Effect of Esketamine on Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder at Imminent Suicide Risk: A Randomized Psychoactive-Controlled Study.

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Colette Kosik-Gonzalez, Dong-Jing Fu, Li Nancy Chen, Rosanne Lane, Michael H Bloch, Melissa DelBello, Carmen Moreno, Wayne C Drevets, Carla M Canuso
{"title":"Effect of Esketamine on Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder at Imminent Suicide Risk: A Randomized Psychoactive-Controlled Study.","authors":"Colette Kosik-Gonzalez, Dong-Jing Fu, Li Nancy Chen, Rosanne Lane, Michael H Bloch, Melissa DelBello, Carmen Moreno, Wayne C Drevets, Carla M Canuso","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of esketamine nasal spray vs psychoactive placebo (oral midazolam) in rapidly reducing depressive symptoms in adolescents with major depressive disorder at imminent risk for suicide.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This double-blind, double-dummy, phase 2b study randomized (1:1:1:2) 147 adolescents (12 to <18 years old) to esketamine (28, 56, or 84 mg) or midazolam twice weekly for 4 weeks. Participants concomitantly received comprehensive standard of care, including initial hospitalization, oral antidepressant, and evidenced-based psychotherapy. The primary efficacy end point-change in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total score from baseline to 24 hours post first dose-was analyzed using analysis of covariance, according to a pooled sequential multiple testing procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants were moderately to severely depressed at enrollment; approximately 95% were moderately to extremely suicidal. Pooled esketamine doses (56 and 84 mg) showed superiority over midazolam in reducing CDRS-R total score at 24 hours post first dose (between-group difference of least squares means [95% CI]: -5.8 [-11.19, -0.35], p = .037). The between-group differences for individual esketamine 84 mg and 56 mg doses vs midazolam were -5.7 ([-12.91, 1.55], p = .123) and -5.9 ([-12.25, 0.53], p = .072), respectively. Severity of suicidality, per Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Suicidality-revised (CGI-SS-R), improved in all 4 groups (between-group difference of least squares means [95% CI]: -0.2 [-0.90, 0.41], -0.3 [-0.93, 0.31], 0.0 [-0.69, 0.72] for esketamine 28, 56, and 84 mg, respectively, at 24 hours post first dose). Common adverse events (incidence ≥20%) reported for esketamine were dizziness, nausea, dissociation, headache, dysgeusia, somnolence, vomiting, hypoesthesia, and intentional self-injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary efficacy end point of the study was met for the pooled esketamine doses (56 and 84 mg). Esketamine in conjunction with comprehensive standard of care rapidly improved depressive symptoms among adolescents at imminent risk for suicide.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration information: </strong>Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Fixed Doses of Intranasal Esketamine in Addition to Comprehensive Standard of Care for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Pediatric Participants Assessed to Be at Imminent Risk for Suicide; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03185819.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.02.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of esketamine nasal spray vs psychoactive placebo (oral midazolam) in rapidly reducing depressive symptoms in adolescents with major depressive disorder at imminent risk for suicide.

Method: This double-blind, double-dummy, phase 2b study randomized (1:1:1:2) 147 adolescents (12 to <18 years old) to esketamine (28, 56, or 84 mg) or midazolam twice weekly for 4 weeks. Participants concomitantly received comprehensive standard of care, including initial hospitalization, oral antidepressant, and evidenced-based psychotherapy. The primary efficacy end point-change in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total score from baseline to 24 hours post first dose-was analyzed using analysis of covariance, according to a pooled sequential multiple testing procedure.

Results: All participants were moderately to severely depressed at enrollment; approximately 95% were moderately to extremely suicidal. Pooled esketamine doses (56 and 84 mg) showed superiority over midazolam in reducing CDRS-R total score at 24 hours post first dose (between-group difference of least squares means [95% CI]: -5.8 [-11.19, -0.35], p = .037). The between-group differences for individual esketamine 84 mg and 56 mg doses vs midazolam were -5.7 ([-12.91, 1.55], p = .123) and -5.9 ([-12.25, 0.53], p = .072), respectively. Severity of suicidality, per Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Suicidality-revised (CGI-SS-R), improved in all 4 groups (between-group difference of least squares means [95% CI]: -0.2 [-0.90, 0.41], -0.3 [-0.93, 0.31], 0.0 [-0.69, 0.72] for esketamine 28, 56, and 84 mg, respectively, at 24 hours post first dose). Common adverse events (incidence ≥20%) reported for esketamine were dizziness, nausea, dissociation, headache, dysgeusia, somnolence, vomiting, hypoesthesia, and intentional self-injury.

Conclusion: The primary efficacy end point of the study was met for the pooled esketamine doses (56 and 84 mg). Esketamine in conjunction with comprehensive standard of care rapidly improved depressive symptoms among adolescents at imminent risk for suicide.

Clinical trial registration information: Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Fixed Doses of Intranasal Esketamine in Addition to Comprehensive Standard of Care for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Pediatric Participants Assessed to Be at Imminent Risk for Suicide; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03185819.

艾氯胺酮对有自杀危险的重度抑郁症青少年抑郁症状的影响:一项随机精神活性对照研究
目的:评价艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂与精神活性安慰剂(口服咪达唑仑)在快速减轻有自杀危险的重度抑郁症青少年抑郁症状方面的疗效、安全性和耐受性。方法:这项双盲、双虚拟、2b期研究随机(1:1:1:2)147名青少年(12至12岁)。结果:所有参与者入组时均为中度至重度抑郁;大约95%的人有中度至重度自杀倾向。艾氯胺酮合并剂量(56和84 mg)在降低首次给药后24小时CDRS-R总评分方面优于咪达唑仑(LS均值组间差异[95% CI]: -5.8 [-11.19, -0.35];p = 0.037)。84 mg和56 mg艾氯胺酮与咪达唑仑的组间差异分别为-5.7 ([-12.91,1.55],p=0.123)和-5.9 ([-12.25,0.53],p=0.072)。根据《临床总体印象-自杀严重程度修订》,4组患者的自杀严重程度均有所改善(首次给药后24小时,es氯胺酮28、56和84 mg组的LS均值组间差异[95% CI]分别为-0.2[-0.90,0.41]、-0.3[-0.93,0.31]、0.0[-0.69,0.72])。埃氯胺酮报告的常见不良事件(发生率≥20%)为头晕、恶心、精神分离、头痛、认知障碍、嗜睡、呕吐、感觉减退和故意自伤。结论:艾氯胺酮合并剂量(56 mg和84 mg)达到了研究的主要疗效终点:艾氯胺酮联合综合SOC可迅速改善有自杀危险的青少年的抑郁症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信