Three- and Twelve-Month Changes in Child and Adult Care Food Program Best Practices and Preschool Children's Dietary Intake in Family Child Care Homes after the Happy Healthy Homes Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Susan B Sisson, Jean Leidner, Spencer Hall, Bethany D Williams, Sara K Vesely, Tiffany Poe, Dianne S Ward, Cady Crosscut, Deana Hildebrand, Alicia L Salvatore
{"title":"Three- and Twelve-Month Changes in Child and Adult Care Food Program Best Practices and Preschool Children's Dietary Intake in Family Child Care Homes after the Happy Healthy Homes Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Susan B Sisson, Jean Leidner, Spencer Hall, Bethany D Williams, Sara K Vesely, Tiffany Poe, Dianne S Ward, Cady Crosscut, Deana Hildebrand, Alicia L Salvatore","doi":"10.1089/chi.2024.0361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Enhancing the quality of Family Child Care Home (FCCH) meals is an opportunity to impact children's diet and health. The purpose of this study is to assess Happy Healthy Homes (HHH) randomized controlled trial impact on health-related foods and nutrients served to and consumed by young children and achievement of Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) requirements and best practices. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Forty-five CACFP participating FCCHs in a moderately sized midwestern city were recruited in 2017-2018 and randomized to nutrition intervention (NUT <i>n</i> = 24) or control (CON <i>n</i> = 21). Participants received two in-home, individual 90-minute education sessions, one 3-hour small group class, and a 15-minute check-in phone call over 3 months. Outcomes include 3- and 12-month served and consumed fiber, sugar, grains, vegetables, and fruit and achievement of CACFP Best Practices. Primary analyses at 12 months used a mixed model under an intent-to-treat paradigm to account for repeated measures on participants with 3-month outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were completed on those with complete 12-month measures. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were no statistically significant group-by-time effects for foods served, consumed, or CACFP Best Practices score in the primary analysis. However, in sensitivity analysis, the CACFP Best Practice score (out of 18) increased in NUT +0.5 from 8.9 ± 1.5 at baseline at 12 months and decreased -0.9 in CON from 9.9 ± 1.7 at baseline, group by time <i>p</i> = 0.05. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The HHH intervention did improve the CACFP Best Practices score for lunches served. The study's effect may have been limited due to sample size and attrition. <b><i>Trial Registration:</i></b> Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03560050. Retrospectively registered on 23 May 2018. First participant enrolled October 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":48842,"journal":{"name":"Childhood Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2024.0361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhancing the quality of Family Child Care Home (FCCH) meals is an opportunity to impact children's diet and health. The purpose of this study is to assess Happy Healthy Homes (HHH) randomized controlled trial impact on health-related foods and nutrients served to and consumed by young children and achievement of Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) requirements and best practices. Methods: Forty-five CACFP participating FCCHs in a moderately sized midwestern city were recruited in 2017-2018 and randomized to nutrition intervention (NUT n = 24) or control (CON n = 21). Participants received two in-home, individual 90-minute education sessions, one 3-hour small group class, and a 15-minute check-in phone call over 3 months. Outcomes include 3- and 12-month served and consumed fiber, sugar, grains, vegetables, and fruit and achievement of CACFP Best Practices. Primary analyses at 12 months used a mixed model under an intent-to-treat paradigm to account for repeated measures on participants with 3-month outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were completed on those with complete 12-month measures. Results: There were no statistically significant group-by-time effects for foods served, consumed, or CACFP Best Practices score in the primary analysis. However, in sensitivity analysis, the CACFP Best Practice score (out of 18) increased in NUT +0.5 from 8.9 ± 1.5 at baseline at 12 months and decreased -0.9 in CON from 9.9 ± 1.7 at baseline, group by time p = 0.05. Conclusions: The HHH intervention did improve the CACFP Best Practices score for lunches served. The study's effect may have been limited due to sample size and attrition. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03560050. Retrospectively registered on 23 May 2018. First participant enrolled October 2017.

快乐健康家园随机对照试验后,家庭托儿所中儿童和成人护理食品计划最佳实践和学龄前儿童饮食摄入量的三到十二个月变化。
背景:提高家庭托儿之家(FCCH)膳食质量是影响儿童饮食和健康的一个机会。本研究的目的是评估快乐健康之家(HHH)随机对照试验对幼儿健康相关食品和营养的影响,以及儿童和成人护理食品计划(CACFP)要求和最佳实践的实现。方法:2017-2018年在中西部一个中等规模城市招募45名CACFP参与FCCHs,随机分为营养干预组(NUT n = 24)和对照组(CON n = 21)。在三个月的时间里,参与者接受了两次90分钟的家庭单独教育课程,一次3小时的小组课程,以及15分钟的登记电话。结果包括3个月和12个月食用和消耗的纤维、糖、谷物、蔬菜和水果,以及CACFP最佳实践的实现。在12个月的初步分析中,使用意向治疗范式下的混合模型来解释对具有3个月结果的参与者的重复测量。对完成12个月测量的患者进行敏感性分析。结果:在初步分析中,提供的食物、消耗的食物或CACFP最佳实践评分没有统计学上显著的分组时间效应。然而,在敏感性分析中,CACFP最佳实践评分(18分)在12个月时NUT +0.5从基线时的8.9±1.5增加,CON从基线时的9.9±1.7减少-0.9,按时间分组p = 0.05。结论:HHH干预确实提高了午餐的CACFP最佳实践得分。由于样本量和人员流失,这项研究的效果可能有限。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03560050。追溯注册于2018年5月23日。第一位参与者于2017年10月注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Childhood Obesity
Childhood Obesity PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Childhood Obesity is the only peer-reviewed journal that delivers actionable, real-world obesity prevention and weight management strategies for children and adolescents. Health disparities and cultural sensitivities are addressed, and plans and protocols are recommended to effect change at the family, school, and community level. The Journal also reports on the problem of access to effective healthcare and delivers evidence-based solutions to overcome these barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信