Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors for Anemia in Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Indian Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.25259/ijn_379_23
Jyoti Tyagi, Manveen Kaur, Samiksha Ingale, Raja Ramachandran, Priti Meena, Divya Bajpai, Soumyadeep Bhaumik
{"title":"Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors for Anemia in Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Jyoti Tyagi, Manveen Kaur, Samiksha Ingale, Raja Ramachandran, Priti Meena, Divya Bajpai, Soumyadeep Bhaumik","doi":"10.25259/ijn_379_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are oral drugs for patients with renal anemia. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on HIF-PHIs for anemia in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD) patients. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases and trial registries for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting HIF-PHIs versus erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) for anemia in DD-CKD patients. Two authors independently conducted screening, data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. We used RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis using standard methods. Certainty of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). We included 20 RCTs involving 14,999 patients with anemia of kidney disease. The studies included roxadustat (n = 9), daprodustat (n = 5), vadadustat (n = 2), molidustat (n = 2), enarodustat (n = 1), and desidustat (n = 1). Overall, daprodustat as an alternative to ESAs reported a substantial net benefit while roxadustat showed more damage than benefit as compared to ESAs. While other HIF inhibitors demonstrated little to no difference or small benefit, daprodustat reduces the need for intravenous iron supplementation up to 52 weeks as compared to ESAs [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.77 (95% CI 0.53-1.13); p = 0.18; two studies; 674 participants; moderate certainty evidence]. Roxadustat increased treatment-emergent adverse events up to 6-52 weeks as compared to ESAs [OR: 1.45 (95% CI 1.08-1.96); p = 0.01; six studies; 1715 participants; moderate certainty evidence]. The study provided evidence on the use of HIF-PHIs for treating renal anemia in DD-CKD patients as an alternative to ESAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13359,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Nephrology","volume":"35 2","pages":"198-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijn_379_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are oral drugs for patients with renal anemia. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on HIF-PHIs for anemia in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD) patients. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases and trial registries for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting HIF-PHIs versus erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) for anemia in DD-CKD patients. Two authors independently conducted screening, data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. We used RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis using standard methods. Certainty of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). We included 20 RCTs involving 14,999 patients with anemia of kidney disease. The studies included roxadustat (n = 9), daprodustat (n = 5), vadadustat (n = 2), molidustat (n = 2), enarodustat (n = 1), and desidustat (n = 1). Overall, daprodustat as an alternative to ESAs reported a substantial net benefit while roxadustat showed more damage than benefit as compared to ESAs. While other HIF inhibitors demonstrated little to no difference or small benefit, daprodustat reduces the need for intravenous iron supplementation up to 52 weeks as compared to ESAs [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.77 (95% CI 0.53-1.13); p = 0.18; two studies; 674 participants; moderate certainty evidence]. Roxadustat increased treatment-emergent adverse events up to 6-52 weeks as compared to ESAs [OR: 1.45 (95% CI 1.08-1.96); p = 0.01; six studies; 1715 participants; moderate certainty evidence]. The study provided evidence on the use of HIF-PHIs for treating renal anemia in DD-CKD patients as an alternative to ESAs.

缺氧诱导因子脯氨酸羟化酶抑制剂治疗透析依赖性慢性肾病患者贫血:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
低氧诱导因子脯氨酸羟化酶抑制剂(HIF-PHIs)是肾性贫血患者的口服药物。本研究旨在综合HIF-PHIs在透析依赖性慢性肾脏疾病(DD-CKD)患者贫血中的证据。我们检索了PubMed、CINAHL和Cochrane中央对照试验数据库和随机对照试验(rct)注册库,以报告HIF-PHIs与促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)治疗DD-CKD患者贫血的疗效。两位作者独立进行筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。采用RevMan 5.3软件,采用标准方法进行meta分析。通过推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)来评估证据的确定性。我们纳入了20项随机对照试验,涉及14999例肾脏疾病贫血患者。研究包括roxadustat (n = 9)、daprodustat (n = 5)、vadadustat (n = 2)、molidustat (n = 2)、enarodustat (n = 1)和desidustat (n = 1)。总体而言,daprodustat作为esa的替代方案报告了实质性的净收益,而roxadustat与esa相比显示出更多的损害而不是收益。虽然其他HIF抑制剂表现出几乎没有差异或很小的益处,但与esa相比,达哌司他减少了长达52周的静脉补铁需求[优势比(or): 0.77 (95% CI 0.53-1.13);P = 0.18;两项研究;674名参与者;中等确定性证据]。与esa相比,罗沙司他增加了长达6-52周的治疗不良事件[OR: 1.45 (95% CI 1.08-1.96);P = 0.01;六项研究;1715名参与者;中等确定性证据]。该研究为使用HIF-PHIs治疗DD-CKD患者肾性贫血作为esa的替代方案提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Nephrology
Indian Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信