The Impact of Plasmakinetic Resection and Conventional Transurethral Resection of the Prostate on Clinical Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Caoke Gong, Songnian Zou, Shouxi Cui
{"title":"The Impact of Plasmakinetic Resection and Conventional Transurethral Resection of the Prostate on Clinical Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Caoke Gong, Songnian Zou, Shouxi Cui","doi":"10.22037/uj.v22i.8330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a condition commonly observed in elderly males, leading to lower urinary tract symptoms and potential complications. Surgical procedures primarily include transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and plasmakinetic resection, with their effectiveness under active research and clinical interest.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study compared the impacts of plasmakinetic resection and conventional TURP on clinical symptoms and quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. It encompassed surgical duration, postoperative complications, urodynamic parameters, quality of life scores, sexual function, and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative symptom improvements, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life (QoL) score, were significantly higher in the plasmakinetic resection group (P = 0.033 and P = 0.003, respectively). Urodynamic parameters such as peak flow rate (P = 0.008), post-void residual volume (P = 0.044), and Qmax (P = 0.012) also showed significant improvements. Quality of life assessments, including (EuroQol-5 Dimensions)EQ-5D scores (P = 0.003), general health perception (P = 0.009), sexual function (P = 0.011), and overall satisfaction (P = 0.004) favored plasmakinetic resection. Plasmakinetic resection resulted in better outcomes for continence and sexual function. Long-term outcomes at 1 year post-operation, including IPSS scores (P = 0.006) and overall satisfaction (P = 0.002), were significantly better in the plasmakinetic resection group. No significant differences were observed in health care resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that plasmakinetic resection offers advantages over conventional TURP in symptom relief, quality of life, continence, sexual function, and long-term results for patients with BPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":"22 2","pages":"106-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a condition commonly observed in elderly males, leading to lower urinary tract symptoms and potential complications. Surgical procedures primarily include transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and plasmakinetic resection, with their effectiveness under active research and clinical interest.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study compared the impacts of plasmakinetic resection and conventional TURP on clinical symptoms and quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. It encompassed surgical duration, postoperative complications, urodynamic parameters, quality of life scores, sexual function, and long-term outcomes.

Results: Postoperative symptom improvements, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life (QoL) score, were significantly higher in the plasmakinetic resection group (P = 0.033 and P = 0.003, respectively). Urodynamic parameters such as peak flow rate (P = 0.008), post-void residual volume (P = 0.044), and Qmax (P = 0.012) also showed significant improvements. Quality of life assessments, including (EuroQol-5 Dimensions)EQ-5D scores (P = 0.003), general health perception (P = 0.009), sexual function (P = 0.011), and overall satisfaction (P = 0.004) favored plasmakinetic resection. Plasmakinetic resection resulted in better outcomes for continence and sexual function. Long-term outcomes at 1 year post-operation, including IPSS scores (P = 0.006) and overall satisfaction (P = 0.002), were significantly better in the plasmakinetic resection group. No significant differences were observed in health care resource utilization.

Conclusion: The study suggests that plasmakinetic resection offers advantages over conventional TURP in symptom relief, quality of life, continence, sexual function, and long-term results for patients with BPH.

血浆动力切除与传统经尿道前列腺切除术对良性前列腺增生患者临床症状和生活质量的影响:回顾性队列研究
目的:良性前列腺增生(BPH)是一种常见于老年男性的疾病,可导致下尿路症状和潜在并发症。外科手术主要包括经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)和等离子切除,其有效性正在积极研究和临床关注。材料与方法:本回顾性队列研究比较等离子切除与常规TURP对良性前列腺增生患者临床症状和生活质量的影响。它包括手术时间、术后并发症、尿动力学参数、生活质量评分、性功能和长期结果。结果:血浆动力切除组患者术后症状改善,包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和生活质量评分(QoL)均显著高于对照组(P = 0.033和P = 0.003)。尿动力学参数如峰值流量(P = 0.008)、空后残余容积(P = 0.044)和Qmax (P = 0.012)也有显著改善。生活质量评估,包括(EuroQol-5维度)EQ-5D评分(P = 0.003)、总体健康感知(P = 0.009)、性功能(P = 0.011)和总体满意度(P = 0.004)倾向于等离子切除。等离子切除对尿失禁和性功能有较好的疗效。术后1年的长期预后,包括IPSS评分(P = 0.006)和总体满意度(P = 0.002),血浆动力切除组明显更好。两组在卫生资源利用方面无显著差异。结论:研究表明等离子切除在缓解BPH患者的症状、生活质量、尿失禁、性功能和长期疗效方面优于传统的TURP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信