Comparing Tinnitus Suppression in Asymmetric Hearing Loss and Single-Sided Deafness: Cochlear Versus Bone Conduction Implants.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1002/lary.32090
Jae Sang Han, Min Chae Jeon, Chan Mi Lee, Gianfranco C Velasco, So Young Park, Shi Nae Park
{"title":"Comparing Tinnitus Suppression in Asymmetric Hearing Loss and Single-Sided Deafness: Cochlear Versus Bone Conduction Implants.","authors":"Jae Sang Han, Min Chae Jeon, Chan Mi Lee, Gianfranco C Velasco, So Young Park, Shi Nae Park","doi":"10.1002/lary.32090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implantable hearing devices, such as cochlear implants (CI) and bone conduction implants (BCI), are options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and single-sided deafness (SSD). This study aimed to compare the effects of CI and BCI on tinnitus in AHL/SSD patients with tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled adult AHL/SSD patients with significant tinnitus who underwent CI or BCI placement between 2017 and 2023. Clinical characteristics, preoperative and postoperative audiologic test results, and tinnitus questionnaires (tinnitus handicap inventory, THI; visual analog scale, VAS) were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 33 AHL/SSD patients with significant tinnitus (THI ≥ 18), 16 received CI and 17 BCI. In the CI group, all four VAS scores (loudness, awareness, annoyance, and effect on life) and THI scores significantly improved. In the BCI group, annoyance and effect on life categories of VAS and THI scores significantly improved, while VAS loudness and awareness remained similar. Linear mixed model analysis showed that the decrease in VAS loudness, awareness, and annoyance scores was significantly greater in the CI group compared to the BCI group. The CI group showed a significantly higher tinnitus cure rate (62.5.0%) compared with the BCI group (11.8%) at 6-months postoperative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CI and BCI effectively improved tinnitus in AHL/SSD patients with tinnitus. However, CI is considered the first-line therapeutic option for tinnitus due to its stronger effect on tinnitus suppression as well as the higher cure rate in SSD/AHL patients with tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Implantable hearing devices, such as cochlear implants (CI) and bone conduction implants (BCI), are options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and single-sided deafness (SSD). This study aimed to compare the effects of CI and BCI on tinnitus in AHL/SSD patients with tinnitus.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled adult AHL/SSD patients with significant tinnitus who underwent CI or BCI placement between 2017 and 2023. Clinical characteristics, preoperative and postoperative audiologic test results, and tinnitus questionnaires (tinnitus handicap inventory, THI; visual analog scale, VAS) were collected and analyzed.

Results: Of 33 AHL/SSD patients with significant tinnitus (THI ≥ 18), 16 received CI and 17 BCI. In the CI group, all four VAS scores (loudness, awareness, annoyance, and effect on life) and THI scores significantly improved. In the BCI group, annoyance and effect on life categories of VAS and THI scores significantly improved, while VAS loudness and awareness remained similar. Linear mixed model analysis showed that the decrease in VAS loudness, awareness, and annoyance scores was significantly greater in the CI group compared to the BCI group. The CI group showed a significantly higher tinnitus cure rate (62.5.0%) compared with the BCI group (11.8%) at 6-months postoperative.

Conclusion: Both CI and BCI effectively improved tinnitus in AHL/SSD patients with tinnitus. However, CI is considered the first-line therapeutic option for tinnitus due to its stronger effect on tinnitus suppression as well as the higher cure rate in SSD/AHL patients with tinnitus.

Level of evidence: 3:

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信