Levels of Processing Effects on Memory for Color-Object Associations.

IF 2.3 Q1 Psychology
Journal of Cognition Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/joc.437
Mirela Dubravac, Chhavi Sachdeva, Nicolas Rothen
{"title":"Levels of Processing Effects on Memory for Color-Object Associations.","authors":"Mirela Dubravac, Chhavi Sachdeva, Nicolas Rothen","doi":"10.5334/joc.437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The levels of processing effect demonstrates that deeper encoding (processing meaning) enhances memory retention more than shallow encoding (processing perceptual features). While extensively studied with verbal materials, limited research has addressed this effect using nonverbal materials such as pictures. Previous studies have used pleasantness judgments to induce deep encoding and judgments of straight lines to induce shallow encoding. However, these tasks confound level of processing with other factors like task relevance, self-reference, and attentional scope, offering alternative explanations for observed memory performance differences. This online study (<i>N</i> = 307) tested the levels of processing framework for pictures using novel encoding tasks to isolate the effect of semantic processing. The novel encoding tasks involved a size judgment. In the shallow encoding condition, participants compared the size of an object to the displayed size of a reference object presented on the screen. This is a perceptual comparison of two pictures. In the deep encoding condition, participants compared the size of an object to the real-life size of a reference object. This requires an understanding of the semantic meaning of the presented object. Our results showed better memory performance in deep encoding conditions (pleasantness judgment, real-life size judgment) than shallow encoding conditions (line judgment, displayed size judgment), supporting the levels of processing framework. Additionally, the new size judgment tasks minimized alternative explanatory factors, providing a clearer understanding of how semantic processing influences visual associative memory. These findings confirm the applicability of the levels of processing effect to nonverbal materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":32728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition","volume":"8 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The levels of processing effect demonstrates that deeper encoding (processing meaning) enhances memory retention more than shallow encoding (processing perceptual features). While extensively studied with verbal materials, limited research has addressed this effect using nonverbal materials such as pictures. Previous studies have used pleasantness judgments to induce deep encoding and judgments of straight lines to induce shallow encoding. However, these tasks confound level of processing with other factors like task relevance, self-reference, and attentional scope, offering alternative explanations for observed memory performance differences. This online study (N = 307) tested the levels of processing framework for pictures using novel encoding tasks to isolate the effect of semantic processing. The novel encoding tasks involved a size judgment. In the shallow encoding condition, participants compared the size of an object to the displayed size of a reference object presented on the screen. This is a perceptual comparison of two pictures. In the deep encoding condition, participants compared the size of an object to the real-life size of a reference object. This requires an understanding of the semantic meaning of the presented object. Our results showed better memory performance in deep encoding conditions (pleasantness judgment, real-life size judgment) than shallow encoding conditions (line judgment, displayed size judgment), supporting the levels of processing framework. Additionally, the new size judgment tasks minimized alternative explanatory factors, providing a clearer understanding of how semantic processing influences visual associative memory. These findings confirm the applicability of the levels of processing effect to nonverbal materials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颜色-对象联想记忆的加工效应水平。
加工效应水平表明,深层编码(加工意义)比浅层编码(加工知觉特征)更能增强记忆。虽然对语言材料进行了广泛的研究,但有限的研究利用非语言材料(如图片)来解决这种影响。以往的研究用愉悦性判断诱发深度编码,直线性判断诱发浅编码。然而,这些任务混淆了处理水平与其他因素,如任务相关性、自我参照和注意力范围,为观察到的记忆性能差异提供了另一种解释。本在线研究(N = 307)采用新颖的编码任务来隔离语义处理的影响,测试了图像处理框架的水平。新的编码任务涉及大小判断。在浅层编码条件下,参与者将物体的大小与屏幕上显示的参考物体的大小进行比较。这是两幅图片的感性比较。在深度编码条件下,参与者将物体的大小与现实生活中参考物体的大小进行比较。这需要理解所呈现对象的语义含义。结果表明,深度编码条件下(愉悦性判断、真实尺寸判断)的记忆性能优于浅层编码条件下(行判断、显示尺寸判断)的记忆性能。此外,新的大小判断任务最小化了其他解释因素,为语义加工如何影响视觉联想记忆提供了更清晰的理解。这些发现证实了加工效应水平对非语言材料的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition
Journal of Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信