Do Alveolar Bone Dehiscences and Fenestrations Remodel After Adult Non-Extraction Clear Aligner Therapy? A Retrospective Study up to 2 Years in Retention.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sanjana Santhosh Kumar, Erika Correa, Paul Emile Rossouw, Abdul Basir Barmak, Tarek El-Bialy, Elli Anna Kotsailidi, Dimitrios Michelogiannakis
{"title":"Do Alveolar Bone Dehiscences and Fenestrations Remodel After Adult Non-Extraction Clear Aligner Therapy? A Retrospective Study up to 2 Years in Retention.","authors":"Sanjana Santhosh Kumar, Erika Correa, Paul Emile Rossouw, Abdul Basir Barmak, Tarek El-Bialy, Elli Anna Kotsailidi, Dimitrios Michelogiannakis","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the radiographic presence and magnitude of alveolar bone dehiscences (ABDs) and fenestrations (ABFs) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth of adults with dental Class II malocclusion, before (T1), immediately after (T2), and up to 2 years after (T3) non-extraction clear aligner therapy (CAT).</p><p><strong>Setting and sample population: </strong>Records from 14 adults with dental Class II malocclusion treated with non-extraction CAT and Class II elastics were retrospectively obtained.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 332 labial and lingual anterior root surfaces were assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at T1, T2 and T3. Dehiscences were recorded when the linear measurement for dehiscence (LM-D) was more than 2 mm from the cementoenamel junction. The defect was classified as ABF when it did not involve the alveolar crest and the linear measurement for fenestration (LM-F) measured more than 2.2 mm. Changes in incisor inclination and intercanine width were calculated. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between CAT and the presence of ABDs/ABFs. Linear regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting the magnitude of LM-Ds/LM-Fs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-extraction CAT was associated with an increased presence of ABDs at T2 compared to T1 [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.69; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.92-3.76]. The association remained significant at T3 (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.76-3.45). Non-extraction CAT was not significantly associated with the presence of ABFs at T2 and T3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alveolar bone remodelling during retention did not result in the reduction or resolution of post-treatment radiographic alveolar bone defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the radiographic presence and magnitude of alveolar bone dehiscences (ABDs) and fenestrations (ABFs) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth of adults with dental Class II malocclusion, before (T1), immediately after (T2), and up to 2 years after (T3) non-extraction clear aligner therapy (CAT).

Setting and sample population: Records from 14 adults with dental Class II malocclusion treated with non-extraction CAT and Class II elastics were retrospectively obtained.

Materials and methods: A total of 332 labial and lingual anterior root surfaces were assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at T1, T2 and T3. Dehiscences were recorded when the linear measurement for dehiscence (LM-D) was more than 2 mm from the cementoenamel junction. The defect was classified as ABF when it did not involve the alveolar crest and the linear measurement for fenestration (LM-F) measured more than 2.2 mm. Changes in incisor inclination and intercanine width were calculated. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between CAT and the presence of ABDs/ABFs. Linear regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting the magnitude of LM-Ds/LM-Fs.

Results: Non-extraction CAT was associated with an increased presence of ABDs at T2 compared to T1 [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.69; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.92-3.76]. The association remained significant at T3 (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.76-3.45). Non-extraction CAT was not significantly associated with the presence of ABFs at T2 and T3.

Conclusions: Alveolar bone remodelling during retention did not result in the reduction or resolution of post-treatment radiographic alveolar bone defects.

成人非拔牙清除矫正器治疗后牙槽骨裂和开孔会重塑吗?一项长达2年的回顾性研究。
目的:评价ⅱ类牙错成人上颌和下颌前牙牙槽骨裂(ABDs)和开孔(ABFs)在非拔牙清除矫正器治疗(CAT)前(T1)、治疗后(T2)和治疗后2年(T3)的x线表现和大小。背景和样本人群:回顾性获得14例成人II类错牙合用非拔牙CAT和II类弹性治疗的记录。材料和方法:在T1、T2和T3使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对332个唇和舌前根面进行评估。当裂缝线性测量(LM-D)距离牙骨质连接处超过2mm时,记录裂缝。当不累及牙槽嵴且开窗线性测量(LM-F)大于2.2 mm时,该缺陷被分类为ABF。计算切牙倾斜度和齿间宽度的变化。采用二元逻辑回归分析来评估CAT与abd / abf存在之间的关系。采用线性回归分析确定影响LM-Ds/LM-Fs大小的因素。结果:与T1相比,非提取CAT与T2时ABDs的存在增加有关[比值比(OR): 2.69;95%置信区间(CI): 1.92-3.76]。在T3时,相关性仍然显著(OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.76-3.45)。非提取CAT与T2和T3时abf的存在无显著相关性。结论:保留期间的牙槽骨重塑并没有导致治疗后影像学检查牙槽骨缺损的减少或解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信