Zhuowei Yu, Madia Lozupone, Jie Chen, Zhijun Bao, Qingwei Ruan, Francesco Panza
{"title":"The Biological Rationale for Integrating Intrinsic Capacity Into Frailty Models.","authors":"Zhuowei Yu, Madia Lozupone, Jie Chen, Zhijun Bao, Qingwei Ruan, Francesco Panza","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S509990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment and management of two function-centered clinical care models, frailty and intrinsic capacity decline have been proposed to achieve healthy aging. To implement these two care models, several different guidelines have been advocated by different health organizations, which has resulted in confusion and cost-ineffective results in healthcare practice. Although there are various operational definitions and screening tools of frailty, the most accepted operational definitions are based on the recognition of frailty phenotypes or deficit accumulation-based frailty indexes. Intrinsic capacity, referred to as the total physical and mental capacities for individual to undertake daily tasks in everyday life, is another care model, including five domains. Similar or identical instruments have been used to assess frailty and intrinsic capacity. In the present narrative review, we outlined the biological rationale for integrating intrinsic capacity into frailty models and highlighted the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains. The vitality domain or energy metabolism-related capacity, is the highest order dimension and the basis of other intrinsic capacity domains. Vitality vulnerability manifests as a pre-frailty status in function-centered healthy aging. We provided a conceptual framework of frailty phenotypes and frailty indexes based on the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains, particularly vitality capacity. To facilitate the clinical translation of the framework, some potential energy metabolism-related biomarkers have also been proposed as critical components for assessing and screening vitality capacity in older age. The integrating framework not only provides testable theoretical hypotheses, particularly about vitality as a foundational element in aging, but could serve as a starting point for further research to unravel the mechanisms of frailty. It also improves cost-effectiveness for optimizing aging interventions in clinical healthcare and public health policies of healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"20 ","pages":"273-286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S509990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The assessment and management of two function-centered clinical care models, frailty and intrinsic capacity decline have been proposed to achieve healthy aging. To implement these two care models, several different guidelines have been advocated by different health organizations, which has resulted in confusion and cost-ineffective results in healthcare practice. Although there are various operational definitions and screening tools of frailty, the most accepted operational definitions are based on the recognition of frailty phenotypes or deficit accumulation-based frailty indexes. Intrinsic capacity, referred to as the total physical and mental capacities for individual to undertake daily tasks in everyday life, is another care model, including five domains. Similar or identical instruments have been used to assess frailty and intrinsic capacity. In the present narrative review, we outlined the biological rationale for integrating intrinsic capacity into frailty models and highlighted the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains. The vitality domain or energy metabolism-related capacity, is the highest order dimension and the basis of other intrinsic capacity domains. Vitality vulnerability manifests as a pre-frailty status in function-centered healthy aging. We provided a conceptual framework of frailty phenotypes and frailty indexes based on the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains, particularly vitality capacity. To facilitate the clinical translation of the framework, some potential energy metabolism-related biomarkers have also been proposed as critical components for assessing and screening vitality capacity in older age. The integrating framework not only provides testable theoretical hypotheses, particularly about vitality as a foundational element in aging, but could serve as a starting point for further research to unravel the mechanisms of frailty. It also improves cost-effectiveness for optimizing aging interventions in clinical healthcare and public health policies of healthy aging.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.