Clinical observation on the efficacy of ringheaded thumb-tack needle therapy combined with tuina and active functional exercise in the treatment of neck-type cervical spondylosis.

Q3 Medicine
Zhi-Long Zhang, Tian-Xin Chen, Yu-Jia Zhanghan, Tian-Xiang Xin, Yu-Qi Zhu, Sheng-Ping Yang
{"title":"Clinical observation on the efficacy of ringheaded thumb-tack needle therapy combined with tuina and active functional exercise in the treatment of neck-type cervical spondylosis.","authors":"Zhi-Long Zhang, Tian-Xin Chen, Yu-Jia Zhanghan, Tian-Xiang Xin, Yu-Qi Zhu, Sheng-Ping Yang","doi":"10.13702/j.1000-0607.20230798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the clinical efficacy of acupressure therapy combined with Tuina and active functional exercise in the treatment of neck-type cervical spondylosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients with cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with Tuina and active functional exercise. Tuina therapy lasted 10-15 min per session, twice a week for 4 weeks. Functional exercises were performed once in the morning and once in the evening, each session lasting about 10 min, for a total of 4 weeks. The experimental group received the same treatment as the control group combined with ringheaded thumb-tack needle therapy which was applied to 5 Ashi points, with needle retention for 3 days followed by 1 day of rest, for a total of 4 weeks. The neck disability index (NDI) and the short-form of McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) including visual analog scale (VAS), present pain intensity (PPI) and pain rating index (PRI) were used before treatment, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks of treatment. The modified Macnab efficacy evaluation criteria were used to assess treatment outcomes, and safety was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with baseline, both groups showed significant reductions in NDI, VAS, PPI, and PRI scores after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment (<i>P</i><0.01). The improvement in the experimental group was significantly greater than that in the control group (<i>P</i><0.05). The clinical efficacy rate (excellent and good) was 60.0% (18/30) in the experimental group, compared to 30.0% (9/30) in the control group, with the experimental group showing better clinical outcomes (<i>P</i>< 0.05). No adverse reactions were reported during the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acupressure therapy combined with Tuina and active functional exercise can effectively improve symptoms such as neck dysfunction and pain in patients with cervical spondylosis with neck syndrome. The addition of acupressure therapy significantly enhances the clinical efficacy of Tuina and functional exercise, with confirmed therapeutic benefits and good safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":34919,"journal":{"name":"针刺研究","volume":"50 2","pages":"197-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"针刺研究","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13702/j.1000-0607.20230798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the clinical efficacy of acupressure therapy combined with Tuina and active functional exercise in the treatment of neck-type cervical spondylosis.

Methods: Sixty patients with cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with Tuina and active functional exercise. Tuina therapy lasted 10-15 min per session, twice a week for 4 weeks. Functional exercises were performed once in the morning and once in the evening, each session lasting about 10 min, for a total of 4 weeks. The experimental group received the same treatment as the control group combined with ringheaded thumb-tack needle therapy which was applied to 5 Ashi points, with needle retention for 3 days followed by 1 day of rest, for a total of 4 weeks. The neck disability index (NDI) and the short-form of McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) including visual analog scale (VAS), present pain intensity (PPI) and pain rating index (PRI) were used before treatment, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks of treatment. The modified Macnab efficacy evaluation criteria were used to assess treatment outcomes, and safety was also evaluated.

Results: Compared with baseline, both groups showed significant reductions in NDI, VAS, PPI, and PRI scores after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment (P<0.01). The improvement in the experimental group was significantly greater than that in the control group (P<0.05). The clinical efficacy rate (excellent and good) was 60.0% (18/30) in the experimental group, compared to 30.0% (9/30) in the control group, with the experimental group showing better clinical outcomes (P< 0.05). No adverse reactions were reported during the study.

Conclusions: Acupressure therapy combined with Tuina and active functional exercise can effectively improve symptoms such as neck dysfunction and pain in patients with cervical spondylosis with neck syndrome. The addition of acupressure therapy significantly enhances the clinical efficacy of Tuina and functional exercise, with confirmed therapeutic benefits and good safety.

环形指钉针疗法配合推拿、积极功能运动治疗颈型颈椎病的临床观察
目的:探讨指压疗法结合推拿和主动功能运动治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:60例颈椎病患者随机分为对照组和实验组,每组各30例。对照组采用推拿配合积极功能运动治疗。推拿治疗每次10-15分钟,每周2次,连续4周。早晚各做一次功能锻炼,每次10分钟左右,共4周。实验组采用与对照组相同的治疗方法,联合环形指钉针治疗,分别施针5个阿石穴,留针3 d后休息1 d,共4周。治疗前、治疗后2周和治疗后4周分别采用颈部失能指数(NDI)和短形式McGill疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ),包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、现时疼痛强度(PPI)和疼痛评分指数(PRI)。采用改良的Macnab疗效评价标准评估治疗结果,并对安全性进行评价。结果:与基线比较,两组治疗2周、4周后NDI、VAS、PPI、PRI评分均显著降低(PPP< 0.05)。研究期间未见不良反应报告。结论:指压疗法结合推拿和积极的功能锻炼可有效改善颈椎病伴颈综合征患者的颈部功能障碍、疼痛等症状。穴位按摩疗法的加入明显提高了推拿和功能运动的临床疗效,治疗效果得到证实,安全性好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
针刺研究
针刺研究 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acupuncture Research was founded in 1976. It is an acupuncture academic journal supervised by the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, co-sponsored by the Institute of Acupuncture of the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and the Chinese Acupuncture Association. This journal is characterized by "basic experimental research as the main focus, taking into account clinical research and reporting". It is the only journal in my country that focuses on reporting the mechanism of action of acupuncture. The journal has been changed to a monthly journal since 2018, published on the 25th of each month, and printed in full color. The manuscript acceptance rate is about 10%, and provincial and above funded projects account for about 80% of the total published papers, reflecting the latest scientific research results in the acupuncture field and has a high academic level. Main columns: mechanism discussion, clinical research, acupuncture anesthesia, meridians and acupoints, theoretical discussion, ideas and methods, literature research, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信