{"title":"Mandarin Chinese Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Caregiver Analysis of Reported Experiences With Swallowing Disorders Screening Tool.","authors":"Lancai Zhao, Sihan Li, Yufeng Qiu, Xueqiong Zhu, Jing Shao, Huafang Zhang","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The caregiver burden of individuals with dysphagia is a major concern. Currently, assessment tools specifically designed for this population are lacking. The present study aimed to translate the Caregiver Analysis of Reported Experiences with Swallowing Disorders (CARES) Questionnaire into Mandarin Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study analyzed the psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire using classical measurement theory and Rasch model analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Classical measurement theory: The item-level content validity index of the Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire ranged from .83 to 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index ranged from .93 to .95. The correlation coefficient between the total scores, subscale scores of the CARES questionnaire, and Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview scores was between .82 and .87 (<i>p</i> < .01). There were significant relationships between dysphagia-specific burden (CARES) and perceived swallowing impairment (Eating Assessment Tool-10) and diet restrictiveness (International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale). The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire was .81. Item response theory: The Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire was unidimensional. The item difficulty and individual ability were evenly distributed. The total item reliability was .96, the person reliability was .79, the item separation index was 4.95, and the person separation index was 1.93.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity and can be utilized as a specific assessment tool for evaluating the informal caregiver burden of individuals with dysphagia.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":"34 2","pages":"505-519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The caregiver burden of individuals with dysphagia is a major concern. Currently, assessment tools specifically designed for this population are lacking. The present study aimed to translate the Caregiver Analysis of Reported Experiences with Swallowing Disorders (CARES) Questionnaire into Mandarin Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties.
Method: This study analyzed the psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire using classical measurement theory and Rasch model analysis.
Results: Classical measurement theory: The item-level content validity index of the Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire ranged from .83 to 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index ranged from .93 to .95. The correlation coefficient between the total scores, subscale scores of the CARES questionnaire, and Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview scores was between .82 and .87 (p < .01). There were significant relationships between dysphagia-specific burden (CARES) and perceived swallowing impairment (Eating Assessment Tool-10) and diet restrictiveness (International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Functional Diet Scale). The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire was .81. Item response theory: The Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire was unidimensional. The item difficulty and individual ability were evenly distributed. The total item reliability was .96, the person reliability was .79, the item separation index was 4.95, and the person separation index was 1.93.
Conclusion: The Mandarin Chinese version of the CARES questionnaire demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity and can be utilized as a specific assessment tool for evaluating the informal caregiver burden of individuals with dysphagia.
期刊介绍：
Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
