Postural factors contributing to reaching speed and accuracy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Nicole J Chimera, Sarah Bohunicky, Cheryl Glazebrook, Trisha Scribbans
{"title":"Postural factors contributing to reaching speed and accuracy.","authors":"Nicole J Chimera, Sarah Bohunicky, Cheryl Glazebrook, Trisha Scribbans","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2025.2466919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> Occupational reaching tasks performed with faulty postures may contribute to inefficient movement patterns that could lead to injury. Understanding relationships between posture and muscle activation during reaching tasks may elucidate movement patterns that increase occupational injury risk in workers. This study assessed whether postural factors and muscle activation predict forward reaching movement performance and accuracy. <i>Methods</i>. Predictor variables of forward shoulder posture (FSP), pectoral length, upper (UT), middle (MT) and lower trapezius (LT) and pectoralis major (PM) muscle activation, and UT:PM, MT:PM, and LT:PM co-activation during forward reaching were analysed for 56 individuals. Sequential linear regression equations assessed reaching variance. <i>Results</i>. For females, FSP, UT activation, and UT:PM co-activation explained 36% of reaction time (RT) variance, and MT:PM co-activation explained 14% of endpoint accuracy variance. For males, MT:PM co-activation explained 17% of movement time (MvT) variance, and FSP, MT:PM co-activation and MT explained 23% of accuracy variance. <i>Conclusion.</i> Increased co-activation was a predictor of movement performance; however, performance outcome variables differed between males (MvT) and females (RT). Muscle co-activation coupled with FSP and posterior shoulder muscle activation resulted in differences in predicting reaching performance variance. Practitioners might consider evaluating these muscle activation and postural factors in occupational reaching tasks.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04944745.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2466919","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. Occupational reaching tasks performed with faulty postures may contribute to inefficient movement patterns that could lead to injury. Understanding relationships between posture and muscle activation during reaching tasks may elucidate movement patterns that increase occupational injury risk in workers. This study assessed whether postural factors and muscle activation predict forward reaching movement performance and accuracy. Methods. Predictor variables of forward shoulder posture (FSP), pectoral length, upper (UT), middle (MT) and lower trapezius (LT) and pectoralis major (PM) muscle activation, and UT:PM, MT:PM, and LT:PM co-activation during forward reaching were analysed for 56 individuals. Sequential linear regression equations assessed reaching variance. Results. For females, FSP, UT activation, and UT:PM co-activation explained 36% of reaction time (RT) variance, and MT:PM co-activation explained 14% of endpoint accuracy variance. For males, MT:PM co-activation explained 17% of movement time (MvT) variance, and FSP, MT:PM co-activation and MT explained 23% of accuracy variance. Conclusion. Increased co-activation was a predictor of movement performance; however, performance outcome variables differed between males (MvT) and females (RT). Muscle co-activation coupled with FSP and posterior shoulder muscle activation resulted in differences in predicting reaching performance variance. Practitioners might consider evaluating these muscle activation and postural factors in occupational reaching tasks.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04944745.

姿势因素有助于达到速度和准确性。
目标。以错误的姿势进行的职业接触任务可能会导致低效的运动模式,从而导致受伤。了解到达任务时姿势和肌肉激活之间的关系可以阐明增加工人职业伤害风险的运动模式。本研究评估了姿势因素和肌肉激活是否能预测前伸运动的表现和准确性。方法。分析了56例个体前伸时前肩姿势(FSP)、胸长、上斜方肌(UT)、中斜方肌(MT)和下斜方肌(LT)和胸大肌(PM)肌肉激活以及UT:PM、MT:PM和LT:PM共激活的预测变量。序列线性回归方程评估达到方差。结果。对于女性,FSP、UT激活和UT:PM共激活解释了36%的反应时间(RT)方差,MT:PM共激活解释了14%的终点准确性方差。对于男性,MT:PM共激活解释了17%的运动时间(MvT)方差,FSP、MT:PM共激活和MT解释了23%的准确性方差。结论。增加的共激活是运动表现的预测因子;然而,表现结果变量在男性(MvT)和女性(RT)之间存在差异。肌肉共同激活加上FSP和后肩肌肉激活导致预测达到性能方差的差异。在职业接触任务中,从业者可以考虑评估这些肌肉激活和姿势因素。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04944745。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信