Ultrasound-based Velocity Vector Imaging in the Carotid Bifurcation: Repeatability and an In Vivo Comparison With 4-D Flow MRI

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Janna Ruisch , Joosje M.K. de Bakker , Majorie van Helvert , Maxime J.P. Schoonbrood , Erik Groot Jebbink , Suzanne Holewijn , Michel M.P.J. Reijnen , Chris L. de Korte , Anne E.C.M. Saris
{"title":"Ultrasound-based Velocity Vector Imaging in the Carotid Bifurcation: Repeatability and an In Vivo Comparison With 4-D Flow MRI","authors":"Janna Ruisch ,&nbsp;Joosje M.K. de Bakker ,&nbsp;Majorie van Helvert ,&nbsp;Maxime J.P. Schoonbrood ,&nbsp;Erik Groot Jebbink ,&nbsp;Suzanne Holewijn ,&nbsp;Michel M.P.J. Reijnen ,&nbsp;Chris L. de Korte ,&nbsp;Anne E.C.M. Saris","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Ultrasound-based velocity vector imaging (US-VVI) is a promising technique to gain insight into complex blood flow patterns that play an important role in atherosclerosis. However, <em>in vivo</em> validation of the 2-D velocity vector fields in the carotid bifurcation, using an adaptive velocity compounding method, is lacking. Its performance was validated <em>in vivo</em> against 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, the repeatability of US-VVI was determined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>High frame rate US-VVI, which was repeated three times, and 4-D flow MRI data were acquired of the carotid bifurcation of 20 healthy volunteers. A semiautomatic registration of all US-VVI (<em>n</em> = 60) and 4-D flow MRI data was performed. The 2-D velocity vector fields were compared using cosine similarity and the root-mean-square error of the velocity magnitude. Temporal velocity profiles from the common carotid artery and internal carotid artery were compared. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement of US-VVI was determined for peak systolic velocities and end-diastolic velocities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The registration was successful in 83% of cases. The 2-D velocity vector fields matched well between modalities, which is supported by high cosine similarities and low root-mean-square error of the velocity magnitudes. Temporal profiles showed high resemblance, with similarity indices of 0.87 and 0.80, and mean peak systolic velocity differences of 0.91 and 7.9 cm/s in the common carotid artery and internal carotid artery, respectively. Good repeatability of US-VVI was shown with a highest bias and standard deviation of 1.7 and 11.7 cm/s, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Good agreements were found of both vector angles and velocity magnitudes between US-VVI and 4-D flow MRI. Given the high spatiotemporal resolution, US-VVI enables the capture of small recirculating regions of short duration that are missed by 4-D flow MRI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 6","pages":"Pages 969-976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Ultrasound-based velocity vector imaging (US-VVI) is a promising technique to gain insight into complex blood flow patterns that play an important role in atherosclerosis. However, in vivo validation of the 2-D velocity vector fields in the carotid bifurcation, using an adaptive velocity compounding method, is lacking. Its performance was validated in vivo against 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, the repeatability of US-VVI was determined.

Methods

High frame rate US-VVI, which was repeated three times, and 4-D flow MRI data were acquired of the carotid bifurcation of 20 healthy volunteers. A semiautomatic registration of all US-VVI (n = 60) and 4-D flow MRI data was performed. The 2-D velocity vector fields were compared using cosine similarity and the root-mean-square error of the velocity magnitude. Temporal velocity profiles from the common carotid artery and internal carotid artery were compared. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement of US-VVI was determined for peak systolic velocities and end-diastolic velocities.

Results

The registration was successful in 83% of cases. The 2-D velocity vector fields matched well between modalities, which is supported by high cosine similarities and low root-mean-square error of the velocity magnitudes. Temporal profiles showed high resemblance, with similarity indices of 0.87 and 0.80, and mean peak systolic velocity differences of 0.91 and 7.9 cm/s in the common carotid artery and internal carotid artery, respectively. Good repeatability of US-VVI was shown with a highest bias and standard deviation of 1.7 and 11.7 cm/s, respectively.

Conclusion

Good agreements were found of both vector angles and velocity magnitudes between US-VVI and 4-D flow MRI. Given the high spatiotemporal resolution, US-VVI enables the capture of small recirculating regions of short duration that are missed by 4-D flow MRI.
基于超声的颈动脉分叉速度矢量成像:可重复性和与4-D血流MRI的体内比较。
目的:基于超声的速度矢量成像(US-VVI)是一种很有前途的技术,可以深入了解在动脉粥样硬化中起重要作用的复杂血流模式。然而,缺乏使用自适应速度复合方法对颈动脉分叉的二维速度矢量场进行体内验证。在体内通过4-D流动磁共振成像(MRI)验证了其性能。此外,还确定了US-VVI的重复性。方法:对20名健康志愿者进行3次高帧率US-VVI扫描,获取颈动脉分叉的4维血流MRI数据。对所有US-VVI (n = 60)和4-D血流MRI数据进行半自动登记。利用余弦相似度和速度大小均方根误差对二维速度矢量场进行了比较。比较颈总动脉和颈内动脉的时间速度分布。确定US-VVI的峰值收缩速度和舒张末期速度的观察者间和观察者内一致性。结果:注册成功率83%。二维速度矢量场在模态之间匹配良好,这得益于速度幅值的高余弦相似度和低均方根误差。颈总动脉和颈内动脉的时间谱相似度较高,相似指数分别为0.87和0.80,平均峰值收缩速度差分别为0.91和7.9 cm/s。US-VVI重复性好,偏差最高,标准差分别为1.7 cm/s和11.7 cm/s。结论:US-VVI与4-D血流MRI在矢量角度和速度大小上有很好的一致性。考虑到高时空分辨率,US-VVI能够捕捉到4-D血流MRI无法捕捉到的短时间小的再循环区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信