Stationary Oxygen Concentrator with Built-in Respiratory Rate Monitor: Clinical Validation of Its Efficacy in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
{"title":"Stationary Oxygen Concentrator with Built-in Respiratory Rate Monitor: Clinical Validation of Its Efficacy in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Satoshi Hamada, Tomohiro Handa, Kimihiko Murase, Naoya Tanabe, Yoshinari Nakatsuka, Kohei Ikezoe, Hironobu Sunadome, Susumu Sato, Atsuyasu Sato, Toyohiro Hirai","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.5012-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective The respiratory rate (RR) can be monitored continuously using a HiSanso<sup>®</sup>i, a stationary oxygen concentrator with a built-in respiratory sensor. To examine the efficacy of this device, we compared its performance with that of polysomnography in inpatient settings and the home sleep apnea test (HSAT) in residential settings for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods The oxygen flow rate was set at 1, 3, and 5 L/min in inpatient settings and 1-3 L/min (conditions similar to the home surroundings) in residential settings. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (2,1) were calculated to determine the agreement between the RR measured with the HiSanso<sup>®</sup>i and that measured with polysomnography or the HSAT. The minimum acceptable reliability level is 0.7. Results In total, 14 (10 with ILD and 4 with COPD) and 5 (all with ILD) patients were assessed in inpatient and residential settings, respectively. In inpatient settings, the detection rate of patients' respiration measured with the HiSanso<sup>®</sup>i was 77.0% and 73.3% in patients with ILD and COPD, respectively. At oxygen flow rates of 1, 3, and 5 L/min, the ICCs (2,1) were 0.91, 0.85, and 0.91, respectively, for patients with ILD and 0.96, 0.90, and 0.74, respectively, for patients with COPD. In residential settings, the detection rate of patients' respiration measured with the HiSanso<sup>®</sup>i was 86.6%, and the ICC (2,1) was 0.97. Conclusion The HiSanso<sup>®</sup>i accurately monitored the RR without any additional devices, independent of oxygen flow rates or disease status.</p>","PeriodicalId":13719,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2708-2715"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5012-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective The respiratory rate (RR) can be monitored continuously using a HiSanso®i, a stationary oxygen concentrator with a built-in respiratory sensor. To examine the efficacy of this device, we compared its performance with that of polysomnography in inpatient settings and the home sleep apnea test (HSAT) in residential settings for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods The oxygen flow rate was set at 1, 3, and 5 L/min in inpatient settings and 1-3 L/min (conditions similar to the home surroundings) in residential settings. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (2,1) were calculated to determine the agreement between the RR measured with the HiSanso®i and that measured with polysomnography or the HSAT. The minimum acceptable reliability level is 0.7. Results In total, 14 (10 with ILD and 4 with COPD) and 5 (all with ILD) patients were assessed in inpatient and residential settings, respectively. In inpatient settings, the detection rate of patients' respiration measured with the HiSanso®i was 77.0% and 73.3% in patients with ILD and COPD, respectively. At oxygen flow rates of 1, 3, and 5 L/min, the ICCs (2,1) were 0.91, 0.85, and 0.91, respectively, for patients with ILD and 0.96, 0.90, and 0.74, respectively, for patients with COPD. In residential settings, the detection rate of patients' respiration measured with the HiSanso®i was 86.6%, and the ICC (2,1) was 0.97. Conclusion The HiSanso®i accurately monitored the RR without any additional devices, independent of oxygen flow rates or disease status.
期刊介绍:
Internal Medicine is an open-access online only journal published monthly by the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine.
Articles must be prepared in accordance with "The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (see Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258-265, 1988), must be contributed solely to the Internal Medicine, and become the property of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Statements contained therein are the responsibility of the author(s). The Society reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Society.