Increasing Private Equity Investments in Plastic Surgery Practices in the United States: Analysis of Trends and Consolidation.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Ravi Dhawan, Kendall Brooks, Orr Shauly, Denys Shay, Anjali Om, Albert Losken, Paul A Ghareeb
{"title":"Increasing Private Equity Investments in Plastic Surgery Practices in the United States: Analysis of Trends and Consolidation.","authors":"Ravi Dhawan, Kendall Brooks, Orr Shauly, Denys Shay, Anjali Om, Albert Losken, Paul A Ghareeb","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Private equity (PE) investment in healthcare has expanded rapidly, particularly in plastic surgery, where rising demand for aesthetic procedures presents attractive financial opportunities. While PE backing may enhance operational efficiencies, concerns exist regarding its potential impact on care quality, patient outcomes, and healthcare costs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines PE acquisitions of U.S. plastic surgery practices, identifying trends in investment growth, geographic distribution, and the financial models adopted by PE-backed practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed PE acquisitions of U.S. plastic surgery practices from January 1, 2000, to July 1, 2024. Data were obtained from PitchBook, verified through practice websites and follow-up inquiries. The analysis focused on acquisition trends, insurance acceptance policies, and the geographic distribution of PE-backed practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2000 and 2023, PE-backed acquisitions in plastic surgery grew by 4300% in practice volume and 7630% in capital investment. Acquisitions were concentrated in states such as Texas, Florida, and New York. PE investment was prominent in general, facial, and oculoplastic surgery practices, with a preference for cash-only models, particularly in specialized fields. Many practices employed few plastic surgeons, relying instead on aesthetic clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PE consolidation in plastic surgery is expanding rapidly, driven by demand for elective procedures. While PE investment brings financial and operational advantages, it raises concerns about healthcare quality and equity. Further research comparing PE and non-PE-owned practices is necessary to guide policies ensuring patient care quality and access.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Private equity (PE) investment in healthcare has expanded rapidly, particularly in plastic surgery, where rising demand for aesthetic procedures presents attractive financial opportunities. While PE backing may enhance operational efficiencies, concerns exist regarding its potential impact on care quality, patient outcomes, and healthcare costs.

Objectives: This study examines PE acquisitions of U.S. plastic surgery practices, identifying trends in investment growth, geographic distribution, and the financial models adopted by PE-backed practices.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed PE acquisitions of U.S. plastic surgery practices from January 1, 2000, to July 1, 2024. Data were obtained from PitchBook, verified through practice websites and follow-up inquiries. The analysis focused on acquisition trends, insurance acceptance policies, and the geographic distribution of PE-backed practices.

Results: Between 2000 and 2023, PE-backed acquisitions in plastic surgery grew by 4300% in practice volume and 7630% in capital investment. Acquisitions were concentrated in states such as Texas, Florida, and New York. PE investment was prominent in general, facial, and oculoplastic surgery practices, with a preference for cash-only models, particularly in specialized fields. Many practices employed few plastic surgeons, relying instead on aesthetic clinicians.

Conclusions: PE consolidation in plastic surgery is expanding rapidly, driven by demand for elective procedures. While PE investment brings financial and operational advantages, it raises concerns about healthcare quality and equity. Further research comparing PE and non-PE-owned practices is necessary to guide policies ensuring patient care quality and access.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信