Different methods of perfusate administration do not have an effect on synovial concentrations of amikacin following intravenous regional limb perfusion.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2025-03-07 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0399
Stephanie Ortiz Gutierrez, Isabelle Kilcoyne, Laurel K Saldinger, Lucy Woodward, Jorge E Nieto
{"title":"Different methods of perfusate administration do not have an effect on synovial concentrations of amikacin following intravenous regional limb perfusion.","authors":"Stephanie Ortiz Gutierrez, Isabelle Kilcoyne, Laurel K Saldinger, Lucy Woodward, Jorge E Nieto","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if different methods of perfusate instillation influence synovial amikacin concentrations in the radiocarpal joint (RCJ) after IV regional limb perfusion (IVRLP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>6 healthy horses received an IVRLP using 2 different methods: (1) 2 g amikacin followed by 52 mL 0.9% NaCl (60 mL total; perfusate-A) and (2) 2 g amikacin diluted to 60 mL with 0.9% NaCl (perfusate-D). For both methods, the perfusion was administered over 5 minutes. Joint fluid from the RCJ was sampled at 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after instillation of the perfusate. Systemic concentrations of amikacin were measured prior to IVRLP; at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 29 minutes; and 1 minute after tourniquet removal. Amikacin concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ± SD peak synovial concentration in the RCJ was 1,447 ± 1,134 μg/mL with perfusate-D and 1,170 ± 977 μg/mL with perfusate-A. Mean ± SD time to peak concentration was 18 ± 7 minutes with perfusate-D and 20 ± 5 minutes with perfusate-A. There was no difference in peak synovial concentration (P = .684) and time to peak concentration (P = .732) between groups. There was no difference in systemic amikacin concentrations over time between groups (P = .196). All horses included reached the target synovial amikacin concentration of > 160 μg/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no difference in the systemic or the synovial concentrations of amikacin using different methods of perfusate administration.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Different methods of perfusate administration did not affect synovial concentrations of amikacin achieved when performing IVRLP. There is no advantage to administering amikacin first.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if different methods of perfusate instillation influence synovial amikacin concentrations in the radiocarpal joint (RCJ) after IV regional limb perfusion (IVRLP).

Methods: 6 healthy horses received an IVRLP using 2 different methods: (1) 2 g amikacin followed by 52 mL 0.9% NaCl (60 mL total; perfusate-A) and (2) 2 g amikacin diluted to 60 mL with 0.9% NaCl (perfusate-D). For both methods, the perfusion was administered over 5 minutes. Joint fluid from the RCJ was sampled at 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after instillation of the perfusate. Systemic concentrations of amikacin were measured prior to IVRLP; at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 29 minutes; and 1 minute after tourniquet removal. Amikacin concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

Results: Mean ± SD peak synovial concentration in the RCJ was 1,447 ± 1,134 μg/mL with perfusate-D and 1,170 ± 977 μg/mL with perfusate-A. Mean ± SD time to peak concentration was 18 ± 7 minutes with perfusate-D and 20 ± 5 minutes with perfusate-A. There was no difference in peak synovial concentration (P = .684) and time to peak concentration (P = .732) between groups. There was no difference in systemic amikacin concentrations over time between groups (P = .196). All horses included reached the target synovial amikacin concentration of > 160 μg/mL.

Conclusions: There was no difference in the systemic or the synovial concentrations of amikacin using different methods of perfusate administration.

Clinical relevance: Different methods of perfusate administration did not affect synovial concentrations of amikacin achieved when performing IVRLP. There is no advantage to administering amikacin first.

不同的灌注给药方法对静脉局部肢体灌注后阿米卡星滑膜浓度没有影响。
目的:探讨静脉局部肢体灌注(IVRLP)后不同灌注方式对桡腕关节(RCJ)滑膜阿米卡星浓度的影响。方法:6匹健康马采用两种不同的方法进行静脉灌胃:(1)阿米卡星2 g,加0.9% NaCl 52 mL(共60 mL);(2)用0.9% NaCl (perfusate-D)将阿米卡星2 g稀释至60 mL。两种方法的灌注时间均超过5分钟。分别于灌注后10、15、20、25和30分钟采集RCJ关节液。IVRLP前测定阿米卡星的全身浓度;在5、10、15、20、25和29分钟;止血带取下后1分钟。荧光偏振免疫法测定阿米卡星浓度。结果:灌注液- d和灌注液- a滑膜平均±SD峰值浓度分别为1447±1134 μg/mL和1170±977 μg/mL。灌注液- d达到峰值浓度的平均±SD时间为18±7分钟,灌注液- a为20±5分钟。两组间滑膜峰值浓度(P = .684)和到达峰值浓度的时间(P = .732)无差异。两组间阿米卡星浓度随时间变化无差异(P = 0.196)。所有马均达到滑膜阿米卡星靶浓度bbb160 μg/mL。结论:不同灌注给药方式对阿米卡星全身及滑膜浓度无显著影响。临床相关性:不同的灌注给药方法不影响行IVRLP时获得的阿米卡星滑膜浓度。首先给药阿米卡星没有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信