Hydrocephalus Renders Ventricular or Subarachnoid Drainage as an Efficacies Cure for Decompressive Craniectomy-Induced Subdural Effusion After Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Huaping Huang, Yang Chen, Wanglu Hu, Shidi Yang, Haijian Wu, Liansheng Gao, Wei Yan
{"title":"Hydrocephalus Renders Ventricular or Subarachnoid Drainage as an Efficacies Cure for Decompressive Craniectomy-Induced Subdural Effusion After Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Huaping Huang, Yang Chen, Wanglu Hu, Shidi Yang, Haijian Wu, Liansheng Gao, Wei Yan","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with decompressive craniectomy (DC) frequently accompany the complication of secondary subdural effusion (SDE). In cases where cranioplasty is contraindicated, there are no clear-cut guidelines on surgical approaches for managing subdural effusion resulting from DC. Therefore, the authors conducted this study to compare different surgical procedures for patients with SDE in the context of contraindications for cranioplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 59 patients with SDE following DC for TBI, who had contraindication of cranioplasty and received surgical treatment for SDE, were retrospectively selected from January 2010 to June 2023. The therapeutic efficacy of SDE was assessed based on the dynamic head CT scans performed within 1 month after surgery and the improvement of clinical symptoms. The authors compared the effects of ventricular or subarachnoid drainage (VSD, n = 33) and subdural drainage (SDD, n = 29), which, respectively, serve as CSF of control and direct diversion. Subgroup analysis also considered the presence or absence of hydrocephalus and the associated risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that VSD group exhibited superior therapeutic effects compared with SDD group. (75.8% versus 38.4%; P=0.004), with no significant difference in complication (P=0.543). Subgroup analysis indicates that patients with hydrocephalus who directly received VSD had better treatment effect than SDD (93.3% versus 11.1%, P<0.001), while for patients without hydrocephalus, there was no significant difference between the VSD group and the SDD group (61.1% versus 52.9%, P=0.442). Furthermore, in patients without hydrocephalus but at risk of hydrocephalus, the therapeutic effects of VSD were superior to those of SDD(100% versus 14%, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reveal that VSD could be considered first compare to SDD for SDE patients with contraindications to cranioplastyt, especially when patients have a hydrocephalus or risk factors for hydrocephalus.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010819","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with decompressive craniectomy (DC) frequently accompany the complication of secondary subdural effusion (SDE). In cases where cranioplasty is contraindicated, there are no clear-cut guidelines on surgical approaches for managing subdural effusion resulting from DC. Therefore, the authors conducted this study to compare different surgical procedures for patients with SDE in the context of contraindications for cranioplasty.

Methods: The clinical data of 59 patients with SDE following DC for TBI, who had contraindication of cranioplasty and received surgical treatment for SDE, were retrospectively selected from January 2010 to June 2023. The therapeutic efficacy of SDE was assessed based on the dynamic head CT scans performed within 1 month after surgery and the improvement of clinical symptoms. The authors compared the effects of ventricular or subarachnoid drainage (VSD, n = 33) and subdural drainage (SDD, n = 29), which, respectively, serve as CSF of control and direct diversion. Subgroup analysis also considered the presence or absence of hydrocephalus and the associated risk.

Results: This study found that VSD group exhibited superior therapeutic effects compared with SDD group. (75.8% versus 38.4%; P=0.004), with no significant difference in complication (P=0.543). Subgroup analysis indicates that patients with hydrocephalus who directly received VSD had better treatment effect than SDD (93.3% versus 11.1%, P<0.001), while for patients without hydrocephalus, there was no significant difference between the VSD group and the SDD group (61.1% versus 52.9%, P=0.442). Furthermore, in patients without hydrocephalus but at risk of hydrocephalus, the therapeutic effects of VSD were superior to those of SDD(100% versus 14%, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Our study reveal that VSD could be considered first compare to SDD for SDE patients with contraindications to cranioplastyt, especially when patients have a hydrocephalus or risk factors for hydrocephalus.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信