Adoption of Nutrition and Physical Activity Best Practices in the Early Care and Education Setting: Examination of Differences Between Centers and Family Child Care Homes.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Childhood Obesity Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1089/chi.2024.0369
Reka Vasicsek, Carolyn Rider, Richard Pulvera, Amanda Linares, Janice Kao, Miranda Westfall Brown
{"title":"Adoption of Nutrition and Physical Activity Best Practices in the Early Care and Education Setting: Examination of Differences Between Centers and Family Child Care Homes.","authors":"Reka Vasicsek, Carolyn Rider, Richard Pulvera, Amanda Linares, Janice Kao, Miranda Westfall Brown","doi":"10.1089/chi.2024.0369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Early childhood interventions that support the development of healthy lifestyle behaviors are key to ensuring equitable health outcomes later in life. The aim of this article is to assess the extent to which early care and education (ECE) sites adopt best practices to support healthy diet and physical activity (PA) behaviors and whether adoption differs between centers and family child care homes (FCCHs). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study is a cross-sectional analysis of best practices at Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed)-eligible child care centers (<i>n</i> = 76) and FCCHs (<i>n</i> = 47) in California. Generalized linear models were used to estimate associations of facility type with eight best practice index measures in the following three areas: dietary intake (nutrition education, food and beverage quality, staff training in nutrition), PA (quantity of PA opportunities, quality of PA opportunities, environmental support for PA), and parent engagement and wellness policies (comprehensive, active parent engagement and support for wellness policy implementation, monitoring, and feedback). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, ECE sites scored an average of 64.8% of maximum points possible for best practices to improve dietary intake, 81.7% for best practices to improve PA, and 51.8% in comprehensive parent engagement and wellness policies. FCCHs adhered to fewer best practices for robust nutrition education, relative to centers (β = -0.41, 95% CI [-0.70, -0.12]). Differences were also observed in individual practices between settings. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study highlights opportunities for programs such as SNAP-Ed to support ECE providers in implementing nutrition and PA best practices to help children ages 0-5 develop healthy habits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48842,"journal":{"name":"Childhood Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"309-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2024.0369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early childhood interventions that support the development of healthy lifestyle behaviors are key to ensuring equitable health outcomes later in life. The aim of this article is to assess the extent to which early care and education (ECE) sites adopt best practices to support healthy diet and physical activity (PA) behaviors and whether adoption differs between centers and family child care homes (FCCHs). Methods: The study is a cross-sectional analysis of best practices at Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed)-eligible child care centers (n = 76) and FCCHs (n = 47) in California. Generalized linear models were used to estimate associations of facility type with eight best practice index measures in the following three areas: dietary intake (nutrition education, food and beverage quality, staff training in nutrition), PA (quantity of PA opportunities, quality of PA opportunities, environmental support for PA), and parent engagement and wellness policies (comprehensive, active parent engagement and support for wellness policy implementation, monitoring, and feedback). Results: Overall, ECE sites scored an average of 64.8% of maximum points possible for best practices to improve dietary intake, 81.7% for best practices to improve PA, and 51.8% in comprehensive parent engagement and wellness policies. FCCHs adhered to fewer best practices for robust nutrition education, relative to centers (β = -0.41, 95% CI [-0.70, -0.12]). Differences were also observed in individual practices between settings. Conclusion: This study highlights opportunities for programs such as SNAP-Ed to support ECE providers in implementing nutrition and PA best practices to help children ages 0-5 develop healthy habits.

在早期护理和教育环境中采用营养和体育活动的最佳做法:中心和家庭托儿所之间差异的检查。
背景:支持健康生活方式行为发展的幼儿干预措施是确保生命后期公平健康结果的关键。本文的目的是评估早期护理和教育(ECE)站点采用最佳实践来支持健康饮食和身体活动(PA)行为的程度,以及中心和家庭儿童看护之家(FCCHs)之间的采用是否存在差异。方法:本研究是对加利福尼亚州符合补充营养援助计划-教育(SNAP-Ed)条件的儿童护理中心(n = 76)和儿童保健中心(n = 47)的最佳实践进行横断面分析。使用广义线性模型来估计设施类型与以下三个领域的八项最佳实践指标的关联:膳食摄入量(营养教育,食品和饮料质量,员工营养培训),PA (PA机会的数量,PA机会的质量,PA的环境支持),以及家长参与和健康政策(全面,积极的家长参与和健康政策实施,监测和反馈的支持)。结果:总体而言,欧洲经委会网站在改善饮食摄入的最佳实践方面平均得分为64.8%,在改善PA的最佳实践方面平均得分为81.7%,在综合家长参与和健康政策方面平均得分为51.8%。与中心相比,FCCHs坚持较少的营养教育最佳实践(β = -0.41, 95% CI[-0.70, -0.12])。在不同设置的个体实践中也观察到差异。结论:这项研究强调了SNAP-Ed等项目支持ECE提供者实施营养和PA最佳实践以帮助0-5岁儿童养成健康习惯的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Childhood Obesity
Childhood Obesity PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Childhood Obesity is the only peer-reviewed journal that delivers actionable, real-world obesity prevention and weight management strategies for children and adolescents. Health disparities and cultural sensitivities are addressed, and plans and protocols are recommended to effect change at the family, school, and community level. The Journal also reports on the problem of access to effective healthcare and delivers evidence-based solutions to overcome these barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信