Prevalence of Airflow Limitation and Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021
Hyewon Choi, Il-Youp Kwak, Chung-Ryul Oh, Jin Mo Goo, Soon Ho Yoon
{"title":"Prevalence of Airflow Limitation and Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Hyewon Choi, Il-Youp Kwak, Chung-Ryul Oh, Jin Mo Goo, Soon Ho Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are becoming important for improving the prognosis of individuals who smoke heavily. Despite the higher risk of COPD among individuals participating in lung cancer screening, many of these patients remain underdiagnosed.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>How many participants in lung cancer screening have emphysema or airflow limitation? If spirometry is incorporated into the screening, how many additional patients with airflow limitation could be newly identified?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to November 30, 2023. We included original studies reporting the prevalence of CT-confirmed emphysema and spirometry-confirmed airflow limitation. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of emphysema and airflow limitation. For studies reporting severity, we analyzed the percentage of mild versus moderate to severe cases. We also calculated the proportion of newly confirmed airflow limitation cases via spirometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 42 studies were included (emphysema, n=18; airflow limitation, n=13; both, n=11), comprising 126,842 individuals for emphysema and 72,209 for airflow limitation. The pooled prevalence of emphysema was 45.3% (95% CI), 39.3-51.2%), and that of airflow limitation was 40.1% (95% CI, 33.4-46.8%). Moderate to severe emphysema was observed in 28.8% (95% CI, 24.2-33.4%) of emphysema cases, while 54.3% (95% CI, 40.6-60.6%) had moderate to very severe airflow limitation. Furthermore, 65.2% (95% CI, 55.7-74.7%) of airflow limitation cases identified by spirometry were previously unrecognized by patients.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among screening participants, 45.3% had emphysema and 40.1% had airflow limitation, with 28.8% and 54.3% of these cases being moderate to severe, respectively. Furthermore, 65% of airflow limitation cases were previously undiagnosed. These findings suggest that incorporating spirometry into screening programs may enhance COPD detection and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are becoming important for improving the prognosis of individuals who smoke heavily. Despite the higher risk of COPD among individuals participating in lung cancer screening, many of these patients remain underdiagnosed.

Research questions: How many participants in lung cancer screening have emphysema or airflow limitation? If spirometry is incorporated into the screening, how many additional patients with airflow limitation could be newly identified?

Study design and methods: The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to November 30, 2023. We included original studies reporting the prevalence of CT-confirmed emphysema and spirometry-confirmed airflow limitation. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of emphysema and airflow limitation. For studies reporting severity, we analyzed the percentage of mild versus moderate to severe cases. We also calculated the proportion of newly confirmed airflow limitation cases via spirometry.

Results: In total, 42 studies were included (emphysema, n=18; airflow limitation, n=13; both, n=11), comprising 126,842 individuals for emphysema and 72,209 for airflow limitation. The pooled prevalence of emphysema was 45.3% (95% CI), 39.3-51.2%), and that of airflow limitation was 40.1% (95% CI, 33.4-46.8%). Moderate to severe emphysema was observed in 28.8% (95% CI, 24.2-33.4%) of emphysema cases, while 54.3% (95% CI, 40.6-60.6%) had moderate to very severe airflow limitation. Furthermore, 65.2% (95% CI, 55.7-74.7%) of airflow limitation cases identified by spirometry were previously unrecognized by patients.

Interpretation: Among screening participants, 45.3% had emphysema and 40.1% had airflow limitation, with 28.8% and 54.3% of these cases being moderate to severe, respectively. Furthermore, 65% of airflow limitation cases were previously undiagnosed. These findings suggest that incorporating spirometry into screening programs may enhance COPD detection and management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信