Extraction and Characterization of Pectins from Ripe Grape Pomace Using Both Ultrasound Assisted and Conventional Techniques

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kianoush Vakilian, Leila Nateghi, Afshin Javadi, Navideh Anarjan
{"title":"Extraction and Characterization of Pectins from Ripe Grape Pomace Using Both Ultrasound Assisted and Conventional Techniques","authors":"Kianoush Vakilian,&nbsp;Leila Nateghi,&nbsp;Afshin Javadi,&nbsp;Navideh Anarjan","doi":"10.1007/s12161-024-02710-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ripe grape pomace is a waste of grape juice processing that can be considered a valuable source for pectin extraction. The pectin was extracted via optimization using both ultrasound-assisted procedure (UAE-PRGP) and conventional extraction procedure (CE-PRGP). The pH values were 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 for both techniques, the temperatures were set at 50, 60, and 70 °C for UAE, and 60, 75, and 90 °C for CE. The process time levels of the selected techniques were also different as 10, 20, and 30 min for UAE and 60, 90, and 120 min for CE. The yield (EY) of pectin extraction, the esterification degree (DE), and galacturonic acid (GA) were determined for optimization. The optimum values of pH, temperature, and time for UAE were 2.99, 58.82 °C, and 30 min, respectively, and for CE were 2.99, 66.42 °C, and 120 min, respectively. The optimum values (w/w %) for EY, DE, and GA were 16.45%, 42.97%, and 52.05%, respectively, in CE, and 24.25%, 27.78%, 61.39%, respectively, for UAE. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed that UAE-PRGP had lower DE than CE-PRGP. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) revealed that UAE-PRGP had slightly greater thermal stability than CE-PRGP while commercial pectins (apple and citrus) had higher thermal stability than both extracted pectins. The apparent viscosity values of commercial pectins were higher than those of CE-PRGP and UAE-PRGP while all pectins indicated pseudoplastic manner. The UAE-PRGP showed higher stability and emulsifying activity than CE-PRGP, while lower than commercial pectins. UAE-PRGP with more GA and EY and less DE can be potentially used in various dairy foods.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"18 2","pages":"305 - 323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-024-02710-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ripe grape pomace is a waste of grape juice processing that can be considered a valuable source for pectin extraction. The pectin was extracted via optimization using both ultrasound-assisted procedure (UAE-PRGP) and conventional extraction procedure (CE-PRGP). The pH values were 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 for both techniques, the temperatures were set at 50, 60, and 70 °C for UAE, and 60, 75, and 90 °C for CE. The process time levels of the selected techniques were also different as 10, 20, and 30 min for UAE and 60, 90, and 120 min for CE. The yield (EY) of pectin extraction, the esterification degree (DE), and galacturonic acid (GA) were determined for optimization. The optimum values of pH, temperature, and time for UAE were 2.99, 58.82 °C, and 30 min, respectively, and for CE were 2.99, 66.42 °C, and 120 min, respectively. The optimum values (w/w %) for EY, DE, and GA were 16.45%, 42.97%, and 52.05%, respectively, in CE, and 24.25%, 27.78%, 61.39%, respectively, for UAE. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed that UAE-PRGP had lower DE than CE-PRGP. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) revealed that UAE-PRGP had slightly greater thermal stability than CE-PRGP while commercial pectins (apple and citrus) had higher thermal stability than both extracted pectins. The apparent viscosity values of commercial pectins were higher than those of CE-PRGP and UAE-PRGP while all pectins indicated pseudoplastic manner. The UAE-PRGP showed higher stability and emulsifying activity than CE-PRGP, while lower than commercial pectins. UAE-PRGP with more GA and EY and less DE can be potentially used in various dairy foods.

Graphical Abstract

超声辅助与常规技术对成熟葡萄渣中果胶的提取与表征
成熟的葡萄渣是葡萄汁加工的废物,可被认为是提取果胶的宝贵来源。采用超声辅助提取法(UAE-PRGP)和常规提取法(CE-PRGP)对果胶进行优化提取。两种技术的pH值分别为1.0、2.0和3.0,UAE的温度分别为50、60和70°C, CE的温度分别为60、75和90°C。所选技术的处理时间水平也不同,UAE的处理时间为10、20和30分钟,CE的处理时间为60、90和120分钟。以果胶提取率(EY)、酯化度(DE)、半乳糖醛酸(GA)为优化指标。UAE的最佳pH、温度和时间分别为2.99、58.82°C和30 min, CE的最佳pH、温度和时间分别为2.99、66.42°C和120 min。CE对EY、DE和GA的最佳w/w %分别为16.45%、42.97%和52.05%,UAE对EY、DE和GA的最佳w/w %分别为24.25%、27.78%和61.39%。傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)显示,UAE-PRGP的DE低于CE-PRGP。差示扫描量热法(DSC)显示,UAE-PRGP的热稳定性略高于CE-PRGP,而商业果胶(苹果和柑橘)的热稳定性高于这两种提取果胶。商用果胶的表观粘度值高于CE-PRGP和UAE-PRGP,但均表现出假塑性。UAE-PRGP的稳定性和乳化活性均高于CE-PRGP,但低于商用果胶。含有更多GA和EY和更少DE的UAE-PRGP可以潜在地用于各种乳制品。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信