Differential scanning fluorimetry followed by microscale thermophoresis and/or isothermal titration calorimetry as an efficient tool for ligand screening.

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOPHYSICS
Biophysical reviews Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s12551-025-01280-3
Maria Winiewska-Szajewska, Jarosław Poznański
{"title":"Differential scanning fluorimetry followed by microscale thermophoresis and/or isothermal titration calorimetry as an efficient tool for ligand screening.","authors":"Maria Winiewska-Szajewska, Jarosław Poznański","doi":"10.1007/s12551-025-01280-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various biophysical and biochemical techniques have been developed to measure the affinity of interacting molecules. This review analyzes the combination of three methods: differential scanning fluorimetry as the initial high-throughput screening technique and microscale thermophoresis and isothermal titration calorimetry as complementary methods to quantify binding affinity. The presented work is the first to detailed compare the strengths and flaws of these three specific methods, as well as their application possibilities and complementarity. The fundamentals of these methods will be covered, including the most often-used models for characterizing observable phenomena and an emphasis on methods for analyzing data. A comprehensive review of numerous approaches to data analysis found in the literature is additionally provided, with the benefits and drawbacks of each, as well as the pitfalls and related concerns. Finally, examples of different systems will be presented, and methods used and some discrepancies in results will be described and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9094,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical reviews","volume":"17 1","pages":"199-223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-025-01280-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various biophysical and biochemical techniques have been developed to measure the affinity of interacting molecules. This review analyzes the combination of three methods: differential scanning fluorimetry as the initial high-throughput screening technique and microscale thermophoresis and isothermal titration calorimetry as complementary methods to quantify binding affinity. The presented work is the first to detailed compare the strengths and flaws of these three specific methods, as well as their application possibilities and complementarity. The fundamentals of these methods will be covered, including the most often-used models for characterizing observable phenomena and an emphasis on methods for analyzing data. A comprehensive review of numerous approaches to data analysis found in the literature is additionally provided, with the benefits and drawbacks of each, as well as the pitfalls and related concerns. Finally, examples of different systems will be presented, and methods used and some discrepancies in results will be described and discussed.

差示扫描荧光法,然后是微尺度热泳和/或等温滴定量热法,作为配体筛选的有效工具。
各种生物物理和生化技术已经发展到测量相互作用分子的亲和力。本文分析了三种方法的结合:作为初始高通量筛选技术的差示扫描荧光法和作为补充的微尺度热泳术和等温滴定量热法。本文首次详细比较了这三种具体方法的优缺点,以及它们的应用可能性和互补性。这些方法的基本原理将被涵盖,包括最常用的模型表征可观察到的现象,并强调分析数据的方法。此外,还提供了对文献中发现的许多数据分析方法的全面审查,其中包括每种方法的优点和缺点,以及陷阱和相关问题。最后,将介绍不同系统的例子,所使用的方法和结果中的一些差异将被描述和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biophysical reviews
Biophysical reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biophysics
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Biophysical Reviews aims to publish critical and timely reviews from key figures in the field of biophysics. The bulk of the reviews that are currently published are from invited authors, but the journal is also open for non-solicited reviews. Interested authors are encouraged to discuss the possibility of contributing a review with the Editor-in-Chief prior to submission. Through publishing reviews on biophysics, the editors of the journal hope to illustrate the great power and potential of physical techniques in the biological sciences, they aim to stimulate the discussion and promote further research and would like to educate and enthuse basic researcher scientists and students of biophysics. Biophysical Reviews covers the entire field of biophysics, generally defined as the science of describing and defining biological phenomenon using the concepts and the techniques of physics. This includes but is not limited by such areas as: - Bioinformatics - Biophysical methods and instrumentation - Medical biophysics - Biosystems - Cell biophysics and organization - Macromolecules: dynamics, structures and interactions - Single molecule biophysics - Membrane biophysics, channels and transportation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信