Samuel P O'Rourke, Margaret E Richter, Lisa R Park, Emily Buss, Kevin D Brown, Margaret T Dillon
{"title":"Speech Recognition for Pediatric Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users with Unilateral Hearing Loss.","authors":"Samuel P O'Rourke, Margaret E Richter, Lisa R Park, Emily Buss, Kevin D Brown, Margaret T Dillon","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and functional low-frequency acoustic hearing in the implanted ear could be fit with an electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device, which is the combination of acoustic and CI technologies in one device. Outcomes for this unique patient population are currently unknown. The present study assessed the speech recognition of pediatric EAS users with UHL.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Pediatric CI recipients with functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear (i.e., ≤ 80 dB HL) and a contralateral pure-tone average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) ≤ 25 dB HL.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Speech recognition was assessed with the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) test for the affected ear preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Masked speech recognition was assessed with the Bamford-Kowal-Bench speech-in-noise test in the bilateral condition for three spatial configurations: target from the front and masker colocated with the target or presented 90° toward the implanted or contralateral ear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children experienced a significant improvement in CNC scores with EAS as compared to preoperative abilities with a hearing aid (F(2,7) = 10.0, p = 0.009). Preliminary masked sentence recognition data suggest a benefit in performance when the target was spatially separated from the masker, and a benefit with EAS as compared to an unaided listening condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with UHL and functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear experience better speech recognition with EAS as compared to preoperative abilities or listening unaided.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004460","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and functional low-frequency acoustic hearing in the implanted ear could be fit with an electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device, which is the combination of acoustic and CI technologies in one device. Outcomes for this unique patient population are currently unknown. The present study assessed the speech recognition of pediatric EAS users with UHL.
Study design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Tertiary academic referral center.
Patients: Pediatric CI recipients with functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear (i.e., ≤ 80 dB HL) and a contralateral pure-tone average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) ≤ 25 dB HL.
Main outcome measures: Speech recognition was assessed with the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) test for the affected ear preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Masked speech recognition was assessed with the Bamford-Kowal-Bench speech-in-noise test in the bilateral condition for three spatial configurations: target from the front and masker colocated with the target or presented 90° toward the implanted or contralateral ear.
Results: Children experienced a significant improvement in CNC scores with EAS as compared to preoperative abilities with a hearing aid (F(2,7) = 10.0, p = 0.009). Preliminary masked sentence recognition data suggest a benefit in performance when the target was spatially separated from the masker, and a benefit with EAS as compared to an unaided listening condition.
Conclusions: Children with UHL and functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear experience better speech recognition with EAS as compared to preoperative abilities or listening unaided.
目的:儿童人工耳蜗(CI)受者单侧听力损失(UHL)和植入耳内功能性低频声学听力可以采用电声刺激(EAS)装置,该装置是声学和CI技术的结合。这一独特患者群体的预后目前尚不清楚。本研究评估患有UHL的儿童EAS用户的语音识别能力。研究设计:回顾性研究。单位:三级学术转诊中心。患者:儿童CI受者,植入耳中有功能性声学听力(即≤80 dB HL),对侧纯音平均(0.5、1、2和4 kHz)≤25 dB HL。主要观察指标:术前和激活后6个月和12个月,用辅音-核-辅音(CNC)测试对患耳进行语音识别评估。采用Bamford-Kowal-Bench噪声中语音测试,在双侧条件下对三种空间配置:目标在前方,掩蔽物与目标在同一位置,或向植入耳或对侧耳呈90°。结果:与术前使用助听器相比,使用EAS的儿童的CNC评分有显著改善(F(2,7) = 10.0, p = 0.009)。初步的掩蔽句子识别数据表明,当目标在空间上与掩蔽者分开时,性能会有所提高,并且与无辅助听力条件相比,EAS的效果更好。结论:与术前或单独听力相比,植入耳的UHL和功能性声学听力患儿使用EAS可获得更好的语音识别能力。
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.