Estimating the effects of hypothetical ambient PM2.5 interventions on the risk of dementia using the parametric g-formula in the UK Biobank cohort.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Chengyi Lin, Riyang Liu, Caroline Sutton, Andrew Thomas DeWan, Laura Forastiere, Kai Chen
{"title":"Estimating the effects of hypothetical ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> interventions on the risk of dementia using the parametric g-formula in the UK Biobank cohort.","authors":"Chengyi Lin, Riyang Liu, Caroline Sutton, Andrew Thomas DeWan, Laura Forastiere, Kai Chen","doi":"10.1289/EHP14723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence identifies ambient particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) as a modifiable risk factor for dementia, but the potential health benefits gained by enacting regulations that reduce PM<sub>2.5</sub> remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to estimate the total effects of hypothetical ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> interventions starting in late life on the risk of dementia in a cohort using the parametric g-formula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from 291,495 participants in the UK Biobank cohort who were free of dementia and aged ≥ 55 years at baseline (2010). We estimated the total effects of hypothetical ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> interventions (achieving annual average standards of 12 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, and 9 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) from 2010 to 2019 on the risk of dementia by calculating the difference between the estimated 10-year risk of dementia under a specified hypothetical intervention and the risk under no intervention using the parametric g-formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with no intervention, the estimated 10-year risk difference of dementia was -0.54 per 1000 population (95%CI: -1.00, -0.10), -1.36 per 1000 population (95%CI: -2.44, -0.25), -1.92 per 1000 population (95%CI: -3.39, -0.33), with PM<sub>2.5</sub> interventions achieving annual average standards of 12 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, and 9 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The estimated 10-year risk of dementia decreased if the individual ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was reduced due to more stringent PM<sub>2.5</sub> standards in late life compared to the natural course without intervention on ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. Our findings, obtained using the parametric g-formula - a causal inference method that can directly evaluate the impact of hypothetical interventions - suggest that policies reducing ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution may lower the risk of dementia among UK Biobank participants who would experience more stringent ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> standards in late life. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14723.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence identifies ambient particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5μm (PM2.5) as a modifiable risk factor for dementia, but the potential health benefits gained by enacting regulations that reduce PM2.5 remain unclear.

Objectives: Our aim was to estimate the total effects of hypothetical ambient PM2.5 interventions starting in late life on the risk of dementia in a cohort using the parametric g-formula.

Methods: We used data from 291,495 participants in the UK Biobank cohort who were free of dementia and aged ≥ 55 years at baseline (2010). We estimated the total effects of hypothetical ambient PM2.5 interventions (achieving annual average standards of 12 μg/m3, 10 μg/m3, and 9 μg/m3) from 2010 to 2019 on the risk of dementia by calculating the difference between the estimated 10-year risk of dementia under a specified hypothetical intervention and the risk under no intervention using the parametric g-formula.

Results: Compared with no intervention, the estimated 10-year risk difference of dementia was -0.54 per 1000 population (95%CI: -1.00, -0.10), -1.36 per 1000 population (95%CI: -2.44, -0.25), -1.92 per 1000 population (95%CI: -3.39, -0.33), with PM2.5 interventions achieving annual average standards of 12 μg/m3, 10 μg/m3, and 9 μg/m3, respectively.

Discussion: The estimated 10-year risk of dementia decreased if the individual ambient PM2.5 exposure was reduced due to more stringent PM2.5 standards in late life compared to the natural course without intervention on ambient PM2.5 exposure. Our findings, obtained using the parametric g-formula - a causal inference method that can directly evaluate the impact of hypothetical interventions - suggest that policies reducing ambient PM2.5 pollution may lower the risk of dementia among UK Biobank participants who would experience more stringent ambient PM2.5 standards in late life. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14723.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信