The Impact of Plan Complexity on Dose Delivery Deviations Resulting from MLC Positioning Errors in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Qinghe Peng, Peng Fan, Xunyu Wang, Fali Tao, Ruijun Niu, Li Chen
{"title":"The Impact of Plan Complexity on Dose Delivery Deviations Resulting from MLC Positioning Errors in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.","authors":"Qinghe Peng, Peng Fan, Xunyu Wang, Fali Tao, Ruijun Niu, Li Chen","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effect of plan complexity on dosimetric alterations induced by multi-leaf collimator (MLC) misplacements in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VMAT plans for 14 cervical and 10 lung cancer cases were reoptimized utilizing three distinct Aperture Shape Controller settings (none, very high, very low), resulting in three plan groups: ASC-none, ASC-vh, and ASC-vl. Four types of MLC position errors were simulated: total shifts (Type 1), open/closed (Type 2), right-side shifts (Type 3), and left-side shifts (Type 4). Plan complexity was assessed using the small aperture score (SAS). Dose deviations resulting from various MLC positioning errors and SAS values were calculated and compared among the three ASC groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The variations in planning target volume (PTV) D95% for cervical cancer were approximately 0.6%, 3.7%, 1.9%, and 1.8% per millimeter for Types 1-4 errors, respectively. In the case of lung cancer, the changes were 2.3%, 9.3%, 5.3%, and 4.6% per millimeter. The ASC-vh and ASC-vl groups exhibited significantly reduced dose changes and SAS values in response to MLC errors, as compared to the ASC-none group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Highly complex plans exhibit greater dose sensitivity to MLC positional errors. The application of ASC proves effective in reducing plan complexity and mitigating the influence of MLC errors on dose deviation.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>By elucidating the relationship between dosimetric impacts from MLC errors and plan complexity, this study offers valuable guidance for the design of radiotherapy plans, helping to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of VMAT treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of plan complexity on dosimetric alterations induced by multi-leaf collimator (MLC) misplacements in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Methods: VMAT plans for 14 cervical and 10 lung cancer cases were reoptimized utilizing three distinct Aperture Shape Controller settings (none, very high, very low), resulting in three plan groups: ASC-none, ASC-vh, and ASC-vl. Four types of MLC position errors were simulated: total shifts (Type 1), open/closed (Type 2), right-side shifts (Type 3), and left-side shifts (Type 4). Plan complexity was assessed using the small aperture score (SAS). Dose deviations resulting from various MLC positioning errors and SAS values were calculated and compared among the three ASC groups.

Results: The variations in planning target volume (PTV) D95% for cervical cancer were approximately 0.6%, 3.7%, 1.9%, and 1.8% per millimeter for Types 1-4 errors, respectively. In the case of lung cancer, the changes were 2.3%, 9.3%, 5.3%, and 4.6% per millimeter. The ASC-vh and ASC-vl groups exhibited significantly reduced dose changes and SAS values in response to MLC errors, as compared to the ASC-none group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Highly complex plans exhibit greater dose sensitivity to MLC positional errors. The application of ASC proves effective in reducing plan complexity and mitigating the influence of MLC errors on dose deviation.

Advances in knowledge: By elucidating the relationship between dosimetric impacts from MLC errors and plan complexity, this study offers valuable guidance for the design of radiotherapy plans, helping to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of VMAT treatments.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信