Non-Funduscopic Slit Lamp Assessment of the Posterior Hyaloid Membrane - A Simpler and More Effective Way of Clinically Diagnosing Posterior Vitreous Detachments.
Shefali Sood, Talha A Barra, Ryan T Duong, Imran A Khatri, Mohammed K Barazi, Michael H Osman, Abdullah Abou-Samra, Jeanette Du, Hamza A Lateef, J Mingyi Huang, Claudia G Hooten, Brian K Do, Joshua D Levinson, Alexander Melamud, Mariam Mathai, Mohsin H Ali
{"title":"Non-Funduscopic Slit Lamp Assessment of the Posterior Hyaloid Membrane - A Simpler and More Effective Way of Clinically Diagnosing Posterior Vitreous Detachments.","authors":"Shefali Sood, Talha A Barra, Ryan T Duong, Imran A Khatri, Mohammed K Barazi, Michael H Osman, Abdullah Abou-Samra, Jeanette Du, Hamza A Lateef, J Mingyi Huang, Claudia G Hooten, Brian K Do, Joshua D Levinson, Alexander Melamud, Mariam Mathai, Mohsin H Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2025.02.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the clinical utility of a simpler method of detecting a complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) - visualization of the posterior hyaloid membrane at the slit lamp - which does not require expert dilated fundus examination skills, special instrumentation (fundoscopy lenses), or imaging devices (OCT or B-scan).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional case series PARTICIPANTS: All eligible patients presenting to the retina clinic during the study period were consecutively examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients were examined for the presence or absence of a PVD using the posterior hyaloid membrane assessment method, Weiss ring assessment method, and via optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed by three masked graders.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operator curves (ROC) and areas under the curve (AUC) were analyzed to assess the clinical utility of the two methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 206 eyes of 118 patients were included. The incidence of true posterior vitreous detachments based on OCT was 57.3%. The posterior hyaloid assessment method was more sensitive than the Weiss ring assessment method (89.8% vs 79.7%, p-value: 0.04), and had a higher NPV (87.5% vs 78.2%, p-value: <0.01). There was no significant difference in specificity between the posterior hyaloid membrane and Weiss ring methods (95.5% vs 97.4%, p-value: 0.5) or PPV (96.4% vs 97.3%, p-value: 0.2). The AUC for the posterior hyaloid assessment and Weiss Ring methods were 0.93 and 0.89, respectively (chi-squared=2.84, p-value: 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that this method of assessing the posterior hyaloid status is clinically meaningful and has a high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve. Compared to the Weiss ring method, the posterior hyaloid membrane assessment has a significantly higher sensitivity and negative predictive value and a similarly high specificity, positive predictive value, and area under the curve. Although trainees are not regularly taught this diagnostic skill, these results support that visualizing and assessing the posterior hyaloid membrane should be in every ophthalmologist's diagnostic skill repertoire.</p>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2025.02.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the clinical utility of a simpler method of detecting a complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) - visualization of the posterior hyaloid membrane at the slit lamp - which does not require expert dilated fundus examination skills, special instrumentation (fundoscopy lenses), or imaging devices (OCT or B-scan).
Design: Cross-sectional case series PARTICIPANTS: All eligible patients presenting to the retina clinic during the study period were consecutively examined.
Methods: All patients were examined for the presence or absence of a PVD using the posterior hyaloid membrane assessment method, Weiss ring assessment method, and via optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed by three masked graders.
Main outcome measures: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operator curves (ROC) and areas under the curve (AUC) were analyzed to assess the clinical utility of the two methods.
Results: A total of 206 eyes of 118 patients were included. The incidence of true posterior vitreous detachments based on OCT was 57.3%. The posterior hyaloid assessment method was more sensitive than the Weiss ring assessment method (89.8% vs 79.7%, p-value: 0.04), and had a higher NPV (87.5% vs 78.2%, p-value: <0.01). There was no significant difference in specificity between the posterior hyaloid membrane and Weiss ring methods (95.5% vs 97.4%, p-value: 0.5) or PPV (96.4% vs 97.3%, p-value: 0.2). The AUC for the posterior hyaloid assessment and Weiss Ring methods were 0.93 and 0.89, respectively (chi-squared=2.84, p-value: 0.09).
Conclusions: This study shows that this method of assessing the posterior hyaloid status is clinically meaningful and has a high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve. Compared to the Weiss ring method, the posterior hyaloid membrane assessment has a significantly higher sensitivity and negative predictive value and a similarly high specificity, positive predictive value, and area under the curve. Although trainees are not regularly taught this diagnostic skill, these results support that visualizing and assessing the posterior hyaloid membrane should be in every ophthalmologist's diagnostic skill repertoire.
目的:评估一种更简单的检测完全后玻璃体脱离(PVD)的方法的临床应用-在裂隙灯下显示后玻璃体膜-不需要专业的眼底扩张检查技巧,特殊仪器(眼底镜镜片)或成像设备(OCT或b扫描)。设计:横断面病例系列参与者:所有在研究期间到视网膜诊所就诊的符合条件的患者均被连续检查。方法:所有患者均采用后透明膜评估法、韦斯环评估法和由三名掩膜评分者进行的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检查PVD的存在或不存在。主要观察指标:分析两种方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、受试者操作曲线(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC),评价两种方法的临床应用价值。结果:共纳入118例患者206只眼。基于OCT的真实玻璃体后脱离的发生率为57.3%。后透明体评估法比Weiss环评估法更敏感(89.8% vs 79.7%, p值:0.04),NPV更高(87.5% vs 78.2%, p值)。结论:本研究表明该方法评估后透明体状态具有较高的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和曲线下面积,具有临床意义。与Weiss环法相比,后透明膜评估具有更高的敏感性和阴性预测值,并且具有同样高的特异性、阳性预测值和曲线下面积。虽然受训者没有被定期教授这种诊断技能,但这些结果支持可视化和评估后玻璃状膜应该是每个眼科医生的诊断技能之一。