The Biological Rationale for Integrating Intrinsic Capacity Into Frailty Models.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S509990
Zhuowei Yu, Madia Lozupone, Jie Chen, Zhijun Bao, Qingwei Ruan, Francesco Panza
{"title":"The Biological Rationale for Integrating Intrinsic Capacity Into Frailty Models.","authors":"Zhuowei Yu, Madia Lozupone, Jie Chen, Zhijun Bao, Qingwei Ruan, Francesco Panza","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S509990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment and management of two function-centered clinical care models, frailty and intrinsic capacity decline have been proposed to achieve healthy aging. To implement these two care models, several different guidelines have been advocated by different health organizations, which has resulted in confusion and cost-ineffective results in healthcare practice. Although there are various operational definitions and screening tools of frailty, the most accepted operational definitions are based on the recognition of frailty phenotypes or deficit accumulation-based frailty indexes. Intrinsic capacity, referred to as the total physical and mental capacities for individual to undertake daily tasks in everyday life, is another care model, including five domains. Similar or identical instruments have been used to assess frailty and intrinsic capacity. In the present narrative review, we outlined the biological rationale for integrating intrinsic capacity into frailty models and highlighted the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains. The vitality domain or energy metabolism-related capacity, is the highest order dimension and the basis of other intrinsic capacity domains. Vitality vulnerability manifests as a pre-frailty status in function-centered healthy aging. We provided a conceptual framework of frailty phenotypes and frailty indexes based on the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains, particularly vitality capacity. To facilitate the clinical translation of the framework, some potential energy metabolism-related biomarkers have also been proposed as critical components for assessing and screening vitality capacity in older age. The integrating framework not only provides testable theoretical hypotheses, particularly about vitality as a foundational element in aging, but could serve as a starting point for further research to unravel the mechanisms of frailty. It also improves cost-effectiveness for optimizing aging interventions in clinical healthcare and public health policies of healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"273-286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S509990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment and management of two function-centered clinical care models, frailty and intrinsic capacity decline have been proposed to achieve healthy aging. To implement these two care models, several different guidelines have been advocated by different health organizations, which has resulted in confusion and cost-ineffective results in healthcare practice. Although there are various operational definitions and screening tools of frailty, the most accepted operational definitions are based on the recognition of frailty phenotypes or deficit accumulation-based frailty indexes. Intrinsic capacity, referred to as the total physical and mental capacities for individual to undertake daily tasks in everyday life, is another care model, including five domains. Similar or identical instruments have been used to assess frailty and intrinsic capacity. In the present narrative review, we outlined the biological rationale for integrating intrinsic capacity into frailty models and highlighted the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains. The vitality domain or energy metabolism-related capacity, is the highest order dimension and the basis of other intrinsic capacity domains. Vitality vulnerability manifests as a pre-frailty status in function-centered healthy aging. We provided a conceptual framework of frailty phenotypes and frailty indexes based on the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains, particularly vitality capacity. To facilitate the clinical translation of the framework, some potential energy metabolism-related biomarkers have also been proposed as critical components for assessing and screening vitality capacity in older age. The integrating framework not only provides testable theoretical hypotheses, particularly about vitality as a foundational element in aging, but could serve as a starting point for further research to unravel the mechanisms of frailty. It also improves cost-effectiveness for optimizing aging interventions in clinical healthcare and public health policies of healthy aging.

将内在能力整合到脆弱模型中的生物学原理。
提出了以功能为中心的虚弱和内在能力下降两种临床护理模式的评估和管理,以实现健康老龄化。为了实现这两种护理模式,不同的卫生组织倡导了几种不同的指导方针,这导致了医疗保健实践中的混乱和成本效率低下的结果。尽管有各种各样的脆弱性的操作定义和筛选工具,但最被接受的操作定义是基于对脆弱性表型的识别或基于缺陷积累的脆弱性指数。内在能力是指个体在日常生活中承担日常任务的全部身心能力,是另一种护理模式,包括五个领域。已经使用了类似或相同的工具来评估脆弱性和内在能力。在当前的叙述回顾中,我们概述了将内在能力整合到脆弱性模型中的生物学原理,并强调了内在能力域的等级和能量依赖顺序。活力域或能量代谢相关的能力,是最高阶维度和其他内在能力域的基础。活力脆弱性表现为以功能为中心的健康老龄化的前脆弱状态。我们提供了一个基于内在能力域的层次和能量依赖顺序的脆弱表型和脆弱指数的概念框架,特别是活力能力。为了促进该框架的临床翻译,一些潜在的能量代谢相关生物标志物也被提出作为评估和筛选老年人活力能力的关键组成部分。整合框架不仅提供了可测试的理论假设,特别是关于活力作为衰老的基本因素,而且可以作为进一步研究揭示脆弱机制的起点。它还提高了在临床保健和健康老龄化公共卫生政策中优化老龄化干预措施的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信