Composite variable bias: causal analysis of weight outcomes.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ridda Ali, Andrew Prestwich, Jiaqi Ge, Claire Griffiths, Richard Allmendinger, Azar Shahgholian, Yu-Wang Chen, Mohammad Ali Mansournia, Mark S Gilthorpe
{"title":"Composite variable bias: causal analysis of weight outcomes.","authors":"Ridda Ali, Andrew Prestwich, Jiaqi Ge, Claire Griffiths, Richard Allmendinger, Azar Shahgholian, Yu-Wang Chen, Mohammad Ali Mansournia, Mark S Gilthorpe","doi":"10.1038/s41366-025-01732-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Researchers often use composite variables (e.g., BMI and change scores). By combining multiple variables (e.g., height and weight or follow-up weight and baseline weight) into a single variable it becomes challenging to untangle the causal roles of each component variable. Composite variable bias-an issue previously identified for exposure variables that may yield misleading causal inferences-is illustrated as a similar concern for composite outcomes. We explain how this occurs for composite weight outcomes: BMI, 'weight change', their combination 'BMI change', and variations involving relative change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS) cohort surveys (n = 9223) were analysed to estimate the causal effect of ethnicity, sex, economic status, malaise score, and baseline height/weight at age 23 on weight-related outcomes at age 33. The analyses were informed by a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to demonstrate the extent of composite variable bias for various weight outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimated causal effects differed across different weight outcomes. The analyses of follow-up BMI, 'weight change', 'BMI change', or relative change in body size yielded results that could lead to potentially different inferences for an intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to illustrate that causal estimates on composite weight outcomes vary and can lead to potentially misleading inferences. It is recommended that only follow-up weight be analysed while conditioning on baseline weight for meaningful estimates. How conditioning on baseline weight is implemented depends on whether baseline weight precedes or follows the exposure of interest. For the former, conditioning on baseline weight may be achieved by inclusion in the regression model or via a propensity score. For the latter, alternative strategies are necessary to model the joint effects of the exposure and baseline weight-the choice of strategy can be informed by a DAG.</p>","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01732-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Researchers often use composite variables (e.g., BMI and change scores). By combining multiple variables (e.g., height and weight or follow-up weight and baseline weight) into a single variable it becomes challenging to untangle the causal roles of each component variable. Composite variable bias-an issue previously identified for exposure variables that may yield misleading causal inferences-is illustrated as a similar concern for composite outcomes. We explain how this occurs for composite weight outcomes: BMI, 'weight change', their combination 'BMI change', and variations involving relative change.

Methods: Data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS) cohort surveys (n = 9223) were analysed to estimate the causal effect of ethnicity, sex, economic status, malaise score, and baseline height/weight at age 23 on weight-related outcomes at age 33. The analyses were informed by a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to demonstrate the extent of composite variable bias for various weight outcomes.

Results: Estimated causal effects differed across different weight outcomes. The analyses of follow-up BMI, 'weight change', 'BMI change', or relative change in body size yielded results that could lead to potentially different inferences for an intervention.

Conclusions: This is the first study to illustrate that causal estimates on composite weight outcomes vary and can lead to potentially misleading inferences. It is recommended that only follow-up weight be analysed while conditioning on baseline weight for meaningful estimates. How conditioning on baseline weight is implemented depends on whether baseline weight precedes or follows the exposure of interest. For the former, conditioning on baseline weight may be achieved by inclusion in the regression model or via a propensity score. For the latter, alternative strategies are necessary to model the joint effects of the exposure and baseline weight-the choice of strategy can be informed by a DAG.

复合变量偏倚:权重结果的因果分析。
研究背景:研究人员经常使用复合变量(如BMI和变化评分)。通过将多个变量(例如,身高和体重或后续体重和基线体重)组合为单个变量,将每个组成变量的因果关系解开变得具有挑战性。复合变量偏差——一个先前发现的可能产生误导性因果推论的暴露变量的问题——被说明为复合结果的类似问题。我们解释了复合体重结果是如何发生的:BMI,“体重变化”,它们的组合“BMI变化”,以及涉及相对变化的变化。方法:分析来自国家儿童发展研究(NCDS)队列调查(n = 9223)的数据,以估计种族、性别、经济状况、萎靡不振评分和23岁时基线身高/体重对33岁时体重相关结局的因果影响。分析通过有向无环图(DAG)来证明各种权重结果的复合变量偏倚程度。结果:估计的因果效应在不同体重结果之间存在差异。对随访BMI、“体重变化”、“BMI变化”或相对体型变化的分析得出的结果可能导致干预的潜在不同推论。结论:这是第一个研究表明,对复合体重结果的因果估计各不相同,并可能导致潜在的误导性推论。建议只分析随访体重,同时根据基线体重进行有意义的估计。如何对基线权重进行调节取决于基线权重是在感兴趣的暴露之前还是之后。对于前者,对基线权重的调节可以通过纳入回归模型或通过倾向得分来实现。对于后者,有必要采用备选策略来模拟暴露和基线体重的联合效应——策略的选择可以通过DAG提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Obesity
International Journal of Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders. We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信