Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new spectral domain optical coherence biometer and agreement with a validated biometer.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Arianna Grendele, Alice Galzignato, Kenneth J Hoffer, Catarina P Coutinho, Francesco Calossi, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Giacomo Savini
{"title":"Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new spectral domain optical coherence biometer and agreement with a validated biometer.","authors":"Arianna Grendele, Alice Galzignato, Kenneth J Hoffer, Catarina P Coutinho, Francesco Calossi, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Giacomo Savini","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the repeatability of measurements obtained with a new spectral-domain optical coherence tomography-based biometer (Colombo IOL II, Moptim) and assess their agreement with those provided by the IOLMaster 700 (Zeiss).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>I.R.C.C.S. Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent 3 consecutive scans with the Colombo IOL II and 1 with the IOLMaster 700. Two groups were analyzed: Group A included a series of consecutive patients undergoing phacoemulsification and Group B a series of subjects with a clear lens. Axial length (AL), keratometry, keratometric astigmatism, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), corneal diameter (CD), central corneal thickness (CCT) and retinal thickness (RT) were analyzed. The within-subject standard deviation (Sw), intrasession test variability, coefficient of variation (CoV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for repeatability analysis. 95% limits of agreement were calculated to assess agreement with the IOLMaster 700.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six unoperated eyes of 96 patients were enrolled (Group A: 45 Group B: 51). The CoV was low for most parameters, as it ranged between 0.04% (AL) to 4.47% (RT) in Group A and from 0.03% (AL) to 2.23% (LT) in Group B. Keratometric astigmatism measurements were less repeatable. Good agreement with the IOLMaster 700 was found for K, LT and AL, whereas the mean ACD was higher by 0.07±0.11 mm with the Colombo IOL II (p <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurements by the Colombo IOL II showed high repeatability and good agreement with those provided by the IOLMaster 700.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of measurements obtained with a new spectral-domain optical coherence tomography-based biometer (Colombo IOL II, Moptim) and assess their agreement with those provided by the IOLMaster 700 (Zeiss).

Setting: I.R.C.C.S. Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.

Design: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test.

Methods: Patients underwent 3 consecutive scans with the Colombo IOL II and 1 with the IOLMaster 700. Two groups were analyzed: Group A included a series of consecutive patients undergoing phacoemulsification and Group B a series of subjects with a clear lens. Axial length (AL), keratometry, keratometric astigmatism, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), corneal diameter (CD), central corneal thickness (CCT) and retinal thickness (RT) were analyzed. The within-subject standard deviation (Sw), intrasession test variability, coefficient of variation (CoV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for repeatability analysis. 95% limits of agreement were calculated to assess agreement with the IOLMaster 700.

Results: Ninety-six unoperated eyes of 96 patients were enrolled (Group A: 45 Group B: 51). The CoV was low for most parameters, as it ranged between 0.04% (AL) to 4.47% (RT) in Group A and from 0.03% (AL) to 2.23% (LT) in Group B. Keratometric astigmatism measurements were less repeatable. Good agreement with the IOLMaster 700 was found for K, LT and AL, whereas the mean ACD was higher by 0.07±0.11 mm with the Colombo IOL II (p <0.0001).

Conclusion: Measurements by the Colombo IOL II showed high repeatability and good agreement with those provided by the IOLMaster 700.

新的光谱域光学相干生物计自动测量的可重复性,并与经过验证的生物计一致。
目的:评价新型光谱域光学相干层析生物计(Colombo IOL II, Moptim)测量结果的可重复性,并评估其与IOLMaster 700(蔡司)提供的测量结果的一致性。地点:意大利罗马I.R.C.C.S. Bietti基金会。设计:对诊断试验进行前瞻性评价。方法:患者使用Colombo IOL II连续扫描3次,IOLMaster 700连续扫描1次。对两组进行分析:A组为连续行超声乳化术的患者,B组为连续行透明晶状体的患者。分析眼轴长(AL)、角膜屈光度、角膜屈光度散光、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、角膜直径(CD)、角膜中央厚度(CCT)和视网膜厚度(RT)。计算受试者内标准差(Sw)、组内试验变异率、变异系数(CoV)和组内相关系数(ICC)进行重复性分析。计算95%的一致性界限以评估与IOLMaster 700的一致性。结果:96例患者共96只眼,A组45只,B组51只。大多数参数的CoV较低,A组的CoV在0.04% (AL)至4.47% (RT)之间,b组的CoV在0.03% (AL)至2.23% (LT)之间。K、LT和AL的测量结果与IOLMaster 700吻合良好,而平均ACD比Colombo IOL II高0.07±0.11 mm (p结论:Colombo IOL II的测量结果重复性高,与IOLMaster 700的测量结果吻合良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信