Parental Overvaluation of Child Weight/Shape Is Associated With Disordered Eating in Children Beyond Associations With Parental Internalized Weight Bias.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Christina M Sanzari, Janet A Lydecker
{"title":"Parental Overvaluation of Child Weight/Shape Is Associated With Disordered Eating in Children Beyond Associations With Parental Internalized Weight Bias.","authors":"Christina M Sanzari, Janet A Lydecker","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parental overvaluation (ie, parental identity based on their child's weight) and parental weight bias internalization (ie, parents' internalization of societal bias toward people living in larger bodies) are both associated with their children's disordered eating. Less is known about the extent to which these constructs overlap and how their combination may relate to pediatric disordered eating.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the relationship between parental overvaluation, parental internalized weight bias, and children's disordered eating to test whether parental overvaluation was associated with disordered eating in children beyond the effects of parental internalized weight bias.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional data were collected from parents in the United States recruited online through Mechanical Turk from March 2021 through January 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>Participants included 196 parents (mean age = 38.2 years). Participants were excluded if they were younger than 21 years, lived with their child less than one-half the time, or failed to meet attention and validity checks embedded throughout assessments.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Disordered eating in children behaviors (eg, overeating, binge eating, purging, and secretive eating) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses performed: </strong>Correlations compared parental overvaluation and internalized weight bias. Hierarchical logistical regressions tested the association of internalized weight bias with disordered eating in children behaviors and then whether parental overvaluation significantly contributed to the variance in disordered eating in children eating behaviors beyond the effect of internalized weight bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all disordered eating in children behaviors, parental internalized weight bias was significant in the first step of the logistic regression when it was the sole variable (all, P < .005). When both variables were included in models, parental overvaluation, but not weight bias, was significantly associated with all disordered eating in children behaviors (all, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The extent to which a parent evaluates their worth as a parent based on their child's weight/shape is more strongly associated with disordered eating behaviors in children than with internalized weight bias. More research is needed to determine whether parent-focused treatment for pediatric eating disorders could benefit from strategies aimed at shifting the valued aspects of parental identity away from child weight/shape.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2025.02.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parental overvaluation (ie, parental identity based on their child's weight) and parental weight bias internalization (ie, parents' internalization of societal bias toward people living in larger bodies) are both associated with their children's disordered eating. Less is known about the extent to which these constructs overlap and how their combination may relate to pediatric disordered eating.

Objective: This study examined the relationship between parental overvaluation, parental internalized weight bias, and children's disordered eating to test whether parental overvaluation was associated with disordered eating in children beyond the effects of parental internalized weight bias.

Design: Cross-sectional data were collected from parents in the United States recruited online through Mechanical Turk from March 2021 through January 2022.

Participants/setting: Participants included 196 parents (mean age = 38.2 years). Participants were excluded if they were younger than 21 years, lived with their child less than one-half the time, or failed to meet attention and validity checks embedded throughout assessments.

Main outcome measures: Disordered eating in children behaviors (eg, overeating, binge eating, purging, and secretive eating) were evaluated.

Statistical analyses performed: Correlations compared parental overvaluation and internalized weight bias. Hierarchical logistical regressions tested the association of internalized weight bias with disordered eating in children behaviors and then whether parental overvaluation significantly contributed to the variance in disordered eating in children eating behaviors beyond the effect of internalized weight bias.

Results: Across all disordered eating in children behaviors, parental internalized weight bias was significant in the first step of the logistic regression when it was the sole variable (all, P < .005). When both variables were included in models, parental overvaluation, but not weight bias, was significantly associated with all disordered eating in children behaviors (all, P < .001).

Conclusions: The extent to which a parent evaluates their worth as a parent based on their child's weight/shape is more strongly associated with disordered eating behaviors in children than with internalized weight bias. More research is needed to determine whether parent-focused treatment for pediatric eating disorders could benefit from strategies aimed at shifting the valued aspects of parental identity away from child weight/shape.

父母对儿童体重/体型的过高评价与儿童饮食失调有关,而不仅仅是父母内化的体重偏见。
背景:父母的高估(基于孩子体重的父母认同)和父母体重偏见内化(父母对体重较大的人的社会偏见内化)都与孩子的饮食失调有关。对于这些结构重叠的程度以及它们的组合如何与儿童饮食失调有关,人们知之甚少。目的:本研究考察父母高估、父母内化体重偏见和儿童饮食失调之间的关系,以检验父母高估是否与儿童饮食失调相关,而不是父母内化体重偏见的影响。设计:横断面数据收集自2021年3月至2022年1月期间通过Mechanical Turk在线招募的美国父母。参与者/环境:参与者为196名父母(年龄为38.2岁)。如果参与者年龄小于21岁,与孩子住在一起的时间少于一半,或者他们未能满足整个评估过程中的注意力和有效性检查,则他们将被排除在外。主要观察指标:评估儿童饮食失调行为(暴饮暴食、暴食、空腹进食、偷偷进食)。进行了统计分析:父母高估和内化的体重偏差之间存在相关性。层次逻辑回归测试了内化体重偏差与儿童饮食失调行为的关系,然后测试了父母的高估是否在内化体重偏差的影响之外显著地促进了儿童饮食失调行为的差异。结果:在所有儿童饮食失调行为中,当父母内化体重偏差是单一变量时,在逻辑回归的第一步中,父母内化体重偏差是显著的。结论:父母根据孩子的体重/形状评估自己作为父母的程度与儿童饮食失调行为的关系比内化体重偏差更大。需要更多的研究来确定以父母为中心的儿童饮食失调治疗是否可以从旨在将父母身份的重要方面从儿童体重/形状中转移出来的策略中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信