Comparison of PSOX (paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, S-1) and SOX (oxaliplatin, S-1) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II-III gastric cancer.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Fei-Yu Wang, Xiang-Ming Huang, Yu-Qing Cao, Jie Cao, Meng Song, Zhi-Jun Fang, Xin-En Huang
{"title":"Comparison of PSOX (paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, S-1) and SOX (oxaliplatin, S-1) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II-III gastric cancer.","authors":"Fei-Yu Wang, Xiang-Ming Huang, Yu-Qing Cao, Jie Cao, Meng Song, Zhi-Jun Fang, Xin-En Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03723-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjuvant chemotherapy is the conventional treatment for stage II and III gastric cancer(GC). Postoperative doublet chemotherapy has consistently shown improved survival outcomes in advanced-stage GC patients compared to single-agent regimens. Triplet regimens have shown significant survival benefits in the perioperative settings. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/S-1/oxaliplatin (PSOX) compared to S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III GC patients following D2 gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients with histologically confirmed stage II-III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, categorizing them into two groups. A total of 75 patients were included in PSOX group and 81 patients in the SOX group between April 2018 and August 2021. Patients in PSOX group received paclitaxel (120 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and S-1 (80 - 60 mg/d) per cycle, while those patients in SOX group were administrated oxaliplatin (130 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and S-1 (80-120 mg/d) per cycle. Patients from both groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores to assess differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3-year DFS rate was 78.2% for the PSOX group and 74.0% for the SOX group (P = 0.355), with a hazard ratio for peritoneal relapse of 0.287 (95% CI, 0.090-0.915; P = 0.035). Subgroup analysis indicated that stage IIIC GC patients in the PSOX group had a higher DFS rate than those in the SOX group(P = 0.032). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, as per the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, such as leucopenia (10.6% vs. 4.5%), neutropenia (10.6% vs. 9.1%), nausea/vomiting (4.5% vs. 3.0%), and diarrhea (4.5% vs. 3.0%) were relatively common in the PSOX group compared to the SOX group, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggested that adjuvant PSOX chemotherapy offers superior survival benefits compared to the SOX regimen in patients with staged IIIC GC after D2 gastrectomy. The incidence of adverse events with PSOX chemotherapy was comparable to that of SOX chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03723-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is the conventional treatment for stage II and III gastric cancer(GC). Postoperative doublet chemotherapy has consistently shown improved survival outcomes in advanced-stage GC patients compared to single-agent regimens. Triplet regimens have shown significant survival benefits in the perioperative settings. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/S-1/oxaliplatin (PSOX) compared to S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III GC patients following D2 gastrectomy.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with histologically confirmed stage II-III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, categorizing them into two groups. A total of 75 patients were included in PSOX group and 81 patients in the SOX group between April 2018 and August 2021. Patients in PSOX group received paclitaxel (120 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) and S-1 (80 - 60 mg/d) per cycle, while those patients in SOX group were administrated oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) and S-1 (80-120 mg/d) per cycle. Patients from both groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores to assess differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and safety.

Results: The 3-year DFS rate was 78.2% for the PSOX group and 74.0% for the SOX group (P = 0.355), with a hazard ratio for peritoneal relapse of 0.287 (95% CI, 0.090-0.915; P = 0.035). Subgroup analysis indicated that stage IIIC GC patients in the PSOX group had a higher DFS rate than those in the SOX group(P = 0.032). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, as per the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, such as leucopenia (10.6% vs. 4.5%), neutropenia (10.6% vs. 9.1%), nausea/vomiting (4.5% vs. 3.0%), and diarrhea (4.5% vs. 3.0%) were relatively common in the PSOX group compared to the SOX group, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion: Our findings suggested that adjuvant PSOX chemotherapy offers superior survival benefits compared to the SOX regimen in patients with staged IIIC GC after D2 gastrectomy. The incidence of adverse events with PSOX chemotherapy was comparable to that of SOX chemotherapy.

PSOX(紫杉醇、奥沙利铂,S-1)与SOX(奥沙利铂,S-1)作为II-III期胃癌术后辅助化疗的比较
背景:辅助化疗是II期和III期胃癌的常规治疗方法。与单药方案相比,术后双重化疗一直显示晚期胃癌患者的生存结果得到改善。三联体方案在围手术期显示出显著的生存效益。本回顾性研究评估了紫杉醇/S-1/奥沙利铂(PSOX)与S-1/奥沙利铂(SOX)作为D2胃切除术后II-III期胃癌患者术后辅助化疗的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析江苏省肿瘤医院经组织学证实行D2胃切除术的II-III期胃癌患者,将其分为两组。2018年4月至2021年8月,共纳入PSOX组75例患者,SOX组81例患者。PSOX组患者每周期给予紫杉醇(120 mg/m2)、奥沙利铂(100 mg/m2)和S-1 (80 ~ 60 mg/d), SOX组患者每周期给予奥沙利铂(130 mg/m2)和S-1 (80 ~ 120 mg/d)。两组患者按1:1比例匹配,使用倾向评分评估无病生存(DFS)和安全性的差异。结果:PSOX组3年DFS为78.2%,SOX组为74.0% (P = 0.355),腹膜复发的风险比为0.287 (95% CI, 0.090-0.915;p = 0.035)。亚组分析显示,PSOX组IIIC期GC患者的DFS率高于SOX组(P = 0.032)。根据美国国家癌症研究所共同毒性标准,3级或4级不良事件,如白细胞减少(10.6%对4.5%)、中性粒细胞减少(10.6%对9.1%)、恶心/呕吐(4.5%对3.0%)和腹泻(4.5%对3.0%)在PSOX组中相对常见,与SOX组相比,两组之间无统计学差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与SOX方案相比,辅助PSOX化疗方案在D2胃切除术后IIIC期胃癌患者中提供了更好的生存益处。PSOX化疗的不良事件发生率与SOX化疗相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信