Impact of therapeutic inertia in lipid-lowering therapy in patients at very high cardiovascular risk.

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Juan Cosín Sales, Carlos Escobar Cervantes, José Javier Gómez-Barrado, José Manuel Andreu Cayuelas, Abel García Del Egido, Jorge Joaquín Castro Martín, Ana Isabel Huelmos Rodrigo, Miguel Corbi-Pascual, Ariana Varela Cancelo, Rafael Vidal-Pérez, Leticia Fernandez-Friera, Enrique Santas Olmeda, Almudena Aguilera-Saborido, Antonio Fernández Romero, Antonio Sánchez Hidalgo, Francisco Pérez-Sádaba, Román Freixa-Pamias
{"title":"Impact of therapeutic inertia in lipid-lowering therapy in patients at very high cardiovascular risk.","authors":"Juan Cosín Sales, Carlos Escobar Cervantes, José Javier Gómez-Barrado, José Manuel Andreu Cayuelas, Abel García Del Egido, Jorge Joaquín Castro Martín, Ana Isabel Huelmos Rodrigo, Miguel Corbi-Pascual, Ariana Varela Cancelo, Rafael Vidal-Pérez, Leticia Fernandez-Friera, Enrique Santas Olmeda, Almudena Aguilera-Saborido, Antonio Fernández Romero, Antonio Sánchez Hidalgo, Francisco Pérez-Sádaba, Román Freixa-Pamias","doi":"10.1016/j.arteri.2025.500773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A high number of patients do not achieve the therapeutic goals set by clinical practice guidelines, despite the therapeutic alternatives that currently exist in lipid-lowering treatment (LLT). This study aimed to estimate the proportion of patients who have recently suffered an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who do not meet the therapeutic goal with LLT and the proportion of routine follow-up visits where therapeutic inertia (TI) occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study chart review was conducted in 13 Spanish centres. Patients aged ≥18 years who suffered an ACS event in the last two years and had received LLT were included. Sociodemographic, clinical, treatment and participating centre/physician-related variables were collected. TI was considered when a visit did not result in a change in the patient's therapy despite the non-achievement of therapeutic goals. Descriptive analysis was performed, and factors associated with TI were evaluated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>159 patients were included (mean age 63.08 years old, 80.5% male) and 338 follow-up visits were analysed. Over 50% of the patients did not meet the therapeutic target and TI was estimated in 39.13% of visits. Some factors were associated with a lower risk of TI: professional experience, number of vessels affected, and diabetes. And others with higher risk: being female, previous CV pathology and a complete revascularisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The management of patients after ACS is still suboptimal. The importance of clinical inertia in ACS remains a real awareness and active strategies will help mitigate this phenomenon due to the risk of recurrent ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":45230,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis","volume":" ","pages":"500773"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arteri.2025.500773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: A high number of patients do not achieve the therapeutic goals set by clinical practice guidelines, despite the therapeutic alternatives that currently exist in lipid-lowering treatment (LLT). This study aimed to estimate the proportion of patients who have recently suffered an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who do not meet the therapeutic goal with LLT and the proportion of routine follow-up visits where therapeutic inertia (TI) occurs.

Methods: A retrospective study chart review was conducted in 13 Spanish centres. Patients aged ≥18 years who suffered an ACS event in the last two years and had received LLT were included. Sociodemographic, clinical, treatment and participating centre/physician-related variables were collected. TI was considered when a visit did not result in a change in the patient's therapy despite the non-achievement of therapeutic goals. Descriptive analysis was performed, and factors associated with TI were evaluated using logistic regression.

Results: 159 patients were included (mean age 63.08 years old, 80.5% male) and 338 follow-up visits were analysed. Over 50% of the patients did not meet the therapeutic target and TI was estimated in 39.13% of visits. Some factors were associated with a lower risk of TI: professional experience, number of vessels affected, and diabetes. And others with higher risk: being female, previous CV pathology and a complete revascularisation.

Conclusion: The management of patients after ACS is still suboptimal. The importance of clinical inertia in ACS remains a real awareness and active strategies will help mitigate this phenomenon due to the risk of recurrent ACS.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis
Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: La publicación idónea para acceder tanto a los últimos originales de investigación como a formación médica continuada sobre la arteriosclerosis y su etiología, epidemiología, fisiopatología, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Además, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信