Analysis of risk factors for dysphagia in patients after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sang-Sang Chen, Zhe-Bin Dong, Han-Ting Xiang, Zheng-Wei Chen, Tian-Ci Chen, Jia-Rong Huang, Chao Liang, Wei-Ming Yu
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors for dysphagia in patients after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.","authors":"Sang-Sang Chen, Zhe-Bin Dong, Han-Ting Xiang, Zheng-Wei Chen, Tian-Ci Chen, Jia-Rong Huang, Chao Liang, Wei-Ming Yu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.98535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer is among the most prevalent malignancies worldwide. Despite significant advancements in chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and neoadjuvant therapy, conventional surgical intervention remains the cornerstone of gastric cancer management. Improvements in surgical techniques, coupled with the use of staplers and other advanced instruments, have substantially reduced the incidence of complications and mortality following gastric cancer surgery. However, dysphagia remains a common postoperative complication.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To retrospectively investigate the potential factors contributing to dysphagia in patients who have undergone laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and to explore effective strategies for its postoperative management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from patients who underwent elective laparoscopic total gastrectomy at Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, between January 2018 and May 2022. A total of 115 eligible postoperative patients were included. Postoperatively, patients completed questionnaires and were categorized into two groups based on their responses: The dysphagia group (Eating Assessment Tool-10 score ≥ 3) and the non-dysphagia group (Eating Assessment Tool-10 score < 3). Risk factors associated with dysphagia following total gastrectomy were assessed using <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> tests, Fisher's exact tests, <i>t</i>-tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis further identified anastomotic style, prolonged intubation time, advanced age, and low albumin (ALB) levels as independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Implementing targeted preventive measures for high-risk groups may significantly enhance postoperative quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Univariate analysis revealed that anastomotic style, low serum ALB levels, advanced age, and prolonged intubation time were significantly associated with postoperative dysphagia in gastric cancer patients. Multivariate analysis further identified anastomotic style, prolonged intubation time, advanced age, and low ALB levels as independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Implementing targeted preventive measures for high-risk groups may significantly enhance postoperative quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 2","pages":"98535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.98535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer is among the most prevalent malignancies worldwide. Despite significant advancements in chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and neoadjuvant therapy, conventional surgical intervention remains the cornerstone of gastric cancer management. Improvements in surgical techniques, coupled with the use of staplers and other advanced instruments, have substantially reduced the incidence of complications and mortality following gastric cancer surgery. However, dysphagia remains a common postoperative complication.

Aim: To retrospectively investigate the potential factors contributing to dysphagia in patients who have undergone laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and to explore effective strategies for its postoperative management.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from patients who underwent elective laparoscopic total gastrectomy at Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, between January 2018 and May 2022. A total of 115 eligible postoperative patients were included. Postoperatively, patients completed questionnaires and were categorized into two groups based on their responses: The dysphagia group (Eating Assessment Tool-10 score ≥ 3) and the non-dysphagia group (Eating Assessment Tool-10 score < 3). Risk factors associated with dysphagia following total gastrectomy were assessed using χ 2 tests, Fisher's exact tests, t-tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Results: Multivariate analysis further identified anastomotic style, prolonged intubation time, advanced age, and low albumin (ALB) levels as independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Implementing targeted preventive measures for high-risk groups may significantly enhance postoperative quality of life.

Conclusion: Univariate analysis revealed that anastomotic style, low serum ALB levels, advanced age, and prolonged intubation time were significantly associated with postoperative dysphagia in gastric cancer patients. Multivariate analysis further identified anastomotic style, prolonged intubation time, advanced age, and low ALB levels as independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Implementing targeted preventive measures for high-risk groups may significantly enhance postoperative quality of life.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信