Laparoscopic Management of the Urinary Stones.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hamid Pakmanesh
{"title":"Laparoscopic Management of the Urinary Stones.","authors":"Hamid Pakmanesh","doi":"10.22037/uj.v22i.8456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic stone surgery was historically recommended only for cases involving concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), congenital abnormalities, or when other endourological procedures had failed as an alternative to open surgery. However, recent randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses involving patients with normal anatomy and large renal stones have shown that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) has a higher success rate and lower complication rates compared to the gold standard, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Furthermore, stone recurrence appears to be lower following LPL compared to PCNL. Therefore, we suggest that current guidelines for stone treatment reconsider laparoscopy as an effective primary treatment for large kidney stones, rather than simply viewing it as an alternative option. Nonetheless, careful case selection and the surgeon's experience are critical for the success of this treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":"22 2","pages":"58-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laparoscopic stone surgery was historically recommended only for cases involving concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), congenital abnormalities, or when other endourological procedures had failed as an alternative to open surgery. However, recent randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses involving patients with normal anatomy and large renal stones have shown that laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) has a higher success rate and lower complication rates compared to the gold standard, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Furthermore, stone recurrence appears to be lower following LPL compared to PCNL. Therefore, we suggest that current guidelines for stone treatment reconsider laparoscopy as an effective primary treatment for large kidney stones, rather than simply viewing it as an alternative option. Nonetheless, careful case selection and the surgeon's experience are critical for the success of this treatment.

尿路结石的腹腔镜治疗。
历史上,腹腔镜结石手术仅推荐用于伴有肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻(UPJO)、先天性异常或其他泌尿道手术失败的病例,作为开放手术的替代方案。然而,最近涉及正常解剖和大肾结石患者的随机临床试验和荟萃分析表明,与金标准经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)相比,腹腔镜肾盂取石术(LPL)成功率更高,并发症发生率更低。此外,与PCNL相比,LPL术后结石复发率似乎更低。因此,我们建议目前的结石治疗指南重新考虑腹腔镜作为大肾结石的有效主要治疗方法,而不是简单地将其视为一种替代选择。然而,谨慎的病例选择和外科医生的经验对这种治疗的成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信