Enhancing Coronary Revascularization Prediction: Insights From Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) of Pericoronary Adipose Tissue and CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR).

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jie Dong, Jinxin Yu, Yang Zhao, Yang Fengfeng
{"title":"Enhancing Coronary Revascularization Prediction: Insights From Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) of Pericoronary Adipose Tissue and CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR).","authors":"Jie Dong, Jinxin Yu, Yang Zhao, Yang Fengfeng","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the fat attenuation index (FAI) of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) and fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CT-FFR) in predicting coronary revascularization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with known or suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and subsequent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were screened. FAI, lesion-specific CT-FFR, and distal-tip CT-FFR were analyzed by core laboratories blinded to patient management. Per-vessel and per-patient logistic univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to predict revascularization. Three multivariable logistic regression models were compared, with ROC curves generated for each model and AUCs compared. Incremental predictive value between models 2 and 3 was also measured using continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 94 patients who received CCTA followed by ICA were identified and analyzed; 282 vessels were included. Overall, 54 (57.4%) patients with 72 (25.5%) vessels underwent revascularization. Lesion-specific CT-FFR, FAI, and significant stenosis were significantly associated with revascularization in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Lesion-specific CT-FFR, FAI, and significant stenosis were independent predictors of coronary revascularization. In the per-vessel analysis, those with 2 or 3 risk factors had a markedly higher revascularization rate [50 of 69 (72.5%) vs. 22 of 213 (10.3%); P < 0.001]. In the per-patient analysis, those with 2 or 3 risk factors had a markedly higher revascularization rate [35 of 42 (83.3%) vs. 19 of 52 (36.5%); P < 0.001]. The continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) for the addition of FAI and CT-FFR to standard CCTA analysis (model 3 over model 2) was 0.273 (95% CI, 0.166-0.379, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the application value of CT-FFR and FAI in predicting coronary revascularization in patients with documented ACS. CT-FFR and FAI obtained from quantitative CCTA improved the prediction of future revascularization. These parameters can potentially identify patients likely to receive revascularization upon referral for cardiac catheterization. However, the clinical use of FAI may be limited by the lack of standardization in PCAT values and the absence of a clear established cutoff for clinical relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the fat attenuation index (FAI) of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) and fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CT-FFR) in predicting coronary revascularization.

Methods: Patients with known or suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and subsequent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were screened. FAI, lesion-specific CT-FFR, and distal-tip CT-FFR were analyzed by core laboratories blinded to patient management. Per-vessel and per-patient logistic univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to predict revascularization. Three multivariable logistic regression models were compared, with ROC curves generated for each model and AUCs compared. Incremental predictive value between models 2 and 3 was also measured using continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results: A total of 94 patients who received CCTA followed by ICA were identified and analyzed; 282 vessels were included. Overall, 54 (57.4%) patients with 72 (25.5%) vessels underwent revascularization. Lesion-specific CT-FFR, FAI, and significant stenosis were significantly associated with revascularization in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Lesion-specific CT-FFR, FAI, and significant stenosis were independent predictors of coronary revascularization. In the per-vessel analysis, those with 2 or 3 risk factors had a markedly higher revascularization rate [50 of 69 (72.5%) vs. 22 of 213 (10.3%); P < 0.001]. In the per-patient analysis, those with 2 or 3 risk factors had a markedly higher revascularization rate [35 of 42 (83.3%) vs. 19 of 52 (36.5%); P < 0.001]. The continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) for the addition of FAI and CT-FFR to standard CCTA analysis (model 3 over model 2) was 0.273 (95% CI, 0.166-0.379, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the application value of CT-FFR and FAI in predicting coronary revascularization in patients with documented ACS. CT-FFR and FAI obtained from quantitative CCTA improved the prediction of future revascularization. These parameters can potentially identify patients likely to receive revascularization upon referral for cardiac catheterization. However, the clinical use of FAI may be limited by the lack of standardization in PCAT values and the absence of a clear established cutoff for clinical relevance.

增强冠状动脉血运重建预测:来自冠状动脉周围脂肪组织的脂肪衰减指数(FAI)和ct衍生的分数血流储备(CT-FFR)的见解
目的:本研究旨在评价冠状动脉ct血管造影(CT-FFR)所得冠状动脉周围脂肪组织(PCAT)脂肪衰减指数(FAI)和分数血流储备在预测冠状动脉血运重建中的临床价值。方法:对已知或疑似急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的患者进行冠脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)和随后的有创冠脉血管造影(ICA)筛查。FAI、病变特异性CT-FFR和远端尖端CT-FFR由核心实验室对患者管理进行盲法分析。对每根血管和每名患者进行单变量和多变量分析以预测血运重建。比较3个多变量logistic回归模型,并对每个模型生成ROC曲线,比较auc。模型2和模型3之间的增量预测值也使用连续净重分类改进(NRI)进行测量。结果:对94例行CCTA后行ICA的患者进行了鉴定和分析;其中包括282艘船只。总的来说,54例(57.4%)患者72例(25.5%)血管重建术。在单变量和多变量分析中,病变特异性CT-FFR、FAI和明显狭窄与血运重建显著相关。病变特异性CT-FFR、FAI和明显狭窄是冠状动脉血运重建的独立预测因子。在每根血管分析中,有2或3个危险因素的患者血运重建率明显更高[69例中有50例(72.5%)vs. 213例中有22例(10.3%);P < 0.001]。在每例患者的分析中,有2或3个危险因素的患者血运重建率明显更高[42人中有35人(83.3%)对52人中有19人(36.5%);P < 0.001]。在标准CCTA分析中加入FAI和CT-FFR的持续净再分类改善(NRI)(模型3比模型2)为0.273 (95% CI, 0.166-0.379, P < 0.0001)。结论:本研究证明了CT-FFR和FAI在预测ACS患者冠脉血运重建中的应用价值。定量CCTA获得的CT-FFR和FAI提高了对未来血运重建的预测。这些参数可以潜在地识别在转诊进行心导管插入术时可能接受血运重建的患者。然而,由于PCAT值缺乏标准化和缺乏明确的临床相关性截止值,FAI的临床应用可能受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信