One-hoUr Troponin using a high-sensitivity Point-Of-Care assay in emergency primary care: The OUT-POC pilot study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1159/000545127
Tonje R Johannessen, Odd Martin Vallersnes, Anne Cecile K Larstorp, Sigrun Halvorsen, Dan Atar
{"title":"One-hoUr Troponin using a high-sensitivity Point-Of-Care assay in emergency primary care: The OUT-POC pilot study.","authors":"Tonje R Johannessen, Odd Martin Vallersnes, Anne Cecile K Larstorp, Sigrun Halvorsen, Dan Atar","doi":"10.1159/000545127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Novel point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) tests could enhance acute myocardial infarction (MI) assessment outside hospital. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy, feasibility, and precision of the QuidelOrtho TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay when used by non-laboratory personnel in emergency primary care. Methods A prospective pilot study was conducted from April to June 2024 at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. Patients ≥18 years with acute non-traumatic chest pain were eligible. The 0/1-hour diagnostic algorithms for the POC TriageTrue hs-cTnI and the Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT central laboratory assay (routine protocol) were compared to assess the efficacy and potential safety issues for patients triaged to MI rule-out. Results Over two months, 199 patients (median age 54 years (IQR 45-70); 52.8% female) were included. Five patients (2.5%) were hospitalised with acute MI. After a single hs-cTnI measurement, the POC algorithm categorised more patients to direct rule-out than the hs-cTnT assay (65% vs 32%). The rule-out efficacy was similar for both assays after adding the one-hour measurement (hs-cTnT 74%; POC hs-cTnI 73%). Device-related error rates were low (0.5%), with high reproducibility and repeatability (coefficients of variation <10%) when performed by non-laboratory personnel. Conclusion The 0/1-hour algorithm for the TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay appears efficient, feasible, and robust when applied by personnel without laboratory expertise in an emergency primary care setting. Further research is warranted, but given the high proportion of single sample rule-outs, 1-hour measurements could likely be avoided, improving patient management. Trial registration: not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Novel point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) tests could enhance acute myocardial infarction (MI) assessment outside hospital. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy, feasibility, and precision of the QuidelOrtho TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay when used by non-laboratory personnel in emergency primary care. Methods A prospective pilot study was conducted from April to June 2024 at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. Patients ≥18 years with acute non-traumatic chest pain were eligible. The 0/1-hour diagnostic algorithms for the POC TriageTrue hs-cTnI and the Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT central laboratory assay (routine protocol) were compared to assess the efficacy and potential safety issues for patients triaged to MI rule-out. Results Over two months, 199 patients (median age 54 years (IQR 45-70); 52.8% female) were included. Five patients (2.5%) were hospitalised with acute MI. After a single hs-cTnI measurement, the POC algorithm categorised more patients to direct rule-out than the hs-cTnT assay (65% vs 32%). The rule-out efficacy was similar for both assays after adding the one-hour measurement (hs-cTnT 74%; POC hs-cTnI 73%). Device-related error rates were low (0.5%), with high reproducibility and repeatability (coefficients of variation <10%) when performed by non-laboratory personnel. Conclusion The 0/1-hour algorithm for the TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay appears efficient, feasible, and robust when applied by personnel without laboratory expertise in an emergency primary care setting. Further research is warranted, but given the high proportion of single sample rule-outs, 1-hour measurements could likely be avoided, improving patient management. Trial registration: not applicable.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信