Francesco Sanmarchi, Angelo Capodici, Davide Golinelli, Jacopo Lenzi, Manuel Zamparini, Federico Toth, Giovanni De Girolamo, Michael A Stoto
{"title":"Regional variations in Italy's COVID-19 death toll: a descriptive analysis of excess mortality and associated factors from 2020 to 2021.","authors":"Francesco Sanmarchi, Angelo Capodici, Davide Golinelli, Jacopo Lenzi, Manuel Zamparini, Federico Toth, Giovanni De Girolamo, Michael A Stoto","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00370-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Italy implemented various measures, including lockdowns and a mass vaccination campaign, to address the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to describe the temporal and regional differences in mortality trends between March 2020 and December 2021, along with associated socioeconomic, policy, and behavioral factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used National Ministry of Health data on COVID-19 mortality, excess mortality (EM), and vaccine uptake, along with data from the Italian arm of a European survey of preventive behaviors and attitudes, such as trust in institutions. The analysis was conducted across four macro regions and five study periods. Avertable mortality was calculated as observed EM minus the lowest EM at the macro-regional level for each study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020-21, the estimated total EM was 180,169 deaths, with 76.4% officially attributed to COVID-19. This proportion ranged from 13.5% in the South and Islands (June-October 2020) to 140.0% in the Northeast (March-July 2021). Excess and avertable mortality peaked in the North during the first two periods (March 2020 - February 2021) and in the South and Islands thereafter (March-December 2021). Survey data revealed reduced adherence to stay-at-home orders in the North and lower trust in hospitals and reduced vaccine uptake, especially among the elderly, in the South and Islands. After the initial period, 33,587 deaths (18.6%) could have been averted if each macro-region had matched the lowest rates observed in that period. An estimated 40.7% of avertable deaths occurred in Southern and Insular Italy, which constitutes 33.7% of the national population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to differential misreporting, EM estimates offer a more accurate view of regional and temporal patterns in COVID-19 mortality than official rates. The higher EM in northern Italy during the first year of the pandemic might be linked to lesser adherence to control policies, possibly associated with higher private-sector employment. The higher EM in the South and Islands post-March 2021, contributing to 40.7% of avertable EM, could be partly explained by the lower vaccination rates in the population aged 80 and older, who experienced the highest age-specific mortality rates and lower trust in the healthcare system in this macro-region.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00370-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Italy implemented various measures, including lockdowns and a mass vaccination campaign, to address the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to describe the temporal and regional differences in mortality trends between March 2020 and December 2021, along with associated socioeconomic, policy, and behavioral factors.
Methods: We used National Ministry of Health data on COVID-19 mortality, excess mortality (EM), and vaccine uptake, along with data from the Italian arm of a European survey of preventive behaviors and attitudes, such as trust in institutions. The analysis was conducted across four macro regions and five study periods. Avertable mortality was calculated as observed EM minus the lowest EM at the macro-regional level for each study period.
Results: In 2020-21, the estimated total EM was 180,169 deaths, with 76.4% officially attributed to COVID-19. This proportion ranged from 13.5% in the South and Islands (June-October 2020) to 140.0% in the Northeast (March-July 2021). Excess and avertable mortality peaked in the North during the first two periods (March 2020 - February 2021) and in the South and Islands thereafter (March-December 2021). Survey data revealed reduced adherence to stay-at-home orders in the North and lower trust in hospitals and reduced vaccine uptake, especially among the elderly, in the South and Islands. After the initial period, 33,587 deaths (18.6%) could have been averted if each macro-region had matched the lowest rates observed in that period. An estimated 40.7% of avertable deaths occurred in Southern and Insular Italy, which constitutes 33.7% of the national population.
Conclusions: Due to differential misreporting, EM estimates offer a more accurate view of regional and temporal patterns in COVID-19 mortality than official rates. The higher EM in northern Italy during the first year of the pandemic might be linked to lesser adherence to control policies, possibly associated with higher private-sector employment. The higher EM in the South and Islands post-March 2021, contributing to 40.7% of avertable EM, could be partly explained by the lower vaccination rates in the population aged 80 and older, who experienced the highest age-specific mortality rates and lower trust in the healthcare system in this macro-region.
期刊介绍:
Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.