A novel method for objective quantification of apathy based on gaze and physiological reactivity to stimuli presented in a virtual reality environment.

IF 4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ramit Ravona-Springer, Or Koren, Noam Galor, Michal Lapid, Yotam Bahat, Ronen Fluss, Meytal Wilf, Shlomit Zorani, Uri Rosenblum, Michal Schnaider Beeri, Meir Plotnik
{"title":"A novel method for objective quantification of apathy based on gaze and physiological reactivity to stimuli presented in a virtual reality environment.","authors":"Ramit Ravona-Springer, Or Koren, Noam Galor, Michal Lapid, Yotam Bahat, Ronen Fluss, Meytal Wilf, Shlomit Zorani, Uri Rosenblum, Michal Schnaider Beeri, Meir Plotnik","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We developed a tool for objective quantification of apathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 97; 67 with cognitive impairment, 30 cognitively normal; mean age = 74.3 ± 6.2 years, 56.7% females) were exposed to emotional and cognitive stimuli in a virtual reality environment. Gaze metrics (time to first fixation [TTFF] and total fixation duration [TFD]) and autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity were measured. Apathy and depression were clinically assessed using the Lille Apathy Rating Scale short version and the Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version, respectively. Cutoffs of ≥ -7 and ≥ 5 were used to define apathy and depression, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 14 participants with apathy only, 9 with depression only, 10 with both, 63 with neither, and 1 with missing data. For all emotional stimuli, participants with apathy only showed longer TTFF (<i>P</i> = 0.039, effect sizes [ES] = 0.798), and shorter TFD (<i>P</i> = 0.023, ES = 0.578) compared to those without apathy or depression. ANS reactivity was not associated with apathy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Apathy is associated with decreased gaze engagement at emotional stimuli.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Apathy measurement via questionnaires is limited by subjectivity biases.Apathy measurement via questionnaires is limited by simplistic scoring.We present a novel method for objective measurement of apathy.Gaze characteristics reflect the emotional and cognitive components of apathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"17 1","pages":"e70020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We developed a tool for objective quantification of apathy.

Methods: Participants (n = 97; 67 with cognitive impairment, 30 cognitively normal; mean age = 74.3 ± 6.2 years, 56.7% females) were exposed to emotional and cognitive stimuli in a virtual reality environment. Gaze metrics (time to first fixation [TTFF] and total fixation duration [TFD]) and autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity were measured. Apathy and depression were clinically assessed using the Lille Apathy Rating Scale short version and the Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version, respectively. Cutoffs of ≥ -7 and ≥ 5 were used to define apathy and depression, respectively.

Results: The sample comprised 14 participants with apathy only, 9 with depression only, 10 with both, 63 with neither, and 1 with missing data. For all emotional stimuli, participants with apathy only showed longer TTFF (P = 0.039, effect sizes [ES] = 0.798), and shorter TFD (P = 0.023, ES = 0.578) compared to those without apathy or depression. ANS reactivity was not associated with apathy.

Discussion: Apathy is associated with decreased gaze engagement at emotional stimuli.

Highlights: Apathy measurement via questionnaires is limited by subjectivity biases.Apathy measurement via questionnaires is limited by simplistic scoring.We present a novel method for objective measurement of apathy.Gaze characteristics reflect the emotional and cognitive components of apathy.

一种在虚拟现实环境中,基于凝视和对刺激的生理反应客观量化冷漠的新方法。
我们开发了一种客观量化冷漠的工具。方法:受试者(n = 97;认知功能障碍67例,认知正常30例;平均年龄为74.3±6.2岁(56.7%为女性),在虚拟现实环境中接受情绪和认知刺激。测量凝视指标(首次注视时间[TTFF]和总注视时间[TFD])和自主神经系统(ANS)反应性。冷漠和抑郁分别采用里尔冷漠评定量表短版和老年抑郁量表15项版本进行临床评估。分别采用≥-7和≥5的临界值来定义冷漠和抑郁。结果:样本包括14名只有冷漠的参与者,9名只有抑郁的参与者,10名两者都有,63名两者都没有,1名数据缺失。对于所有情绪刺激,与没有冷漠或抑郁的参与者相比,冷漠的参与者仅表现出较长的TTFF (P = 0.039,效应量[ES] = 0.798)和较短的TFD (P = 0.023, ES = 0.578)。ANS反应性与冷漠无关。讨论:冷漠与对情绪刺激的凝视减少有关。重点:通过问卷的冷漠测量受到主观性偏差的限制。通过问卷进行的冷漠测量受到简单评分的限制。我们提出了一种客观测量冷漠的新方法。凝视特征反映了冷漠的情感和认知成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信