Effect of superficial cervical plexus nerve block with Ropivacaine or a combination of different adjuvants on perioperative analgesia and quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing radical thyroid cancer surgery under general anesthesia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Xiaoyu Kang, Caifen Li, Liuyu Lu, Xiaotong Qin, Yonghao Wang, Yang Lu, Li Ma, Shaoliang Zhu, Zheng Gong
{"title":"Effect of superficial cervical plexus nerve block with Ropivacaine or a combination of different adjuvants on perioperative analgesia and quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing radical thyroid cancer surgery under general anesthesia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Xiaoyu Kang, Caifen Li, Liuyu Lu, Xiaotong Qin, Yonghao Wang, Yang Lu, Li Ma, Shaoliang Zhu, Zheng Gong","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03721-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus nerve blocks with Ropivacaine or a combination of different adjuvants on perioperative analgesia and quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing radical thyroid cancer surgery under general anesthesia with nerve monitoring without muscarinic maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 patients undergoing elective radical thyroid cancer surgery were randomly divided into four groups, with 35 cases in each group: general anesthesia alone group (Group C), general anesthesia + Ropivacaine group (Group R), general anesthesia + Ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine group (Group R1), and general anesthesia + Ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone group (Group R2). The primary observation index were postoperative resting and active Visual Analogue Score. The secondary observation index were hemodynamics, intraoperative sedative and analgesic medication use, postoperative analgesic requirements, postoperative recovery indicators, Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire scores, Quality of Postoperative Recovery-15 scores, and adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with group C, the resting and active VAS scores in group R were lower within 12 h after surgery (P < 0.05), the resting and active VAS scores in groups R1 and R2 were lower within 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Compared with group R, the VAS scores of patients in groups R1 and R2 were lower within 6 to 24 h after operation (P < 0.05). Compared with group R2, only the sedation score after extubation was higher in R1 group (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference in any other aspects (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bilateral superficial cervical plexus nerve blocks with Ropivacaine or a combination of different adjuvants are superior to general anesthesia alone in terms of intraoperative hemodynamics, the amount of sedative and analgesic drugs, and analgesic efficacy and quality of recovery in patients undergoing radical thyroid cancer surgery with nerve monitoring without muscarinic maintenance. Ropivacaine combined with an adjuvant has better analgesic effectiveness and quality of recovery than without an adjuvant, and Ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine has a better sedation level than dexamethasone.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03721-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus nerve blocks with Ropivacaine or a combination of different adjuvants on perioperative analgesia and quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing radical thyroid cancer surgery under general anesthesia with nerve monitoring without muscarinic maintenance.

Methods: A total of 140 patients undergoing elective radical thyroid cancer surgery were randomly divided into four groups, with 35 cases in each group: general anesthesia alone group (Group C), general anesthesia + Ropivacaine group (Group R), general anesthesia + Ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine group (Group R1), and general anesthesia + Ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone group (Group R2). The primary observation index were postoperative resting and active Visual Analogue Score. The secondary observation index were hemodynamics, intraoperative sedative and analgesic medication use, postoperative analgesic requirements, postoperative recovery indicators, Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire scores, Quality of Postoperative Recovery-15 scores, and adverse reactions.

Results: Compared with group C, the resting and active VAS scores in group R were lower within 12 h after surgery (P < 0.05), the resting and active VAS scores in groups R1 and R2 were lower within 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Compared with group R, the VAS scores of patients in groups R1 and R2 were lower within 6 to 24 h after operation (P < 0.05). Compared with group R2, only the sedation score after extubation was higher in R1 group (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference in any other aspects (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Bilateral superficial cervical plexus nerve blocks with Ropivacaine or a combination of different adjuvants are superior to general anesthesia alone in terms of intraoperative hemodynamics, the amount of sedative and analgesic drugs, and analgesic efficacy and quality of recovery in patients undergoing radical thyroid cancer surgery with nerve monitoring without muscarinic maintenance. Ropivacaine combined with an adjuvant has better analgesic effectiveness and quality of recovery than without an adjuvant, and Ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine has a better sedation level than dexamethasone.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信