Efficacy-cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy: A propensity score matching analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shi-Yi Zhang, Ying-Chun Wang, Lei-Lei Liu, Zhi-Heng Wang, Xue-Mei Guan
{"title":"Efficacy-cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy: A propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Shi-Yi Zhang, Ying-Chun Wang, Lei-Lei Liu, Zhi-Heng Wang, Xue-Mei Guan","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.99510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events, few studies have examined the cost differences between CSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for the treatment of intestinal polyps.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy-cost of EMR and CSP in the treatment of intestinal polyps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients with intestinal polyps were included in the retrospective data of our hospital from April 2022 to May 2023. According to the treatment methods, they were divided into EMR (<i>n</i> = 46) group and CSP (<i>n</i> = 54) group. The baseline data of the two groups were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), and the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the two groups after matching. The recurrence rate of the two groups of patients was followed up for 1 year, and they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to whether they recurred. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the influencing factors affecting the recurrence of intestinal polyps after endoscopic resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant disparities were observed in the number of polyps and smoking background between the two groups before PSM (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Following PSM, the number of polyps and smoking history were well balanced between the EMR and CSP groups. The direct cost incurred by the CSP group was markedly higher than that incurred by the EMR group. Concurrently, the cost-effectiveness ratio in the CSP group was substantially reduced when juxtaposed with that in the EMR group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Upon completion of the 1-year follow-up, the rate of recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy was 38.00%. Multivariate methods revealed that age ≥ 60 years, male sex, number of polyps ≥ 3, and pathological type of adenoma were risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy (all <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSP was more cost-effective for the treatment of intestinal polyps. An age ≥ 60 years, male sex, having a number of polyps ≥ 3, and pathological type of adenoma are independent influencing factors for recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 2","pages":"99510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.99510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although substantial evidence supports the advantages of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in terms of polypectomy efficacy and reduced postoperative adverse events, few studies have examined the cost differences between CSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for the treatment of intestinal polyps.

Aim: To compare the efficacy-cost of EMR and CSP in the treatment of intestinal polyps.

Methods: A total of 100 patients with intestinal polyps were included in the retrospective data of our hospital from April 2022 to May 2023. According to the treatment methods, they were divided into EMR (n = 46) group and CSP (n = 54) group. The baseline data of the two groups were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), and the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the two groups after matching. The recurrence rate of the two groups of patients was followed up for 1 year, and they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to whether they recurred. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the influencing factors affecting the recurrence of intestinal polyps after endoscopic resection.

Results: Significant disparities were observed in the number of polyps and smoking background between the two groups before PSM (P < 0.05). Following PSM, the number of polyps and smoking history were well balanced between the EMR and CSP groups. The direct cost incurred by the CSP group was markedly higher than that incurred by the EMR group. Concurrently, the cost-effectiveness ratio in the CSP group was substantially reduced when juxtaposed with that in the EMR group (P < 0.05). Upon completion of the 1-year follow-up, the rate of recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy was 38.00%. Multivariate methods revealed that age ≥ 60 years, male sex, number of polyps ≥ 3, and pathological type of adenoma were risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic intestinal polypectomy (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: CSP was more cost-effective for the treatment of intestinal polyps. An age ≥ 60 years, male sex, having a number of polyps ≥ 3, and pathological type of adenoma are independent influencing factors for recurrence.

内镜下粘膜切除术和冷圈套息肉切除术的疗效-成本分析:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:尽管大量证据支持冷陷阱息肉切除术(CSP)在息肉切除术疗效和减少术后不良事件方面的优势,但很少有研究调查CSP与传统内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)治疗肠息肉的成本差异。目的:比较EMR和CSP治疗肠息肉的疗效和成本。方法:回顾性分析我院2022年4月至2023年5月收治的100例肠息肉患者。根据治疗方法分为EMR组(n = 46)和CSP组(n = 54)。采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡两组基线数据,匹配后对两组进行成本-效果分析。两组患者随访1年复发率,根据是否复发分为复发组和非复发组。采用多因素logistic回归分析筛选内镜下肠息肉切除术后复发的影响因素。结果:两组患者PSM前息肉数及吸烟背景比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。PSM后,EMR组和CSP组的息肉数量和吸烟史基本平衡。CSP组的直接成本明显高于EMR组。同时,与EMR组相比,CSP组的成本-效果比明显降低(P < 0.05)。随访1年,内镜下肠息肉切除术后复发率为38.00%。多因素分析显示,年龄≥60岁、男性、息肉数≥3个、腺瘤病理类型是内镜下肠息肉切除术后复发的危险因素(均P < 0.05)。结论:CSP治疗肠息肉具有较好的治疗效果。年龄≥60岁,男性,息肉数≥3个,腺瘤病理类型是复发的独立影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信