A Systematic Review of the Incidence of Cochlear Nerve Deficiency in Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christina Zhu, Jasmine Gulati, Daniel Swanson, Anuja Shah, Paul Chisolm, Michael Hoa
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Incidence of Cochlear Nerve Deficiency in Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness.","authors":"Christina Zhu, Jasmine Gulati, Daniel Swanson, Anuja Shah, Paul Chisolm, Michael Hoa","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the variability in cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) incidence in pediatric single-sided deafness (SSD), assess how study parameters and inclusion criteria affect these rates, and examine the diagnostic tools utilized, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), in identifying CND.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines with predefined search criteria using terms related to pediatric unilateral hearing loss and CND from 2010 to January 2024. Studies were selected based on their focus on CND incidence in pediatric SSD, excluding case reports, nonhuman or adult studies, and analyses limited to bilateral deafness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 518 articles screened, 17 underwent full-text review, and 10 were included. Incidence rates of CND ranged from 15.7% to 100%, with all studies using MRI and 60% using CT as an adjunct diagnostic tool. Age criteria varied: five studies included patients 18 years and older, one study included patients up to age 21 years, and four studies targeted children under 5 years, including two studies on neonates. Variability stemmed from differing inclusion criteria; studies on younger cohorts generally excluded noncongenital causes, while older children's studies were less restrictive. Additionally, two studies excluded syndromic SSD, impacting incidence rates. Larger studies show an overall incidence of 35% to 45%, which this systematic review of the literature reports as the approximate incidence of CND in SSD, with higher incidence rates observed in studies excluding syndromic causes and broader criteria linked to decreased incidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review highlights how age-specific inclusion criteria and management of syndromic causes significantly influence reported CND incidence rates in pediatric SSD, underscoring the need for standardized reporting to improve clinical understanding and treatment approaches.Level of Evidence: 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the variability in cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) incidence in pediatric single-sided deafness (SSD), assess how study parameters and inclusion criteria affect these rates, and examine the diagnostic tools utilized, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), in identifying CND.

Data sources: Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science.

Review methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines with predefined search criteria using terms related to pediatric unilateral hearing loss and CND from 2010 to January 2024. Studies were selected based on their focus on CND incidence in pediatric SSD, excluding case reports, nonhuman or adult studies, and analyses limited to bilateral deafness.

Results: Out of 518 articles screened, 17 underwent full-text review, and 10 were included. Incidence rates of CND ranged from 15.7% to 100%, with all studies using MRI and 60% using CT as an adjunct diagnostic tool. Age criteria varied: five studies included patients 18 years and older, one study included patients up to age 21 years, and four studies targeted children under 5 years, including two studies on neonates. Variability stemmed from differing inclusion criteria; studies on younger cohorts generally excluded noncongenital causes, while older children's studies were less restrictive. Additionally, two studies excluded syndromic SSD, impacting incidence rates. Larger studies show an overall incidence of 35% to 45%, which this systematic review of the literature reports as the approximate incidence of CND in SSD, with higher incidence rates observed in studies excluding syndromic causes and broader criteria linked to decreased incidence.

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights how age-specific inclusion criteria and management of syndromic causes significantly influence reported CND incidence rates in pediatric SSD, underscoring the need for standardized reporting to improve clinical understanding and treatment approaches.Level of Evidence: 1.

小儿单侧耳聋中耳蜗神经缺损发生率的系统综述。
目的:评估儿童单侧耳聋(SSD)中耳蜗神经缺损(CND)发生率的变异性,评估研究参数和纳入标准如何影响这些发生率,并检查用于识别CND的诊断工具,包括磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)。数据来源:数据库包括MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL和Web of Science。综述方法:根据2010年至2024年1月期间儿童单侧听力损失和CND相关术语的系统综述和meta分析报告指南的首选报告项目进行了系统综述。研究的选择基于对儿童SSD中CND发病率的关注,不包括病例报告、非人类或成人研究以及仅限于双侧耳聋的分析。结果:在518篇被筛选的文章中,17篇进行了全文审查,其中10篇被纳入。CND的发病率从15.7%到100%不等,所有研究都使用MRI, 60%使用CT作为辅助诊断工具。年龄标准各不相同:5项研究纳入18岁及以上患者,1项研究纳入21岁以下患者,4项研究针对5岁以下儿童,包括2项针对新生儿的研究。差异源于不同的纳入标准;年龄较小的研究通常排除非先天性原因,而年龄较大的研究限制较少。此外,两项研究排除了影响发病率的综合征性SSD。较大的研究显示,总体发病率为35%至45%,本文献系统综述报道,这是SSD中CND的大致发病率,在排除综合征原因的研究中观察到更高的发病率,并将更广泛的标准与发病率降低联系起来。结论:本系统综述强调了特定年龄的纳入标准和综合征原因的处理如何显著影响儿童SSD报告的CND发病率,强调了标准化报告的必要性,以提高临床认识和治疗方法。证据等级:1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信