Subjective responses to simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use relative to alcohol-only use and cannabis-only use: An ecological momentary assessment investigation

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Sophie G. Coelho, Christian S. Hendershot, Jeffrey D. Wardell
{"title":"Subjective responses to simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use relative to alcohol-only use and cannabis-only use: An ecological momentary assessment investigation","authors":"Sophie G. Coelho,&nbsp;Christian S. Hendershot,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Wardell","doi":"10.1111/acer.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Few studies have examined subjective responses to simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use in naturalistic settings. The current study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to compare subjective responses between simultaneous use and both alcohol-only use and cannabis-only use sessions, while also examining the moderating role of quantities of alcohol and cannabis consumed at both the session and person levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Young adults (<i>N</i> = 149, 59.73% women) reporting recent simultaneous use completed three 21-day EMA bursts, spaced 6 months apart. Participants completed a survey each time they initiated a new session of alcohol or cannabis use, along with two hourly follow-up surveys. Surveys assessed alcohol use (quantities), cannabis use (quantities, forms of cannabis), and current acute subjective responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At the session level, simultaneous use (vs. alcohol-only use) was associated with greater peak sedation and intoxication, with the latter association strengthened during sessions involving relatively lighter drinking. Simultaneous use sessions also involved greater peak liking ratings relative to alcohol-only use sessions, though only among participants who reported relatively lower average alcohol consumption. In addition, relative to cannabis-only use sessions, simultaneous use sessions were associated with greater peak energized and liking ratings, with the former association strengthened during sessions involving relatively heavier cannabis concentrate use. Simultaneous use sessions also involved lower peak sedated and anxious ratings relative to cannabis-only use sessions, though only among participants who reported relatively lighter average cannabis consumption.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, simultaneous use was experienced as more impairing (i.e., greater intoxication and sedation) than alcohol-only use and as more reinforcing (i.e., greater stimulation and liking) than cannabis-only use. Some differences in subjective responses between simultaneous use and single-substance use sessions depended on session-level or person-level consumption amounts, which may inform tailored interventions for simultaneous use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 4","pages":"923-940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Few studies have examined subjective responses to simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use in naturalistic settings. The current study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to compare subjective responses between simultaneous use and both alcohol-only use and cannabis-only use sessions, while also examining the moderating role of quantities of alcohol and cannabis consumed at both the session and person levels.

Methods

Young adults (N = 149, 59.73% women) reporting recent simultaneous use completed three 21-day EMA bursts, spaced 6 months apart. Participants completed a survey each time they initiated a new session of alcohol or cannabis use, along with two hourly follow-up surveys. Surveys assessed alcohol use (quantities), cannabis use (quantities, forms of cannabis), and current acute subjective responses.

Results

At the session level, simultaneous use (vs. alcohol-only use) was associated with greater peak sedation and intoxication, with the latter association strengthened during sessions involving relatively lighter drinking. Simultaneous use sessions also involved greater peak liking ratings relative to alcohol-only use sessions, though only among participants who reported relatively lower average alcohol consumption. In addition, relative to cannabis-only use sessions, simultaneous use sessions were associated with greater peak energized and liking ratings, with the former association strengthened during sessions involving relatively heavier cannabis concentrate use. Simultaneous use sessions also involved lower peak sedated and anxious ratings relative to cannabis-only use sessions, though only among participants who reported relatively lighter average cannabis consumption.

Conclusions

Overall, simultaneous use was experienced as more impairing (i.e., greater intoxication and sedation) than alcohol-only use and as more reinforcing (i.e., greater stimulation and liking) than cannabis-only use. Some differences in subjective responses between simultaneous use and single-substance use sessions depended on session-level or person-level consumption amounts, which may inform tailored interventions for simultaneous use.

Abstract Image

对同时使用酒精和大麻的主观反应相对于只使用酒精和只使用大麻:一项生态瞬间评估调查。
背景:很少有研究调查了在自然环境中同时使用酒精和大麻的主观反应。目前的研究使用生态瞬间评估(EMA)来比较同时使用和只使用酒精和只使用大麻的会话之间的主观反应,同时还研究了在会话和个人水平上消耗的酒精和大麻数量的调节作用。方法:年轻成人(N = 149,女性59.73%)报告近期同时使用3次21天EMA,间隔6个月。参与者每次开始使用酒精或大麻时都要完成一项调查,以及两次每小时的随访调查。调查评估了酒精使用(数量)、大麻使用(数量和形式的大麻)以及目前的急性主观反应。结果:在疗程水平上,同时使用(与仅使用酒精相比)与更大的峰值镇静和中毒相关,后者的关联在相对较少饮酒的疗程中得到加强。与只喝酒的人相比,同时喝酒的人也有更高的峰值喜欢度,尽管这只是在平均饮酒量相对较低的参与者中发生的。此外,相对于只使用大麻的会话,同时使用会话与更高的峰值能量和喜欢评级相关,前者的关联在使用相对较重的大麻浓缩物的会话中得到加强。与只使用大麻的人相比,同时使用大麻的人的镇静和焦虑评分也较低,尽管这只是在报告平均大麻消费量相对较轻的参与者中。结论:总的来说,同时使用比只使用酒精更有损害(即,更大的中毒和镇静),比只使用大麻更有强化(即,更大的刺激和喜欢)。同时使用和单一物质使用期间主观反应的一些差异取决于期间水平或个人水平的消费量,这可能为同时使用量身定制的干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信