitals is an effective approach for reducing this treatment gap. Understanding interest in osteoporosis among nurses and physicians, their knowledge of osteoporosis, and their thoughts on team medicine for treatment of osteoporosis might be helpful when implementing FLSs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An FLS had not been introduced at our hospital. We conducted a questionnaire survey of nurses and physicians at our hospital regarding their interest in osteoporosis, their knowledge of osteoporosis, and their thoughts on team medicine for osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half of the nurses and physicians were interested in osteoporosis. About 70% of nurses and physicians believed that team medicine was necessary for treating osteoporosis, and 50-60% believed that it should be introduced in the hospital. Only 5% of nurses and 18% of physicians had knowledge of FLSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staff perceptions of team care for osteoporosis were generally supportive in our hospital. However, the introduction of an FLS to the hospital required educational activities for staff. The results of this survey will be helpful to other hospitals introducing FLSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","volume":"92 1","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2025_92-107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis-related fragility fractures such as proximal femoral and vertebral fractures are associated with decreased activities of daily living and a shorter life span. Many persons with osteoporosis do not receive testing or treatment. Introducing fracture liaison services (FLSs) to hospitals is an effective approach for reducing this treatment gap. Understanding interest in osteoporosis among nurses and physicians, their knowledge of osteoporosis, and their thoughts on team medicine for treatment of osteoporosis might be helpful when implementing FLSs.

Methods: An FLS had not been introduced at our hospital. We conducted a questionnaire survey of nurses and physicians at our hospital regarding their interest in osteoporosis, their knowledge of osteoporosis, and their thoughts on team medicine for osteoporosis.

Results: About half of the nurses and physicians were interested in osteoporosis. About 70% of nurses and physicians believed that team medicine was necessary for treating osteoporosis, and 50-60% believed that it should be introduced in the hospital. Only 5% of nurses and 18% of physicians had knowledge of FLSs.

Conclusion: Staff perceptions of team care for osteoporosis were generally supportive in our hospital. However, the introduction of an FLS to the hospital required educational activities for staff. The results of this survey will be helpful to other hospitals introducing FLSs.

在引入骨折联络服务之前护士和医生对骨质疏松症的兴趣:一项基于问卷的研究。
背景:骨质疏松相关脆性骨折,如股骨近端骨折和椎体骨折,与日常生活活动减少和寿命缩短有关。许多骨质疏松症患者不接受检测或治疗。在医院引入骨折联络服务(FLSs)是缩小这一治疗差距的有效途径。了解护士和医生对骨质疏松症的兴趣,他们对骨质疏松症的知识,以及他们对骨质疏松症治疗的团队医学的想法,可能有助于实施骨质疏松症。方法:我院尚未引进FLS。我们对我院的护士和医生进行了问卷调查,了解他们对骨质疏松症的兴趣,骨质疏松症的知识,以及他们对骨质疏松症团队医学的看法。结果:约一半的护士和医生对骨质疏松感兴趣。约70%的护士和医生认为团队医学是治疗骨质疏松症的必要条件,50-60%的人认为应该在医院引入团队医学。只有5%的护士和18%的医生了解FLSs。结论:我院员工对骨质疏松症团队护理的认知总体持支持态度。然而,在医院引进外联系统需要对工作人员进行教育活动。本研究的结果对其他医院引进FLSs有一定的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nippon Medical School
Journal of Nippon Medical School MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The international effort to understand, treat and control disease involve clinicians and researchers from many medical and biological science disciplines. The Journal of Nippon Medical School (JNMS) is the official journal of the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School and is dedicated to furthering international exchange of medical science experience and opinion. It provides an international forum for researchers in the fields of bascic and clinical medicine to introduce, discuss and exchange thier novel achievements in biomedical science and a platform for the worldwide dissemination and steering of biomedical knowledge for the benefit of human health and welfare. Properly reasoned discussions disciplined by appropriate references to existing bodies of knowledge or aimed at motivating the creation of such knowledge is the aim of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信