Comparison of Omron and ActiGraph monitors in estimating daily step counts and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity in free-living adults.
{"title":"Comparison of Omron and ActiGraph monitors in estimating daily step counts and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity in free-living adults.","authors":"Hiroko Shimura, Shinpei Okada, Kazushi Maruo, Kaori Daimaru, Naoki Deguchi, Yoshinori Fujiwara, Hiroyuki Sasai","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the Omron Active style Pro HJA-750C (OM) and the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT (AG) in estimating daily physical activity-step counts and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA)-in free-living adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Japanese adults without gait abnormalities wore both devices during waking hours for seven consecutive days. Data were aggregated into daily steps and MVPA. A valid day required ≥10 hours of AG wear time with ≥100 and <50 000 accumulated steps from both devices. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots with multilevel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final dataset included 129 participants (age 23-89 years, 50.4% women), totalling 887 observations (5-7 daily observations/participant). OM estimated an overall mean of 7456 (SE 253) steps/day and 68.9 (SE 2.8) min/day in MVPA. Bland-Altman plots showed that OM estimated -56 steps/day (95% limits of agreement (LoA) = -1599; 1486) and +23 min/day (LoA = -17; 63) in MVPA compared with AG. Differences tended to increase with higher mean estimates for both step counts and MVPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OM estimated substantially more daily time spent in MVPA but showed similar daily step counts compared with AG. Differences were larger with higher activity levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"e002402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the Omron Active style Pro HJA-750C (OM) and the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT (AG) in estimating daily physical activity-step counts and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA)-in free-living adults.
Methods: Japanese adults without gait abnormalities wore both devices during waking hours for seven consecutive days. Data were aggregated into daily steps and MVPA. A valid day required ≥10 hours of AG wear time with ≥100 and <50 000 accumulated steps from both devices. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots with multilevel analysis.
Results: The final dataset included 129 participants (age 23-89 years, 50.4% women), totalling 887 observations (5-7 daily observations/participant). OM estimated an overall mean of 7456 (SE 253) steps/day and 68.9 (SE 2.8) min/day in MVPA. Bland-Altman plots showed that OM estimated -56 steps/day (95% limits of agreement (LoA) = -1599; 1486) and +23 min/day (LoA = -17; 63) in MVPA compared with AG. Differences tended to increase with higher mean estimates for both step counts and MVPA.
Conclusion: OM estimated substantially more daily time spent in MVPA but showed similar daily step counts compared with AG. Differences were larger with higher activity levels.