Comparison of outcomes for Draf IIB vs Draf III in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.8 2区医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.507

Y Hirayama, M S Shahid, H A Finney, J Muzaffar, M S Haque, R Accorona, H Iftikhar

{"title":"Comparison of outcomes for Draf IIB vs Draf III in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Y Hirayama, M S Shahid, H A Finney, J Muzaffar, M S Haque, R Accorona, H Iftikhar","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Understanding the factors associated with increased rates of restenosis following Draf procedures is crucial for developing targeted strategies to mitigate complications such as mucocele formation, reduce the need for revision surgeries, and improve long-term patient outcomes.Methodology: A systematic search was conducted using Embase, Medline, CINAHL, AMED, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database on January 17th, 2024. Research articles published in English language were included. Abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers, and data were extracted and assessed for quality in adherence to PRISMA guidelines. Meta- and sub-group analyses were conducted using the REML model and random-effects model to address high heterogeneity and I² values.Results: A total of 96 studies met the inclusion criteria. For the Draf IIB subgroup (15 studies, 239 sinuses), the restenosis rate was 7%, compared to 20% in the Draf III subgroup (40 studies, 1,910 sinuses). Revision surgery rates were 5% for Draf IIB versus 12% for Draf III. Adjuvant interventions, such as steroid-impregnated stents, were associated with improved outcomes, showing an ostium patency OR of 2.20.Conclusion: Draf IIB had superior outcomes compared to Draf III with respect to restenosis and revision surgery. The use of steroid-impregnated stents appears effective in reducing restenosis rates.","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the factors associated with increased rates of restenosis following Draf procedures is crucial for developing targeted strategies to mitigate complications such as mucocele formation, reduce the need for revision surgeries, and improve long-term patient outcomes.

Methodology: A systematic search was conducted using Embase, Medline, CINAHL, AMED, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database on January 17th, 2024. Research articles published in English language were included. Abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers, and data were extracted and assessed for quality in adherence to PRISMA guidelines. Meta- and sub-group analyses were conducted using the REML model and random-effects model to address high heterogeneity and I² values.

Results: A total of 96 studies met the inclusion criteria. For the Draf IIB subgroup (15 studies, 239 sinuses), the restenosis rate was 7%, compared to 20% in the Draf III subgroup (40 studies, 1,910 sinuses). Revision surgery rates were 5% for Draf IIB versus 12% for Draf III. Adjuvant interventions, such as steroid-impregnated stents, were associated with improved outcomes, showing an ostium patency OR of 2.20.

Conclusion: Draf IIB had superior outcomes compared to Draf III with respect to restenosis and revision surgery. The use of steroid-impregnated stents appears effective in reducing restenosis rates.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学

CiteScore

15.80

自引率

9.70%

发文量

135

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.