Prevalence of Airflow Limitation and Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021
Hyewon Choi, Il-Youp Kwak, Chung-Ryul Oh, Jin Mo Goo, Soon Ho Yoon
{"title":"Prevalence of Airflow Limitation and Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hyewon Choi, Il-Youp Kwak, Chung-Ryul Oh, Jin Mo Goo, Soon Ho Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection and treatment of COPD are becoming important for improving the prognosis of individuals who have a history of heavy smoking. Despite the higher risk of COPD among individuals participating in lung cancer screening, many of these patients continue to show rates of underdiagnosis of lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How many participants in lung cancer screening have emphysema or airflow limitation? If spirometry is incorporated into the screening, how many additional patients with airflow limitation could be identified?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception through November 30, 2023. We included original studies reporting the prevalence of CT scan-confirmed emphysema and spirometry-confirmed airflow limitation. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of emphysema and airflow limitation. For studies reporting severity, we analyzed the percentage of mild vs moderate to severe disease. We also calculated the proportion of newly confirmed cases of airflow limitation via spirometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 42 studies were included (emphysema, n = 18; airflow limitation, n = 13; both, n = 11), comprising 126,842 individuals with emphysema and 72,209 individuals with airflow limitation. The pooled prevalence of emphysema was 45.3% (95% CI, 39.3%-51.2%), and that of airflow limitation was 40.1% (95% CI, 33.4%-46.8%). Moderate to severe emphysema was observed in 28.8% of patients with emphysema (95% CI, 24.2%-33.4%), whereas 54.3% patients with emphysema (95% CI, 40.6%-60.6%) showed moderate to very severe airflow limitation. Furthermore, 65.2% of patients with airflow limitation (95% CI, 55.7%-74.7%) identified by spirometry had been unrecognized previously.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among screening participants, 45.3% demonstrated emphysema and 40.1% demonstrated airflow limitation, with 28.8% and 54.3% of these patients showing moderate to severe disease, respectively. Furthermore, 65% of patients with airflow limitation had not received a diagnosis previously. These findings suggest that incorporating spirometry into screening programs may enhance COPD detection and management.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry: </strong>International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42024513248; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection and treatment of COPD are becoming important for improving the prognosis of individuals who have a history of heavy smoking. Despite the higher risk of COPD among individuals participating in lung cancer screening, many of these patients continue to show rates of underdiagnosis of lung cancer.

Research question: How many participants in lung cancer screening have emphysema or airflow limitation? If spirometry is incorporated into the screening, how many additional patients with airflow limitation could be identified?

Study design and methods: The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception through November 30, 2023. We included original studies reporting the prevalence of CT scan-confirmed emphysema and spirometry-confirmed airflow limitation. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of emphysema and airflow limitation. For studies reporting severity, we analyzed the percentage of mild vs moderate to severe disease. We also calculated the proportion of newly confirmed cases of airflow limitation via spirometry.

Results: In total, 42 studies were included (emphysema, n = 18; airflow limitation, n = 13; both, n = 11), comprising 126,842 individuals with emphysema and 72,209 individuals with airflow limitation. The pooled prevalence of emphysema was 45.3% (95% CI, 39.3%-51.2%), and that of airflow limitation was 40.1% (95% CI, 33.4%-46.8%). Moderate to severe emphysema was observed in 28.8% of patients with emphysema (95% CI, 24.2%-33.4%), whereas 54.3% patients with emphysema (95% CI, 40.6%-60.6%) showed moderate to very severe airflow limitation. Furthermore, 65.2% of patients with airflow limitation (95% CI, 55.7%-74.7%) identified by spirometry had been unrecognized previously.

Interpretation: Among screening participants, 45.3% demonstrated emphysema and 40.1% demonstrated airflow limitation, with 28.8% and 54.3% of these patients showing moderate to severe disease, respectively. Furthermore, 65% of patients with airflow limitation had not received a diagnosis previously. These findings suggest that incorporating spirometry into screening programs may enhance COPD detection and management.

Clinical trial registry: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42024513248; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

肺癌筛查人群中气流受限和肺气肿的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的早期发现和治疗对于改善重度吸烟者的预后变得越来越重要。尽管参与肺癌筛查的个体患慢性阻塞性肺病的风险较高,但其中许多患者仍未得到充分诊断。研究问题:有多少肺癌筛查参与者有肺气肿或气流受限?如果肺活量测定纳入筛查,有多少额外的气流受限患者可以被新发现?研究设计和方法:从研究开始到2023年11月30日,检索Ovid-MEDLINE和Embase数据库。我们纳入了报告ct证实的肺气肿和肺活量测定证实的气流受限患病率的原始研究。主要结局是肺气肿的患病率和气流受限。对于报告严重程度的研究,我们分析了轻度与中度至重度病例的百分比。我们还通过肺活量测定法计算了新确诊的气流受限病例的比例。结果:共纳入42项研究(肺气肿,n=18;气流限制,n=13;两者,n=11),包括126,842例肺气肿患者和72,209例气流受限患者。肺气肿的总患病率为45.3% (95% CI), 39.3-51.2%),气流受限的总患病率为40.1% (95% CI, 33.4-46.8%)。28.8% (95% CI, 24.2-33.4%)的肺气肿患者为中度至重度肺气肿,54.3% (95% CI, 40.6-60.6%)的肺气肿患者为中度至重度气流受限。此外,65.2% (95% CI, 55.7-74.7%)的肺活量测定确定的气流受限病例以前未被患者识别。解释:在筛查参与者中,45.3%的人患有肺气肿,40.1%的人患有气流受限,其中28.8%和54.3%的病例分别为中度至重度。此外,65%的气流受限病例以前未被诊断。这些发现表明,将肺活量测定法纳入筛查方案可能会提高COPD的发现和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信