Fluorescent Microscopy: A Useful and Adjunct Tool in Leprosy Diagnosis: A Cross Sectional Study.

Q3 Medicine
Iranian Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.30699/ijp.2024.2023590.3263
Swati Soni, Vaishali Walke, Dinesh Asati, Anand Maurya, Sramana Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"Fluorescent Microscopy: A Useful and Adjunct Tool in Leprosy Diagnosis: A Cross Sectional Study.","authors":"Swati Soni, Vaishali Walke, Dinesh Asati, Anand Maurya, Sramana Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.30699/ijp.2024.2023590.3263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Fite-Faraco (FF) is the routine staining method used to demonstrate the presence of <i>Mycobacterium leprae</i> in tissue sections. Fluorescent microscopy (FM) can help visualize lepra bacilli better. The present study compares two methodologies, fluorescent microscopy, and Fite-Faraco, in detecting Mycobacterium leprae in tissue sections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histopathology of skin biopsies in 60 cases of Hansen's were evaluated with FF stain. The performance of Auramine- Rhodamine Fluroscencent stain was compared with conventional FF staining in identifying Lepra bacilli.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 clinically and histopathologically confirmed cases of Hansen's disease were included in this ambispective study. The cases were sub-classified into various histological categories. Auramine-rhodamine fluorescent staining was performed and examined under a fluorescent microscope with an LED light illuminator. The bacteriological index (BI) was calculated under an oil immersion field for both Fite-Faraco (FF) staining and fluorescent microscopy (FM), graded from zero to six plus according to Ridley's logarithmic scale. Lepra bacilli were identified in 70% of patients on FF staining, while fluorescent microscopy showed positivity in 80%. The mean BI calculated by FM (2.48) was significantly higher than that by the FF method (2.18), and more multibacillary disease was identified by fluorescent staining compared to FF staining.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is advantageous to use fluorescent microscopy as an adjunct to conventional Fite-Faraco stain especially in cases where the latter fails to detect lepra bacilli and in a clinically suspected multibacillary disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":38900,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pathology","volume":"20 1","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijp.2024.2023590.3263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objective: Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Fite-Faraco (FF) is the routine staining method used to demonstrate the presence of Mycobacterium leprae in tissue sections. Fluorescent microscopy (FM) can help visualize lepra bacilli better. The present study compares two methodologies, fluorescent microscopy, and Fite-Faraco, in detecting Mycobacterium leprae in tissue sections.

Methods: Histopathology of skin biopsies in 60 cases of Hansen's were evaluated with FF stain. The performance of Auramine- Rhodamine Fluroscencent stain was compared with conventional FF staining in identifying Lepra bacilli.

Results: A total of 60 clinically and histopathologically confirmed cases of Hansen's disease were included in this ambispective study. The cases were sub-classified into various histological categories. Auramine-rhodamine fluorescent staining was performed and examined under a fluorescent microscope with an LED light illuminator. The bacteriological index (BI) was calculated under an oil immersion field for both Fite-Faraco (FF) staining and fluorescent microscopy (FM), graded from zero to six plus according to Ridley's logarithmic scale. Lepra bacilli were identified in 70% of patients on FF staining, while fluorescent microscopy showed positivity in 80%. The mean BI calculated by FM (2.48) was significantly higher than that by the FF method (2.18), and more multibacillary disease was identified by fluorescent staining compared to FF staining.

Conclusion: It is advantageous to use fluorescent microscopy as an adjunct to conventional Fite-Faraco stain especially in cases where the latter fails to detect lepra bacilli and in a clinically suspected multibacillary disease.

荧光显微镜:一个有用的辅助工具在麻风病诊断:横断面研究。
背景与目的:麻风是一种由麻风分枝杆菌引起的慢性传染病。Fite-Faraco (FF)是用于证明麻风分枝杆菌在组织切片中存在的常规染色方法。荧光显微镜(FM)可以帮助更好地观察麻风杆菌。本研究比较了荧光显微镜和Fite-Faraco两种方法在组织切片中检测麻风分枝杆菌。方法:采用FF染色法对60例汉森氏病皮肤活检组织病理学进行观察。比较了Auramine- Rhodamine荧光染色法与常规FF染色法鉴定Lepra杆菌的性能。结果:本双镜研究共纳入60例临床和组织病理学证实的汉森病病例。病例被细分为不同的组织学类型。在LED照明的荧光显微镜下进行Auramine-rhodamine荧光染色和检查。在油浸场下计算Fite-Faraco (FF)染色和荧光显微镜(FM)的细菌学指数(BI),根据Ridley对数标度从0到6 +分级。FF染色70%的患者检出Lepra杆菌,荧光显微镜下80%的患者检出Lepra杆菌。FM法计算的平均BI(2.48)显著高于FF法(2.18),荧光染色比FF法鉴定出更多的多菌性疾病。结论:荧光显微镜作为常规Fite-Faraco染色的辅助检查,在常规Fite-Faraco染色不能检出麻风杆菌和临床怀疑为多菌性疾病的病例中具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Pathology
Iranian Journal of Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信