Association of Precarious Employment with Unmet Healthcare Needs and Health Checkup Participation.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Seong-Uk Baek, Jin-Ha Yoon
{"title":"Association of Precarious Employment with Unmet Healthcare Needs and Health Checkup Participation.","authors":"Seong-Uk Baek, Jin-Ha Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Precarious employment (PE) has emerged as a public health concern. This study explored the association between PE and unmet healthcare needs and participation in health checkups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of 12,215 wage workers, comprising a total of 65,405 observations, obtained from the Korean Welfare Panel Study (2008-2022). PE was characterized by insecure employment, inadequate wages, and lack of worker rights, and categorized into quartiles: lowest, low, high, and highest. The study focused on two outcomes: unmet healthcare needs due to financial constraints and non-participation in health checkups over the past year. Robust Poisson regression models were used to calculate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) under the framework of generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the respondents, 0.7% reported unmet healthcare needs, while 44.2% did not attend health checkups. Compared with workers in the lowest PE quartile, those in the high and highest PE quartiles had a 5.83-fold (95% CI: 2.73-12.45) and 12.53-fold (95% CI: 5.88-26.70) increase in the prevalence of experiencing unmet healthcare needs, respectively. Similarly, compared to the lowest PE quartile, those in the high and highest PE quartiles had a 2.38-fold (95% CI: 2.26-2.51) and 2.92-fold (95% CI: 2.77-3.08) increase in the prevalence of non-participation in health checkups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PE is associated with unmet healthcare needs and non-participation in health checkups. This study underscores the need for policies that improve healthcare access for workers in precarious conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.02.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Precarious employment (PE) has emerged as a public health concern. This study explored the association between PE and unmet healthcare needs and participation in health checkups.

Methods: This study analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of 12,215 wage workers, comprising a total of 65,405 observations, obtained from the Korean Welfare Panel Study (2008-2022). PE was characterized by insecure employment, inadequate wages, and lack of worker rights, and categorized into quartiles: lowest, low, high, and highest. The study focused on two outcomes: unmet healthcare needs due to financial constraints and non-participation in health checkups over the past year. Robust Poisson regression models were used to calculate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) under the framework of generalized estimating equations.

Results: Of the respondents, 0.7% reported unmet healthcare needs, while 44.2% did not attend health checkups. Compared with workers in the lowest PE quartile, those in the high and highest PE quartiles had a 5.83-fold (95% CI: 2.73-12.45) and 12.53-fold (95% CI: 5.88-26.70) increase in the prevalence of experiencing unmet healthcare needs, respectively. Similarly, compared to the lowest PE quartile, those in the high and highest PE quartiles had a 2.38-fold (95% CI: 2.26-2.51) and 2.92-fold (95% CI: 2.77-3.08) increase in the prevalence of non-participation in health checkups, respectively.

Conclusion: PE is associated with unmet healthcare needs and non-participation in health checkups. This study underscores the need for policies that improve healthcare access for workers in precarious conditions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信