Which urinary incontinence inquiry form should be used in women with urinary incontinence?

IF 1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Önder Tosun, Çetin Kılıççı, Pınar Kumru, Sultan Seren Karakuş, Reyyan Gökçen İşcan, Zeynep Tosun, Ali Aras, Çağla Yıldırım Varol, Andrea Tinelli
{"title":"Which urinary incontinence inquiry form should be used in women with urinary incontinence?","authors":"Önder Tosun, Çetin Kılıççı, Pınar Kumru, Sultan Seren Karakuş, Reyyan Gökçen İşcan, Zeynep Tosun, Ali Aras, Çağla Yıldırım Varol, Andrea Tinelli","doi":"10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.08566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine urinary incontinence (UI) inquiry forms to be used in the follow-up of incontinence according to UI type.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Health Science Hospital between 2020 and 2022. A total of 449 patients referred for urodynamic evaluation for UI were included herein, and clinical results regarding UI types were collected and reviewed. The validated urogenital distress inventory 6 (UDI-6), incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7), and incontinence quality of life (I-QOL) questionnaires were completed by all patients. The demographic data of the patients, total questionnaire scores, and urodynamic results were compared between the groups according to UI type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine percent of the participants were in the menopausal period, and 41% required regular ped use. A total of 52.1% of patients experienced 5 years of UI. Stress incontinence was reported in 4.2% of patients, urge incontinence in 10%, stress-predominant mixed UI in 59.2%, and urge-predominant mixed UI in 24.7%. The mean ± standard deviation values were 59.62±20.62 for the UDI-6, 54.72±24.84 for the IIQ-7, 62.41±23.52 for the total I-QOL, 21.85±8.55 for the I-QOL limitation of behaviors subscale, 27.99±10.86 for the I-QOL psychological influence subscale, and 12.64±5.72 for the I-QOL social isolation subscale. A statistically significant difference was assessed between the urodynamics results and the UDI-6, IIQ-7, total I-QOL, I-QOL limitation of behaviors subscale, I-QOL psychological influence subscale, and I-QOL social isolation subscale scores (p<0.001 for all variables).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients diagnosed with UI, when each of the 3 questionnaires for UI diagnosis was compared, the best inquiry questionnaire for the prediction of mixed-type UI was the UDI-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":45340,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"22 1","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.08566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine urinary incontinence (UI) inquiry forms to be used in the follow-up of incontinence according to UI type.

Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Health Science Hospital between 2020 and 2022. A total of 449 patients referred for urodynamic evaluation for UI were included herein, and clinical results regarding UI types were collected and reviewed. The validated urogenital distress inventory 6 (UDI-6), incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7), and incontinence quality of life (I-QOL) questionnaires were completed by all patients. The demographic data of the patients, total questionnaire scores, and urodynamic results were compared between the groups according to UI type.

Results: Forty-nine percent of the participants were in the menopausal period, and 41% required regular ped use. A total of 52.1% of patients experienced 5 years of UI. Stress incontinence was reported in 4.2% of patients, urge incontinence in 10%, stress-predominant mixed UI in 59.2%, and urge-predominant mixed UI in 24.7%. The mean ± standard deviation values were 59.62±20.62 for the UDI-6, 54.72±24.84 for the IIQ-7, 62.41±23.52 for the total I-QOL, 21.85±8.55 for the I-QOL limitation of behaviors subscale, 27.99±10.86 for the I-QOL psychological influence subscale, and 12.64±5.72 for the I-QOL social isolation subscale. A statistically significant difference was assessed between the urodynamics results and the UDI-6, IIQ-7, total I-QOL, I-QOL limitation of behaviors subscale, I-QOL psychological influence subscale, and I-QOL social isolation subscale scores (p<0.001 for all variables).

Conclusion: In patients diagnosed with UI, when each of the 3 questionnaires for UI diagnosis was compared, the best inquiry questionnaire for the prediction of mixed-type UI was the UDI-6.

女性尿失禁应使用哪一种尿失禁调查表?
目的:根据尿失禁类型确定尿失禁(UI)问询表用于尿失禁随访。材料与方法:本前瞻性队列研究于2020 - 2022年在中国卫生科学大学附属医院进行。本研究共纳入449例转诊进行尿动力学评估的患者,收集并回顾尿失禁类型的临床结果。所有患者均完成经验证的泌尿生殖窘迫问卷6 (UDI-6)、尿失禁影响问卷(IIQ-7)和尿失禁生活质量问卷(I-QOL)。根据尿失禁类型比较两组患者人口学资料、问卷总得分及尿动力学结果。结果:49%的参与者处于绝经期,41%的参与者需要定期使用ped。共有52.1%的患者经历了5年的尿失禁。4.2%的患者出现应激性尿失禁,10%的患者出现急迫性尿失禁,59.2%的患者出现应激性混合性尿失禁,24.7%的患者出现急迫性尿失禁。平均±标准差值分别为:UDI-6 59.62±20.62、IIQ-7 54.72±24.84、总I-QOL 62.41±23.52、行为限制I-QOL 21.85±8.55、心理影响I-QOL 27.99±10.86、社会隔离I-QOL 12.64±5.72。尿动力学结果与UDI-6、IIQ-7、总I-QOL、行为子量表I-QOL限制、I-QOL心理影响子量表、I-QOL社会隔离子量表得分比较,差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:在诊断为尿失禁的患者中,在比较3份诊断尿失禁问卷时,预测混合型尿失禁的最佳询问问卷为UDI-6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信