Clinical photon-counting CT increases CT number precision and reduces patient size dependence compared to single- and dual-energy CT.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jessica D Flores, Gavin Poludniowski, Adrian Szum, Georg Walther, Johan Lundberg, Patrik Nowik, Tobias Granberg
{"title":"Clinical photon-counting CT increases CT number precision and reduces patient size dependence compared to single- and dual-energy CT.","authors":"Jessica D Flores, Gavin Poludniowski, Adrian Szum, Georg Walther, Johan Lundberg, Patrik Nowik, Tobias Granberg","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study whether photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) can improve CT number accuracy and precision and reduce patient size dependence compared to dual-energy CT (DECT) virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) and single-energy CT (SECT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical PCCT, DECT, and SECT scanners were used to image a multi-energy quality assurance phantom and tissue-equivalent inserts with/without an outer nested annulus, representing 2 object sizes (18 and 33 cm). CT numbers were converted to linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) and regions of interest applied. Theoretical monoenergetic LAC were calculated from known elemental compositions as a ground truth. Percent differences in mean LAC between phantom sizes, between mean and theoretical LAC, and its coefficient of variation (COV) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean LAC percent differences between small and larger phantoms were highest in DECT (within -3% to 9%) and SECT (within 1%-5%), particularly at higher calcium and iodine concentrations, while being relatively constant in PCCT over material concentrations and VMI energies (within ±2%). The COV in mean LAC was consistently lower (about 2-5 times) in PCCT relative to DECT and SECT for calcium in the large phantom. With consideration of the theoretical uncertainties of 2%, both PCCT and DECT showed comparable agreement to theoretical LAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCCT VMI produces CT numbers with less dependence on patient size and increased precision in large object sizes than DECT VMI and SECT.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Clinical PCCT provides less variable CT numbers than DECT and SECT with less sensitivity to the imaged object size.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"721-733"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To study whether photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) can improve CT number accuracy and precision and reduce patient size dependence compared to dual-energy CT (DECT) virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) and single-energy CT (SECT).

Methods: Clinical PCCT, DECT, and SECT scanners were used to image a multi-energy quality assurance phantom and tissue-equivalent inserts with/without an outer nested annulus, representing 2 object sizes (18 and 33 cm). CT numbers were converted to linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) and regions of interest applied. Theoretical monoenergetic LAC were calculated from known elemental compositions as a ground truth. Percent differences in mean LAC between phantom sizes, between mean and theoretical LAC, and its coefficient of variation (COV) were calculated.

Results: Mean LAC percent differences between small and larger phantoms were highest in DECT (within -3% to 9%) and SECT (within 1%-5%), particularly at higher calcium and iodine concentrations, while being relatively constant in PCCT over material concentrations and VMI energies (within ±2%). The COV in mean LAC was consistently lower (about 2-5 times) in PCCT relative to DECT and SECT for calcium in the large phantom. With consideration of the theoretical uncertainties of 2%, both PCCT and DECT showed comparable agreement to theoretical LAC.

Conclusions: PCCT VMI produces CT numbers with less dependence on patient size and increased precision in large object sizes than DECT VMI and SECT.

Advances in knowledge: Clinical PCCT provides less variable CT numbers than DECT and SECT with less sensitivity to the imaged object size.

与单能和双能CT相比,临床光子计数CT提高了CT数的精度,减少了对患者尺寸的依赖。
目的:研究光子计数计算机断层扫描(PCCT)与双能CT (DECT)、虚拟单能成像(VMI)和单能CT (SECT)相比,是否能提高CT数的准确性、精密度和减少患者对尺寸的依赖。方法:使用临床PCCT, DECT和SECT扫描仪对具有/不具有外层嵌套环的多能质量保证假体和组织等效插入物进行成像,代表两种物体尺寸(18和33 cm)。CT值被转换成线性衰减系数(LAC),并应用感兴趣区域。理论上的单能LAC是根据已知的元素组成作为基础真理计算出来的。计算了幻影尺寸、平均LAC与理论LAC的差异百分比及其变异系数(COV)。结果:小幻影和大幻影之间LAC的平均差异在DECT(在-3%至9%之间)和SECT(在1%至5%之间)中最高,特别是在较高的钙和碘浓度下,而PCCT相对于物质浓度和VMI能量相对稳定(在±2%之间)。相对于DECT和SECT, PCCT在大幻影中钙含量的平均LAC的COV始终较低(约2至5倍)。考虑到2%的理论不确定性,PCCT和DECT都显示出与理论LAC相当的一致性。结论:与DECT VMI和SECT相比,PCCT VMI产生的CT数字对患者尺寸的依赖性较小,对大物体尺寸的精确度更高。知识进展:临床PCCT提供的可变CT数字比DECT和SECT少,对成像物体尺寸的敏感性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信