Late Flap Failure: Etiology and Management.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Matthew B Studer, Skylar H Trott, Sara Yang, Farshid Taghizadeh, Mark K Wax
{"title":"Late Flap Failure: Etiology and Management.","authors":"Matthew B Studer, Skylar H Trott, Sara Yang, Farshid Taghizadeh, Mark K Wax","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Late free flap failure is an unusual setback for patients; we investigated the etiology and management of late flap failure.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Single-institution retrospective review of 1959 free flaps from 2010 to 2023 for head and neck defects.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary Academic Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Late failure was defined as initial detection of vascular compromise on postoperative day 6+, who went on to have total or partial flap loss. Variables included age, subsite, medical history, complications, day of detection, failure etiology, and treatment. Late failure cohort was compared to a cohort of 499 patients with long-term flap survival and 37 patients with early flap failure. Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval obtained; study number IRB00003898.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients had late failure (1.6%). Twenty-five (80.6%) had total flap failure; six (19.4%) had partial failure. The majority (17, 54.8%) were associated with a postoperative complication (infection, fistula, wound dehiscence, or hematoma) which contributed to flap compromise. Average time until detection was 11 days. Patients had two or more reoperations in 21 cases (67.7%); rotational flaps were most common (19, 61.3%) followed by a second free flap (9, 29%). In comparing the late failure and long-term flap survival cohorts, late failure patients had a higher proportion of having had at least one intraoperative pedicle revision (41.9% vs 15.4%, odds ratio [OR] = 3.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.86-8.41]); early flap failure patients had similar pedicle revision rates to late failure patients. Late failure patients had more postoperative infections than early failure patients (41.9% vs 18.9%, OR = 3.10 [95% CI 1.04-9.20]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with late free flap failure require multiple operations for debridement and secondary reconstruction. Patients with both late and early failure are more likely to have had intraoperative pedicle revision. Postoperative infection is more common in late flap failure than early flap failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Late free flap failure is an unusual setback for patients; we investigated the etiology and management of late flap failure.

Study design: Single-institution retrospective review of 1959 free flaps from 2010 to 2023 for head and neck defects.

Setting: Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Methods: Late failure was defined as initial detection of vascular compromise on postoperative day 6+, who went on to have total or partial flap loss. Variables included age, subsite, medical history, complications, day of detection, failure etiology, and treatment. Late failure cohort was compared to a cohort of 499 patients with long-term flap survival and 37 patients with early flap failure. Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval obtained; study number IRB00003898.

Results: Thirty-one patients had late failure (1.6%). Twenty-five (80.6%) had total flap failure; six (19.4%) had partial failure. The majority (17, 54.8%) were associated with a postoperative complication (infection, fistula, wound dehiscence, or hematoma) which contributed to flap compromise. Average time until detection was 11 days. Patients had two or more reoperations in 21 cases (67.7%); rotational flaps were most common (19, 61.3%) followed by a second free flap (9, 29%). In comparing the late failure and long-term flap survival cohorts, late failure patients had a higher proportion of having had at least one intraoperative pedicle revision (41.9% vs 15.4%, odds ratio [OR] = 3.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.86-8.41]); early flap failure patients had similar pedicle revision rates to late failure patients. Late failure patients had more postoperative infections than early failure patients (41.9% vs 18.9%, OR = 3.10 [95% CI 1.04-9.20]).

Conclusion: Patients with late free flap failure require multiple operations for debridement and secondary reconstruction. Patients with both late and early failure are more likely to have had intraoperative pedicle revision. Postoperative infection is more common in late flap failure than early flap failure.

晚期皮瓣失败:病因和处理。
目的:晚期游离皮瓣失败是一种罕见的挫折;我们探讨了晚期皮瓣失效的病因和处理方法。研究设计:对2010年至2023年间用于头颈部缺损的1959例游离皮瓣进行单机构回顾性分析。单位:三级学术医疗中心。方法:晚期失败被定义为在术后6天以上首次发现血管受损,并继续发生全部或部分皮瓣丢失。变量包括年龄、亚部位、病史、并发症、发现日、失败病因和治疗。将晚期衰竭队列与499例皮瓣长期存活患者和37例早期皮瓣衰竭患者的队列进行比较。获得俄勒冈健康与科学大学机构审查委员会(IRB)的批准;研究编号IRB00003898。结果:晚期失败31例(1.6%)。皮瓣全损25例(80.6%);6例(19.4%)部分失效。大多数(17.54.8%)与术后并发症(感染、瘘、伤口裂开或血肿)相关,这些并发症导致皮瓣受损。平均检测时间为11天。2次及2次以上再手术21例(67.7%);旋转皮瓣最常见(19.61.3%),其次是第二次自由皮瓣(9.29%)。在比较晚期衰竭组和长期皮瓣存活组时,晚期衰竭患者至少进行过一次术中蒂翻修的比例更高(41.9% vs 15.4%,优势比[OR] = 3.96[95%可信区间(CI) 1.86-8.41]);早期皮瓣失败患者的蒂修复率与晚期失败患者相似。晚期衰竭患者术后感染发生率高于早期衰竭患者(41.9% vs 18.9%, OR = 3.10 [95% CI 1.04-9.20])。结论:晚期游离皮瓣失效患者需要多次手术清创和二次重建。晚期和早期失败的患者更有可能进行术中椎弓根翻修。术后感染在晚期皮瓣失效中比在早期皮瓣失效中更常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信